Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Nikon scope quality

Discussion in 'Shooting Gear and Storage' started by MLC, Jan 15, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MLC

    MLC Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    468
    Location:
    Solebury, PA
    I thought I was in the market for a "tactical" scope but realized that a standard model would do just fine. I am on a limited budget
    and am considering a Nikon, either a Buckmaster or a Monarch. What is the overall quality of these scopes compared to others in their price range? I want something in the neighborhood of a 3.5-12x. How consistent are the adjustments, how durable are they?
    I am upgrading from a Springfield fixed 6.
     
  2. Swamp Yankee

    Swamp Yankee Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    203
    Location:
    Northeast Connecticut
    Top Notch.

    Definately as good as or better than other scopes in the same price range. Optics are exceptional. I have a 4.5-14X40 Buckmaster and a couple of 6.5-20X44 Monarchs. All have served me well. I have not had any problems what so ever.
    Nikon's warranty is lifetime and transferable. Since I've never had any problems I can not comment on their customer service.
    The only issue I have, and it's not a biggy, is the reticle on the Buckmaster seems a bit on the heavy side for my taste, though it has not prevented me from shooting great groups using the Remington 700 VSS it's mounted on.
    Take Care
     
  3. 762x51

    762x51 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,008
    Location:
    Setauket, NY
    I would agree. Have used the 6.5-20x44 Monarch and it is a great scope.
     
  4. 1911

    1911 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    134
    Great scopes!!
     
  5. Bottom Gun

    Bottom Gun Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    812
    Location:
    Elgin, Arizona
    Excellent scopes. I'm not familiar with the Buckmaster series, but the Monarchs and the older Nikons are great values for the money.
     
  6. LIProgun

    LIProgun Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Messages:
    94
    Location:
    Hudson Valley, NY
    I have experience with both the fixed and variable power Buckmaster scopes, and rate them highly. They compare favorably to the comparable Burris and Leupold models.
     
  7. cratz2

    cratz2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,233
    Location:
    Central IN
    I don't have a lot of experience with Nikons. I have owned two 3-9x. The second one was an older Monarch that came with an AR-15 mount and rings. Bought the mount, rings and scope for $125 and sold the scope for $180. That resale says something. The first one was a 'pre-Monarch' that I bought used - my first good scope. I sold it to buy some gun, don't even remember which one. That older Nikon was startling by how crisp it was. I was always aware I was looking through glass but man, I really wish I hadn't sold that on.

    I've looked through a couple others, both Monarchs. They seem to be a strong solid quality product and they should always make good on any warranty issues. No reason to recommend against Nikons. In the 'lower priced, high end' optics, I'm really impressed with the Weaver Grand Slams. I have two 3-10s and they are both really bright. Not quite Swarovski-bright but bright enough to hunt by moonlight with snow on the ground. My next planned scope purchase will be a 6-20x Grand Slam for my 7mm Magnum.

    Or maybe a PU sniper scope.
     
  8. BIGR

    BIGR Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    389
    Location:
    Walnut Mountains
    I own two Nikon monarch scopes and love them. They are real clear and do real well under low light conditions.
     
  9. Bottom Gun

    Bottom Gun Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    812
    Location:
    Elgin, Arizona
    Nikon is better than Leupold

    I had a little extra time this weekend so I put one of my Nikons side by side with my Leupold Vari-X-II and compared them. Both are 3-9 x 40.
    Two friends, both long time shooters, compared the two scopes and gave their opinions as well.

    The Nikon beat the Leupold hands down. The Nikon was much brighter and the images appeared sharper though it.

    All three of us agreed the Nikon was the better scope.
    Another plus is Nikons come with lens caps, Leupolds don't.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page