Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

(NJ) Corzine loses lead in governor's race

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Desertdog, Oct 12, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Desertdog

    Desertdog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,980
    Location:
    Ridgecrest Ca
    Do we dare hope?

    Corzine loses lead in governor's race
    By Donald Lambro
    THE WASHINGTON TIMES
    October 12, 2005


    New Jersey's governor's race, once considered a Democratic lock, is now in a dead heat with four weeks to go before the Nov. 8 off-year election, a new independent poll shows.
    Republican business executive Doug Forrester has gained significant ground on Democratic Sen. Jon Corzine, whose once double-digit lead has dwindled to a 44 percent to 43 percent statistical dead heat, according to a WNBC/Marist poll of 600 registered voters.
    "What was supposed to be a coronation is actually turning into a bloody duel. Two weeks ago, I had Corzine ahead of Forrester by seven or eight points, so there isn't a doubt in my mind that this latest poll is accurate," said independent pollster John Zogby.
    In a state where nearly two-thirds of all voters are either Democrats or Democratic-leaning independents, the poll showed Mr. Forrester taking 20 percent of the Democratic vote and one-third of the independent vote.
    The Forrester campaign yesterday said the poll shows that Democratic corruption and scandal was a major factor in the race, as well as property taxes, issues that Mr. Forrester has been hitting hard in his campaign ads.
    "These polls are tracking our internal polls. It's corruption, it's property taxes, it's Jon Corzine's connection to our former disgraced Governor Jim McGreevey and former disgraced Senator Bob Torricelli," said Sherry Sylvester, the Forrester campaign's communications director.
    "Even in this bluest state, it's a perfect storm for Republicans," she said.
    Mr. McGreevey resigned the governorship last year after he admitted having a homosexual affair with a top aide. Mr. Torricelli dropped out of the 2002 Senate race fewer than five weeks before the election amid an ethics scandal. His replacement, Frank R. Lautenberg, defeated Mr. Forrester.
    The poll found that 41 percent said Mr. Forrester would do the better job "cleaning up government corruption," compared with 36 percent for Mr. Corzine.
    "This is not good news for the Democrats that voters don't trust them as much. This could be the political shocker of the year," Mr. Zogby said.
    The only other gubernatorial race is in Virginia, where Republican Jerry W. Kilgore is in a tight race with Democratic Lt. Gov. Timothy M. Kaine.
    A statement by Corzine campaign spokesman M. Allyn Brooks-LaSure yesterday dismissed the decline in the polls.
    "There's strong evidence that Jon Corzine's popularity is improving as the campaign continues."
    The campaign attacked Mr. Forrester for displaying a "negative and pessimistic attitude" about New Jersey.
    The latest evidence that the race was dead even followed a recent Quinnipiac poll showing Mr. Corzine's once seemingly insurmountable lead had evaporated, putting him just four points ahead of his Republican rival
     
  2. geekWithA.45

    geekWithA.45 Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,056
    Location:
    SouthEast PA
    Don't worry.

    If it looks like Corzine is going to lose, they'll swap in a new candidate at the last minute, just like they did with Torricelli & Lautenberg.
     
  3. Henry Bowman

    Henry Bowman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,717
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Is Corzine a libertarian-conservative or a RINO?
     
  4. Refirignis

    Refirignis Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    42
    Corzine's just an extremely corrupt ******* who wants to ban all the remaining guns in the state. That's all you need to know.
     
  5. sumpnz

    sumpnz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,276
    Location:
    Sedro-Woolley, WA
    Neither. He's a hard-core Democrat/Socialist. See the second sentance, first paragraph of the quoted article.
     
  6. BADUNAME4

    BADUNAME4 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    450
    He's a hardcore socialist pretending to be a politician. His opponent is a RINO, but a true Democrat disguised as a Republican would be a massive improvement. NJ would still suffer, but a step in the correct direction nonetheless. Corzine wins if people don't vote. Forrester might win if people get out of bed on Nov. 8th.
     
  7. WT

    WT Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    1,985
    Corzine is a billionaire socialist. Not only is he funding his own campaign, but he is funding the campaign of Virginia Lt. Gov.Timothy M. Kaine.

    Forrester is only a multi-millionaire.
     
  8. BadAsh87

    BadAsh87 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2005
    Messages:
    34
    Thank god.. maybe our terrible gun laws will finally be revoked.
     
  9. Henry Bowman

    Henry Bowman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,717
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    :banghead: Sorry. I meant Doug Forrester. How is he on guns?
     
  10. DontBurnMyFlag

    DontBurnMyFlag Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2004
    Messages:
    891
    Location:
    VA
  11. davec

    davec Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    302
    Location:
    Bayonne, NJ
    Who knows.

    http://www.dougforrester.com/html/PolicyPositions.asp


    He's pro-abortion, if that means anything to ya.

    When he ran in 2002, there was this exchange during a debate:

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/july-dec02/newjersey_10-28.html

    Oh yeah, re: NJ polling...

    Only one poll has Forrester up, and only up by one point. All the others have a 8-12 point lead for Corzine.
     
  12. BADUNAME4

    BADUNAME4 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    450
    I emailed him to inquire about his position on guns and all I got was put on his email list. He understands the issue, but like the previous Republican candidate, is afraid to discuss it. Hence, the problem with RINO's: They might be surprised to find that the masses are a lot smarter than we're given credit for. Hence, the current 30% to 40% voter turnout in NJ erections. No one represents anyone, unless you belong to a union.
     
  13. Kurush

    Kurush Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,078
    Remember, you can choose not to participate in a New Jersey election, but you can't stop your dead relatives from voting.
     
  14. LAR-15

    LAR-15 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,385
    Corzine will be replaced at the last minute by Lautenberg.

    IF YOU VALUE YOUR GUNS YOU WILL VOTE FOR DOUG FORRESTER!

    :cuss:
     
  15. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Has anyone polled the dead in New Jersey?
     
  16. Henry Bowman

    Henry Bowman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,717
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Stepping in for Preacherman...

    "The cemetery poll shows both candidates locked in a dead heat."
     
  17. RavenVT100

    RavenVT100 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,107
    Let's put it this way. Everyone knows who George Soros is, correct? Corzine being elected is about the closest thing we would have to Soros being Governor.

    And as far as Forrester's position on guns: Now is not the time. It's really not. Why? Because to be elected in New Jersey, one cannot be pro-gun. The state is well indoctrinated into anti-gun, anti-self-defense groupthink/propaganda. It elicits an unpleasant reaction for a candidate to state otherwise, so it's better the issue not come up at all.
     
  18. Crosshair

    Crosshair Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,985
    Location:
    Grand Forks, North Dakota
    Air,Land&Sea

    Hence, the current 30% to 40% voter turnout in NJ erections. :what:

    Not sure if that is a typo or not. Kinda true considering politics today. :rolleyes:
     
  19. geekWithA.45

    geekWithA.45 Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,056
    Location:
    SouthEast PA
    30-40% is high for NJ.

    The 2002 election, which presented the serfs of NJ with the opportunity to wipe the legislative slate clean and start over, had a massive voter turnout of .....25%.

    They didn't even mount a TOKEN voter revolt, and in fact, increased the Dem majority.

    It was the VERY NEXT MORNING that I confirmed and finalized my tentative decision to pack up and move.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page