Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

NFA rejects my Form 4, d'oh!

Discussion in 'NFA Firearms and Accessories' started by Cesiumsponge, Jan 5, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Cesiumsponge

    Cesiumsponge Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,266
    Location:
    Washington
    I need to rant.

    I submitted my Form 4 back on June 6, 2012. I JUST now got a "final notice" from the US DOJ/NFA stating that I need to redo my forms originally sent back to the transferror on 11/15/12 because the signatures weren't in blue or black ink. The Form 4's the shop fills out have all the various blanks filled out on an online form and a completed version printed out, making use of a digital signature for the transferor. All I need to do is sign it. It's a slick setup. The 4473's are like that too. They've had this setup for about a year and no issues.

    Dangit, you mean the NFA looked at my paperwork just 5 months after receiving it? Well apparently the store didn't get any such notice from the DOJ/NFA. I just left the store, filling out another Form 4 in an identical manner, hoping that it'll be accepted with the NFA branch and I don't need to start this process all over again. Hopefully this works...

    I've done successful Form 4's through these guys before with no issues, as have many others. The transferor even used a digital signature, as they do for all other suppressor sales for other customers. Maybe my NFA processor was having a bad day or she took on a really picky assistant. :banghead:

    Now I'm left wondering if they'll take what we're sending them or if I have to start over again. Anyone else ever get shafted during the NFA process? Please share your misery so I don't feel so unfortunate.
     
  2. BemidjiDweller

    BemidjiDweller Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2012
    Messages:
    280
    Location:
    Northern Minnesota
    If I read what you said correctly, they rejected your paperwork for a specific reason, and you resubmitted another set of forms exactly the same as the first set? Boy are you going to be pissed in 5 and a half months when they reject those too.
     
  3. Cesiumsponge

    Cesiumsponge Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,266
    Location:
    Washington
    Exactly the same, except the transferor's signature is done in ink this time, which was the gripe they apparently had. They never got the originals the NFA said they sent out two months ago but the copy of the original they sent is unmarked. There are no stamps, signatures, or dates the NFA processor adds when they approve the paperwork.

    At this point, there is nothing I can really do. The last several Form 4's I completed have a digital transferor signature and they liked it fine at the time.
     
  4. Recon Ron

    Recon Ron Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2012
    Messages:
    43
    ^^^^


    Wizard... I meant post 2.
     
  5. BemidjiDweller

    BemidjiDweller Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2012
    Messages:
    280
    Location:
    Northern Minnesota
    Ah, gotcha. Well hopefully they accept it instead of making you start over.
     
  6. Cesiumsponge

    Cesiumsponge Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,266
    Location:
    Washington
    Another 6-8 months...there is nothing I could do about it anyhow if that's what the NFA wanted to do.

    I suppose it could be much worse. I have some relatives trying to get citizenship. I thought 6 months and $200 was bad...
     
  7. kell490

    kell490 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    40
    Mine had a typo on the SN when we sent it to the county DA's office when we got it back we noticed the typo we just fixed it by using white out hand writing in the digit. The ATF took it anyway we didn't want to send it back to the DA's office again that took 30 days just by it self. This was in 1994 so no computer signatures then blue ink was usually frowned upon because it could not be copied on a copier.
     
  8. Aaron Baker

    Aaron Baker Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    695
    Location:
    Lexington, KY
    Did they specifically tell you that it was going to take another 6-8 months?

    Usually if there's a problem and you get a notice of it, that means they're so close to finishing the processing that it's done within a few weeks or a month from resubmittal...

    I suppose this might be different because you're resubmitting the entire forms, but I don't see why. They didn't send your money back did they?

    Aaron
     
  9. Bubbles

    Bubbles Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Messages:
    3,152
    Location:
    Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia
    ?

    We've been asking ATF to accept digital signatures for a while, always been told no. Your FFL/SOT should have known better.
     
  10. Cesiumsponge

    Cesiumsponge Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,266
    Location:
    Washington
    My SOT has used a digital signature for the transferor for at least a year without issue. I have several approved Form 4s with such a signature. It might be our processor changed her mind. At this point, we can only submit the replacement forms to their specifications and hope its only a few weeks of delay. The SOT might have to change procedure now because of this rejection.
     
  11. Aaron Baker

    Aaron Baker Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    695
    Location:
    Lexington, KY
    Ha! I guess stupid errors can happen to anyone.

    I just got my most recent Form 1 kicked back to me because I submitted two copies of the Form 1--one with an original signature, and the other as a copy. You have to have an original signature in black or blue ink on each copy.

    Of course, it says that right on the Form 1 instructions, and I should know better. Not sure why I spaced it this time.

    But as I indicated in my response above, my experience has been that when they kick one back like this, you've got 30 days to reply to them and correct the error. If you do, it gets approved in short order. Basically, most of the 6 month wait is just your paperwork sitting on someone's desk. Once they look at it, it either gets approved or they give you a chance to fix any mistakes. If you fix the mistakes, it's not another 6 month wait because it's in their pile to process right away.

    Hope that means that both me and the OP will be getting our approved stamps soon.

    Aaron
     
  12. Cesiumsponge

    Cesiumsponge Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,266
    Location:
    Washington
    Believe it or not, my first Form 4 done years ago didn't even have a reason filled out for ownership and it was approved in about 3 months. I guess it depends on the mood of the processor. Sadly they're overworked and probably the hardest workers in the entire ATF.
     
