Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

No ammo shortage in the Army

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Jubjub, Sep 17, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jubjub

    Jubjub Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Messages:
    787
    My niece's husband is a sergeant in a National Guard engineer company that is about to deploy to Afghanistan. He's home for a few days, after spending the last couple of months training. At dinner last night, we talked a bit about the training.

    He said that the company spent three days on the machine gun ranges, working with the M249, the M240, the M2, the Mk19, and the M24 sniper rifle. In that time, they shot up $115,000 dollars worth of ammo. I'm sure that the .50 caliber rounds and the 40mm grenades are pretty pricey even at government rates, but still that sounds like a ton of ammo to play with. And this is separate from their standard rifle practice that they've been doing all summer.

    At least they'll know how to put some fire out there when the time comes.
     
  2. doc2rn

    doc2rn Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,495
    Location:
    SW Florida
    You fall back on your training when the stuff hits the oscellating rotator, I would never begrugdge someone put in harms way at such an early age from any firearm platform of familiarization. I see it as at least a better way of spending my tax $ on our men instead of on some foreign diplomat.

    You dont have to support the war; just the men who fight it.
     
  3. Thekid90

    Thekid90 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Messages:
    38
    Location:
    Florida
    +1 if it was me going i would want as much range time as possible
     
  4. EvanWilliams

    EvanWilliams member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    223
    Location:
    Plano, Texas
    I wish I would have loved guns as much when I was 17 and in the USAR as now. I never would have left. Youth is wasted on the young.
     
  5. mustang_steve

    mustang_steve Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    1,081
    Location:
    Tampa Bay area, Florida
    doc2rn summed it up greatly....regardless of our opinions on the war, let's support what it takes to get our men home, preferably unharmed.

    If that means burning up tons of ammo, let's do it. I'm willing to deal with a mass shortage of 9mm ammo if it means a soldier can come back to his family. After all, Family is what makes life truly great.
     
  6. nathan

    nathan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,067
    Its tax dollars well spent.
     
  7. Berg

    Berg Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2005
    Messages:
    90
    Location:
    Where the 92 meets the 101
    Do they really account for the dollar value of what they shoot? How did he know the exact value of what they were shooting?
     
  8. tkopp

    tkopp Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    511
    I don't have any access to the numbers, but I'm assuming the military is like any corporation in that their most expensive asset is the soldier. Food, housing, training, down time, benefits. A few extra bucks in ammo is protecting that investment.
     
  9. Mags

    Mags Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    3,235
    Location:
    Belgium
    Don't quite understand what the point is. Is the OP stating the US Military is wasting ammo? Or is he trying to state that the US Military is not rationing ammo due to limited availability? Either way it still doesn't make sense.
     
  10. zombienerd

    zombienerd Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    672
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    I will attest that the Mk19 ammo is not cheap :)

    When I qualified on that weapon, we were only allowed 25 rounds each. The Chief Gunner's Mate said that the ship couldn't afford any more than that, and we were only able to qualify 30 out of 300 people. I was happy to be one of the 30 :)
     
  11. nathan

    nathan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,067
    SUffice to say, you can only have enough number of ammo for training . Make sure they have more than enough in inventory for real combat , or else they be useless soldiers if without ammo.
     
  12. chuckusaret

    chuckusaret member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,606
    Location:
    West Palm Beach Florida
    IMO it is a waste of money and equipment to not provide the training to maintain the highest proficiency possible in the use of the equipment at all times. To question the cost of ammo in preparation of being sent into combat? or was the training going to cause a shortage of ammo? The ammo is the least of all costs in preparing a unit for combat, and the military has a sufficient stockpile of ammo to last for many years in combat and if they don't, I would guess we civilians would suffer a shortage of ammo.

    With a rate of fire of 40 rounds per minute the cost for one minute of firing exceeds
    $1,520 which far overshadows the $14,000 cost of the weapon. But that is a very cheap price for a round that has a killing radius of 15 meters.
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2009
  13. peyton

    peyton Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2006
    Messages:
    658
    As a side note the mk19 is being limited in use within Iraq. As a point area weapon it is being controlled by "higher headquarters, just like mortars and artillery".
     
  14. HGUNHNTR

    HGUNHNTR Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,541
    Location:
    Georgia
    I respectfully disagree, "some foreign diplomat" just may be able to save a lot more lives by avoiding conflict in the first place. I'm all for supporting our troops, I just wish more were out of harms way all together.
     
