Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Next Pro Gun Battle?

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Zrex, Oct 22, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Zrex

    Zrex Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    572
    Now that the AWB has expired, do you think there will be any pro gun legislation passed in the next 2-4 years?

    Do you think we will be proactive with things like, National CCW, possibly changing the "sporting purpose" wording of the '68 GCA to something more like "lawful purpose", or maybe turning on registration of new machine guns?

    Do you think we will be in a holding pattern just trying to hang on to what we have?

    Do you think we will be on the defensive fighting off .50BMG bans and "cop killer bullet" bans and calls for AWB renewal and strengthening?

    Or, some combination of the three?



    I know what I would like to see, but I am afraid that we will be, at the very least, in a holding pattern in between volleys of anti-gun proposals. I do not believe that the congress will have the will to try to do anything overtly pro-gun.

    I also hope like heck that I'm wrong.
     
  2. fletcher

    fletcher Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,559
    Location:
    TX
    I think we'll have to keep doing that regardless of our next goal - don't think we have a choice there...


    I would love to see the import ban 'repealed', it's mostly some arbitrary "you can have something like this if it's made of US parts, if it's foreign, then it's bad!"
     
  3. Dave R

    Dave R Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,628
    Location:
    Idaho
    I know there have been some bills written on national reciprocity for CCW permit holders. In other words, if you have a CCW permit, all states have to honor it.

    I've also seen some bills to give off duty/retired LEO's the right to carry nationwide.

    I think they've all died in committe. But I'm far from an expert in this field.
     
  4. itgoesboom

    itgoesboom member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,675
    Location:
    By the River
    The liberals will next continue to try to ban ammo, or at least tax it to make shooting too expensive.

    .50bmg will also be on the chopping block.

    I.G.B.
     
  5. Bobarino

    Bobarino member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,625
    Location:
    western Washington
    i'd like to see the ban on firearms in National Parks go away. its ridiculous to disarm someone in the wilderness where four legged critters, as well as the two legged ones are a threat. its also ridiculous to have to disassemble your firearm to even pass through a park!

    the '89 import ban needs to go as well as the '86 MG ban, then national CCW that overrides states bans on CCW.

    of course in order for all this to happen, we need to have Bush elected first because at least he won't fight against us. he won't fight for us either, but Kerry is dead set on disarming the nation. if he gets elected, there will be HUGE steps backwards.

    Bobby
     
  6. buzz_knox

    buzz_knox Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,849
    If Bush is elected, we will see a victory in that the UN treaty on small arms will go nowhere, and there will be nothing gun related passed. I don't see the momentum in the movement sufficient to eliminate the '86 or '89 bans at this time. Repeal of the '68 Act is a lost cause for the foreseeable future. Under DOJ and Aschroft, ATFE will lose less of its ability to illegally pressure gun dealers and this should help halt the loss of dealers.



    We might see the firearms manufactur liability restriction act passed, as a general part of tort reform.

    All in all, the status quo will remain with Bush, which isn't that bad as it allows for us to fortify the positions we have.

    With Kerry, we will see a new and expanded AWB (they learned their lessons from last time) along the lines of California's ban within 2 years. It will probably pass the Senate and may get through the House if Kerry can exert enough political pressure, no matter the makeup of the Congress. Once that is in place, we will see increased taxes on ammunition and firearms (one of Kerry's favorite proposals), and legislation allowing regulation of firearms as consumer products.

    We will also see Kerry sign a UN treaty calling for tighter controls on the small arms trade. It won't be as sweeping as what's currently called for, but will be sufficient to establish a precedent for the later restriction of private ownership of firearms. While the treaty probably won't be ratified, it will become customary international law, and the United States will be expected to cooperate with it, if not be completely bound by it.

    On the administrative side, Kerry's choice for ATFE will reevaluate the sporting requirement to preclude large numbers of imports, particularly handguns. Dealers will return to being oppressed by ATFE inspections and threats, and will continue the trend of getting out of the business.

    Oh, and in case anyone was wondering, on January 21 or so, a letter will go out from the acting head of HUD, informing Smith and Wesson that specific performance of the contract it signed with HUD to settle the potential lawsuits will be expected forthwith.
     
  7. Jim March

    Jim March Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,732
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    Washington DC's total ban will be fought in Congress next.

    If that can be lifted and then the crime rate inevitably drops, it'll be a horrendous blow to the grabbers.
     
  8. Sleeping Dog

    Sleeping Dog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,255
    Location:
    MI
    It would be nice for ATF to drop the "Once a machine gun, Always a machine gun" ban on M14 sales. Most M14's were never machine guns, and can be tack-welded to make conversion improbable.

    I'd like to see them on sale at CMP.

    Regards.
     
  9. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    The main battle--and the major victories--are all at the state level now. The fight in Congress will remain a stalemate and both sides will be fighting defensive battles. That is, they'll either be proposing DOA legislation or quashing it.

    At the state level, we've seen massive victories in shall-issue CCW. That battle will continue, though I don't know how many states will follow Alaska's lead and go all the way. I suspect we'll see growing discontent with anti policies on the state level as more citizens are packing heat and liking it.
     
  10. psyopspec

    psyopspec Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Messages:
    4,159
    Location:
    Cape Cod
    Semper Gumbi to prevent Molon Labe. I have to say a combination of your options.
     
  11. flatrock

    flatrock Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    612
    I think we may see some relief in the area of gun laws indirectly.

    Lawsuit reform could have a significant effect on preserving our rights in general, not just where firearms are concerned.

    I think that Judges appointed by Bush are much less likely to be activists that reintrepret the constitution to match their views.

