Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Next Gun- Thompson M1C or Stag 15L (3L)?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by .455_Hunter, Jun 29, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. .455_Hunter

    .455_Hunter Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,139
    Location:
    Colorado Front Range
    Greetings,

    I am looking to get a new fun plinking/emergency defensive long arm. I have narrowed the choices down to either a Auto-Ordnance/Kahr M1C Thompson or a Stag Arms Stag-15L (3L). The Thompson is the aluminum framed version, so it weights 8 pounds, not 13, and has a 16" barrel. The Stag is the only left handed AR type around (I am a lefty). This version is an "M-4" type, except it has front rail instead of the fixed sight. I would have to buy a scope/dot sight, plus detachable front and rear open sights. I won't buy a version with a fixed forward sight.

    Thompson Pros- Mega cool, ammo cheap, good short range stopping power, low recoil/noise, lower $$$

    Cons- Right Hand Set-up, not long range, fairly bulky

    Stag Pros- Still kinda cool, left hand set-up, good stopping power at all normal ranges, cheap mags available everywhere, can be more compact

    Cons- Very loud/flashy, more $$$ to get full set-up

    Which one would you buy and why?

    Thanks,

    Hunter
     
  2. rangerruck

    rangerruck Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    8,374
    Location:
    Texas, baby!
    id go the stag. on eof the top 5 ar parts makers out there. also their accuracy is very good. far more versatile in bullet choice, little varmint rounds up tobig boy rounds. also after say, if you dont reload, cost for 50 m1 new mfgr rounds is 25 bucks, same 50 rounds of excellent 223 rounds from black hill, about 10 to 13 bucks. after 50 boxes, you would save 700 dollars. nuff said. plus stag has most excellent customer support/ repair dept.
     
  3. .455_Hunter

    .455_Hunter Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,139
    Location:
    Colorado Front Range
    To clarlify, I am talking about a .45 ACP Thompson M1-C, not a .30 cal M-1 Carbine.
     
  4. Wes Janson

    Wes Janson Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,962
    The .223 will give you better power at longer distances. The .45 is nice but it's just not a distance round. As for the Stag, I'd kinda looked at one myself recently. The thing is, I don't understand the real purpose of flipping the components. I've only put a few hundred rounds through various ARs and M-16s, but as a lefty I never found brass ejection to be a problem (unlike certain bullpups). I've not shot it, so maybe the Stag actually is much more southpaw-friendly than a standard AR, but I don't see how. It's pretty rare to see an upper these days without a brass deflector...so what's the point?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page