  15. X-Rap

    X-Rap Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Messages:
    6,651
    My son deploys in Oct. and he says the same. They will have them but can't use without authorization.
    He says it is a very effective weapon and a shame that it has effectively been removed from the arsenal.
     
  16. Mikee Loxxer

    Mikee Loxxer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    781
    Location:
    Lincoln NE
    +1 hgunhntr!
     
  17. chuckusaret

    chuckusaret member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,606
    Location:
    West Palm Beach Florida
    The restrictions on weapons is nothing new for our combat troops when they are controlled by civilians in Washington. In Vietnam we were not allowed to engage the enemy or return fire without prior approval and in many cases the delay resulted in many of our troops being killed.
     
  18. DonP

    DonP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,294
    Location:
    Chicago area
    Very different scenario from what my son faced.

    When he was deploying before the start of OIF he went to the range at Ft. Rucker to sharpen his skills with the M9 and the A2 he was issued.

    At the range they told him that only MPs and field grade officers were allowed to qualify or practice with the M9 because of an ammunition shortage in 9mm. They told him the stockpiles had gotten very low and were still building back up.

    I'm really glad to see there is plenty for the guys that really need it. Hearing that, I don't mind waiting quite so much for my next order of .223.
     
  19. James T Thomas

    James T Thomas Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,185
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Diplomacy over a rifle barrel

    Recommendation for Hgnhnter and Loxxer:

    Your principles are well focused; avoidance is the best resort. If you can!However, please also look into the history of "Diplomacy" and then make a reassesment of just how effective it is.
    Begin with the farewell address of our nation's founding father, and go right up to "Peace in Our Time."
    Please don't skip over the efforts of two of our recent Presidents; Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.
    And take a look at the efforts of his wife. Let me correct that, the Secretary of State.

    The best role models I can think of for diplomacy would be the Generals
    George Patton and Curts LeMay.

    If I had to do all that thrilling shooting over again, I would place more emphasis on removing the soldiers who will just go through the motions of shooting during combat; that is, those who enjoyed making all the banging during training, and replace them with men who had true grit -enough to earn the Combat Infantryman's Badge. Or USMC equivalent.
    Our military should not be expending hundreds, or thousands of rounds for every dead enemy soldier.

    How about that you single shot re-enactors?
     
  20. HGUNHNTR

    HGUNHNTR Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,541
    Location:
    Georgia
    ^ Very well, however, each situation is unique. What was effective or not effective yesterday, may or may not be effective today. If the goal is some sort of resolution, or victory, smart leaders don't choose the bloodiest option first. Our servicemen and women deserve the best our diplomats can offer, it may not be as glorious as a victory won in battle, but I would be willing to bet almost all on the front lines would forego the glory.

    It seems our government has been doing an exceptional job wasting money as of late. Like my grandpa used to say, "When you find something your good at, stick with it!"
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2009
  21. Hillbillyz

    Hillbillyz Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    195
    The training is well worth it, and I have heard many stories of how the bad guys will shoot at our troops from farther and farther distances. Many terrrorists have found out that shooting at our troops is a good way of ending up dead. Our boys can and do hit what they are aiming at.
     
  22. Impureclient

    Impureclient Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    838
    Location:
    Florida
    That's the craziest thing I've ever heard. Actually that's tops most crazy things. You need an order to return fire? How's that work?
    Your buddy just gets shot next to you and you then have to ask whether you can defend yourself or give him cover fire?
     
  23. armoredman

    armoredman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    16,438
    Location:
    proud to be in AZ
    Think that's nuts? Look up "policy bombing pauses". We HAVE to have civilian control of the military, but great SCOTT I wish sometimes they'd let the professionals run the war!
     
  24. danprkr

    danprkr Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,337
    Our soldiers deserve all the training, ammo, and creature comforts they can get.
     
  25. chuckusaret

    chuckusaret member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,606
    Location:
    West Palm Beach Florida
    I would suggest you discuss this with a person that served in Vietnam as a grunt, artillery or air support type, happened everyday. Before you could engage/return fire the platoon/squad/whatever you were in, you were required to call the TOC (Tacticle Operations Center) and give your position coordinates and what type unit and then wait for approval. Some times it was instant and some times approval was not given, normally after a long wait. Then you tucked your tail in and retreated. Vietnam was not a popular war and most people cared less about what happened to the troops. I was very lucky, most of my tours were in Helicopter units assigned to the 101st Airborne an organization that had their act together but only after Gen. Zais left
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page