    I think that we may see a weakening of the liber grip on news outlets. If they can't continue to spout lies about guns, then it will be harder to pass gun control legislation that they claim to be "sensible".

    It's hard to really tell if the tide of gun control has turned. We were trending toward more restrictive laws, and the defeat of the AWB broke that trend. But the AWB was a small gain because it really didn't do much. It was mostly symbolic that it was passed, and it was mostly symbolic when it was defeated.

    Nationwide concealed carry would be a real gain.

    The Supreme Court recognizing an individual right to keep and bear arms would be the ideal gain. However, this would be instantly followed by efforts to restrict what types of arms are allowed by that right, so recognizing that right is only the first step.

    I think one real benefit of 4 more years of Bush might be that more and more of the liberals would get flushed out of government positions over time, and we might have to deal with less of the junk anti-gun reports comming from government agencies pushing their adgenda rather than the facts.
     
  12. jdege

    jdege Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Messages:
    275
    Location:
    Minnesota
    We don't need to change the "sporting purpose" language, all we need is add a clarification - that "sporting purpose" includes target and other competitive shooting.
     
  13. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Dream on, friend! The leftist extremists have never—ever!—been daunted by mere facts.
     
  14. Waitone

    Waitone Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    5,406
    Location:
    The Land of Broccoli and Fingernails
    I would think Michigan's concealed carry law's effect on crime in Detroit would serve as an indicator of what to expect when DC rejoins the republic.
     
  15. Zrex

    Zrex Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    572
    Jdege --

    Respectfully. Is self defense a sporting purpose? Please point to the "sporting purpose" clause in the constitution. The 2nd is not about sports and hunting. Heck, the 2nd amendment doesnt even grant us the right to do anything. It merely enumerates a right we were all born with, IMHO.
     
  16. jdege

    jdege Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Messages:
    275
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Nope.

    But a repeal of the sporting purpose language is going to bring up screams of how we're importing guns in order to shoot criminals and politicians.

    Which we are, of course ;)

    But it's not politically wise to say so.

    OTOH, is there a competition for which any firearm useful for self defense would be suitable?

    Of course there is. And if there isn't we can start one.

    Those 12ga shotguns with the rotating magazines may be worthless for duck hunting, but they'd do a bang-up job in a bowling pin shoot.

    You'd never hunt with a derringer, but they fit in right nicely in the card-table competition at a Cowboy Action Shoot.
     
  17. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    We will need to work hard to keep Congress focused on not passing any anti gun legislation during the next 4 yrs, because it will surely be signed by whoever becomes president..
     
  18. jefnvk

    jefnvk Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,938
    Location:
    The Copper Country, Michigan
    As an 18 year old, I wanna buy ammo for my handgun. And, given that background checks are here to stay, I wanna be able to buy handguns, too.

    Import ban would be next on my list, and '86 MG ban.
     
  19. Gordon Fink

    Gordon Fink Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,322
    Location:
    California
    Hell, if the Republicans stay in power long enough, maybe the Democrats will start to worry about their own right to arms and their ability to “vote from the roof tops.â€

    ~G. Fink
     
  20. RevDisk

    RevDisk Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    1,737
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I've actually had a number of Democrats ask me about purchasing firearms. Their main reasons usually included a fear of more Patriot Act ish laws, and Ashcroft's wonderful trackrecord on civil liberties. I wouldn't say any of them are planning on voting from the rooftops, but I advised an SKS or a shotgun to keep in the house.
     
  21. Barbara

    Barbara Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Messages:
    3,230
    Location:
    Michigan
    One of the biggest battles I see in the upcoming years is the battle for a place for gunnies, unless we get serious about promoting ourselves. I'm already seeing conservation clubs drifting away from guns and shooting sports and towards "greener" activities. Zoning regulations are doing away with hunting even in areas where its not necessary or practical. Guns are not openly allowed anywhere near everyday life so young people who are not exposed to guns at home never see them in a non-threatening situation.

    Depending on who gets elected, we'll have some battles, but its awfully cyclical. If Kerry wins and the gun nabbers gain some ground, gun owners will get more active and so it goes.
     
  22. c_yeager

    c_yeager Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2003
    Messages:
    5,479
    Location:
    Seattle
    While I understand what you are saying i would like to point out that the "sporting purpose" thing reffers only to imported weapons. And the constitution DOES give the federal government the authority to regulate international trade. I agree that we should get rid of the law BUT, its probably the toughest battle we have since there is actual constitutional authority for it. We would have better luck repealing the NFA.
     
  23. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    Now that is an interesting comment. It would be very ironic if over the next four years, the Bush administration continues on its path of destruction of civil liberties and increasingly intrusive government, and the Democrats emerge as the party of small government and increased freedom.
     
  24. 45Cal

    45Cal Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    92
    Location:
    Florida
    Lone_Gunman,
    Don't drink the water.

    45CAL NRA Life member.
     
  25. Zedicus

    Zedicus Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    1,976
    Location:
    Idaho
    Personally I think the Sunset of the AWB was the first step forward.

    I think we should Reinforce our current positions & move toward either taking out the NFA/GCA (Or both) & going after Nationwide CCW Reciprocity at one point or another.

    The Import Ban should probably be approached very cautiously & last if passable as it was a Executive Order & will most likely be the most slippery one.

    After all that I'd say killing the Background checks then the once convicted of a felony = no guns ever again, or get the criminal charge system completely reformed as they are making nearly everything a felony anymore....

    Personally I feel that if there "Has" to be a Restriction on former criminals, that it should only apply to murder convictions only.

    Just my $0.02:cool:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page