No indictment in Cincinnati bar shooting!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sergeant Bob

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,505
Location
The Swamps of Goldwater, MI
No indictment in bar shooting


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allen: Grand jury sending a message

By Sharon Turco and Robert Anglen
The Cincinnati Enquirer


Todman Emmons (left) and Rick Wiggins, both of Northside, sit at Junker's Tavern on Friday. Earlier they had testified before a grand jury about the shooting of a robbery suspect last week at the tavern.
(Jeff Swinger photos)
| ZOOM |
Harold McKinney didn't do anything wrong when he shot a robbery suspect in a Northside bar last week, a Hamilton County grand jury determined Friday.

The grand jury ignored charges of felonious assault and carrying a gun in a liquor establishment brought by Cincinnati police against McKinney, a member of Citizens on Patrol.

The shooting victim and his accomplice, accused of robbing Junker's Tavern at gunpoint May 8, didn't get off so easy.

The men, both 18 and from Walnut Hills, were each charged with nine counts of robbery, and one was charged with having a weapon when he was not allowed to have one.

McKinney, 54, was not on patrol at the time.

More than 500 members of the Citizens on Patrol Program walk the streets of 21 Cincinnati neighborhoods on the lookout for crime. Members are never to carry weapons or intervene in a crime in progress; however, McKinney was in the bar as a patron, not a program member.

Tony Coyne, owner of Junker's Tavern in Northside, reacts with a thumbs-up as he hears the news about Harold McKinney

Grand jury proceedings are secret, but Hamilton County Prosecutor Mike Allen surmised members might have been trying to send a message.

"People in this community are fed up," Allen said. "This is a community that has had it with violent crime, and this individual took action."

The Whole Story

Sometimes the good guys do win!
 
The Grand Jury may have sent a message or the ADA may have deliberately thrown them a high fastball that they could hit out of the park. Either way, sometimes the system works the way it`s supposed to.
 
No, the prosecutor wanted an indictment. And, really, the "firearm in a liquor establishment" charge has no defense (as long as you knew you had the gun) and was a slam-dunk. But, this jury knew how to do the right thing! Violent crime has been on the rise in the Cincinnati area.


Send lawyers, guns & money.
 
Ohio criminal rules:

Felony charge must be by GJ indictment, unless waived by defendant.

I am a lawyer, but I don't play one on the Internet.


Send Lawyers, Guns, and Money!
 
Well, if you will recall from the previous thread, I predicted that the GJ would no-bill the assault charges. I'm surprised that they no-billed the Liquor Establishment charge (but not disappointed).

FWIW, when a cop plugs a bad guy (on or off duty) it usually goes to the GJ as well. Gooses and ganders.

Mike
 
Both charges were felonies. In any event, once the prosecutor chooses indictment over information for a misdem., I believe he's stuck with the result. :neener:

El Tejon: come on down and say hello yourself!

Bring lawyers, guns & ammo . . . :D
 
That guy had real nuts to let it go to the jury! Someone is looking out for this one...


Diesle
 
Diesle-

What do you mean? This was a grand jury, not a petit jury.

Mike
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top