  13. CoRoMo

    CoRoMo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2007
    Messages:
    8,947
    Location:
    Californicated Colorado
    My last F4 had so many typos and errors, and I'm still astounded every time I look at it, that I can't believe they approved it.
     
  14. Aaron Baker

    Aaron Baker Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    695
    Location:
    Lexington, KY
    I agree that they're hardworking and overworked. I actually think the recent hiring of assistants probably means more forms are going to get kicked back as they notice more errors.

    Aaron
     
  15. Charger442

    Charger442 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    South Texas
    so, let me get this straight. ATF sent a notice back to your dealer back in November, they ignored it....(which if they hadnt you could have resubmitted and been approved within two weeks) but instead, because the error notice went unanswered, they denied your application and now you have to re-submit and go to the back of the line?


    i would be pissed off at my dealer. sounds like they dropped the ball.
     
  16. jmorris

    jmorris Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    9,572
    Back when they quit accepting "multi" I had one in the system that was kicked back to add a specific caliber, two weeks later it was approved.

    FWIW I always send in my forms, that way I can see when the check clears, pending etc.
     
  17. Charger442

    Charger442 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    South Texas
    Whether you send in your paperwork with your check is irrelevant, other than knowing when its cashed. That's all it does for you. The dealers name is still who is initiating the transfer to you and therefore they are the ones notified when an error occurs. That's why the stamp is sent to the dealer and not you, on a Form 4. Form 1 is different.
     
  18. jmorris

    jmorris Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    9,572
    If the op had had the information that was on the form 4 he could have checked with the NFA branch with a simple phone call and would have known that there was a problem back in November and been proactive in solving it.
     
  19. Charger442

    Charger442 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    South Texas
    While that's true, the only information you need off a form 4 to check on status with NFA is the serial number. I always get a copy of the Form 4 for my records when its sent, thought everyone knew to do that..... atleast get the can/rifle serial number. That's all you need while your waiting.


    It still doesn't change the fact that the dealer screwed him.
     
  20. Aaron Baker

    Aaron Baker Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    695
    Location:
    Lexington, KY
    I don't think you do have this "straight," Charger442.

    Maybe Cesium can chime back in, but he never said they rejected his application. He said he received a "final notice" that they needed him to correct his paperwork. A denial would mean they refunded his $200 too.

    As someone who has received a few NFA Branch notices that my information needed to be updated/corrected, I can say that they put a scary warning on the notice that if you don't correct the info within 30 days, they'll reject your application. It sounds like that they give you a second chance with a "final notice" before they just deny you. If Cesium responds to this final notice, I predict he'll get his approved stamp within the next month.

    Personally, I'm glad to know that the ATF gives you a couple of notices before rejecting your application and making you start over. Still, it is crappy that his dealer didn't notify him of the first notice, because it means he waited extra time he didn't have to.

    But from Cesium's second post, it sounds like the dealer said he never got the first notice. So how is that the dealer's fault?

    I've never personally done a Form 4. It does seem, from the way the form is worded, that the transferror is the applicant, so I guess that's who the communications are sent to. That's weird to me, since as the transferree, I'm the one paying the tax and receiving the stamp. Seems like the ATF should be sending communications to me, not the dealer.

    Does anyone else have experiences with Form 4s? Do they always communicate with the dealer, not the buyer, when there are problems?

    Aaron
     
  21. Cesiumsponge

    Cesiumsponge Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,266
    Location:
    Washington
    My dealer either ignored it, never received it, or it got lost in the shuffle. Considering the outstanding customer service my dealer is known for nationally and the great CS I've always had, I'm willing to give them a pass. I've done successful Form 4's through them, even with the digitally-printed signature just last year, without problem. In any case, the NFA did not deny my application. They sent me a final notice, which was how I discovered the issue. Replacement Form 4's have been sent out within the 30-day ultimatum the NFA gave me. It'll take a lot more than that to piss me off, unless I discover the store was malicious and purposely negligent.

    How would I know there was a problem in November unless I'm "that guy" that calls every week? I can't solve a problem I'm not made aware of. I didn't get any notification until the first week of January. It sounds like the NFA tries to contact the transferor first, then the transferee. The SOT is the transferor. They are transferring the property from their posession to the posession of the transferee. Perhaps since the issue was with an improper ink signature from the transferor, the NFA mailed it back to the transferor?

    Unless we get a few other guys who've gotten kicked back Form 4's, I don't know what's SOP at the NFA.
     
  22. Charger442

    Charger442 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    South Texas
    it seems Cesium cleared up the fact that his form 4 was not rejected, as the thread title suggests.

    glad to hear it wont be a total re-do on the wait time. good luck on the resubmittal, it should mean you will be fixed up within a couple of weeks.
     
  23. Cesiumsponge

    Cesiumsponge Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,266
    Location:
    Washington
    Yes, my use of "rejects" was incorrect. Too late to fix it now though. I'm still curious if the NFA tends to send Form 4's back that need correction to the transferor, transferee, or it's case-dependent.
     
  24. MenaceMan47

    MenaceMan47 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2011
    Messages:
    123
    I had my form 1 kicked back to me this past year for my SBR. Turns out the chief LEO didn't check ANY of the boxes above his signature indicating I wasn't a felon, fugitive of the law, etc. So... I checked them for him and sent them back. Voila, it was back in my hands 2 weeks later, stamp and all.
     
  25. BemidjiDweller

    BemidjiDweller Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2012
    Messages:
    280
    Location:
    Northern Minnesota
    Uhhh, that doesn't sound honest/legal. He agreed to the terms he signed to, not what you added later.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page