NFA SBS hack?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sambo82

Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
136
Location
Ar
Atlantic Firearms is selling a "Sig Pistol" with what appears blatantly to be a stock, albeit a short one.

http://www.atlanticfirearms.com/com...pistol-stabilizing-brace-detail.html?Itemid=0

How is this possible? They claim that it fits all pistols with a 1" diameter buffer tube, but I wasn't even aware that Sig rifles used a buffer tube. It's a neat work around if it's legit, but it's hard for me to imagine that the ATF won't clamp down on this. Thoughts?
 
Appears to be the length of the buffer tube and adds weight for better balance. You have to have a pretty strange build to use that as a shoulder stock.

Keep in mind, according to the ATF, a shoestring can be a machine gun, but a bump fire stock isn't.
 
That "brace" is designed to strap to your forearm and aid in recoil control. So the weapon is still designed to be fired with one hand.


Ah yeah I can see that in the pics now that I know to look for it. Pretty inventive. I didn't know sigs used a buffertube system for bolt return.
 
They don't. But just like AK's, you can buy adapters so you can fit your favorite AR stocks.
 
I made something like that out of the (useless) collapsible stock that came with my MAC-11. Really helped with muzzle climb in rock-n-roll mode...
 
It was submitted to ATF for approval and passed, since it's not designed to be fired from the shoulder. The material is a semi flexible foam, similar to that used in neck braces and such.... not really firm enough to work as a stock when braced against the shoulder.

Not a product I would find useful at all, but ATF felt it passed the standards.
 
Article about the brace here.
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/06/rabbi/gear-review-sig-sb15-pistol-stabilizing-brace/

Shouldering the pistol brace would be a misuse of the brace. By that, I mean it would be used in a manner not consistent with its intended purpose. Using a device in a manner that’s different from its intended purpose does not necessarily make its use, or the device itself, illegal.

The ATF approved the use of the product as a brace for shooting a pistol one-handed. Using it differently than intended does not change the classification of the device or the firearm. Case closed.

I think it's a cute workaround inherently stupid SBR laws, much like Sig's similarly droolworthy MPX-C with integrated suppressor (- shroud) that can be converted into an integral suppressor for about $200+$200 tax stamp...
http://www.sigsauer.com/CatalogProductDetails/sig-mpx-c.aspx
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top