Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

No more polly mags for the Army

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Sky, May 26, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Sky

    Sky Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Messages:
    2,927
    Location:
    Texas
    http://thisainthell.us/blog/?p=30126

     
  2. dogmush

    dogmush Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,135
    Location:
    Tampa
    To be fair, that's not what the SOUM said. (And I got it direct from TACOM LCMC)

    What it said was a description of the new updated mags, how to tell them apart from the older, and the interim mags that we have in the system, how to tell if the older mags are bad, and a reminder that ALL mags except for the three that are approved, are unauthorized. It's not a change, PMAGS have always been unauthorized and any units that bought them with GPC cards shouldn't have.

    I know a bunch of folks have and use them, along with a ton of other accessories, but that doesn't make them authorized for use.
     
  3. Sky

    Sky Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Messages:
    2,927
    Location:
    Texas
    Glad to see somethings have not changed; we carried whatever worked for us and could get our hands on.
     
  4. SilentStalker

    SilentStalker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,281
    Location:
    Somewhere in the U.S., London, or Australia
    No more PMAGS for the military? Does that mean no more for us to?

    Apparently, the gov has said that our troops are not to carry PMAGS anymore because they are not authorized for use despite their extreme proven reliability! What? That is so much BS! So, I wonder what the future of PMAGS will be for us!? Don't believe me, read below.

    http://m.military.com/daily-news/20...-high-performance-rifle-mags.html?ESRC=dod.nl
     
  5. SilentStalker

    SilentStalker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,281
    Location:
    Somewhere in the U.S., London, or Australia
    Yep, I would use whatever works and what I could find despite being approved or not. I just wonder how this is going to fare for civilian sales?
     
  6. shuvelrider

    shuvelrider Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    442
    Location:
    Western shoreline Michigan
    There is a whole pile of them for sale here at the Bagram PX, I believe around $12 each.
     
  7. Ric

    Ric Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2004
    Messages:
    759
    Location:
    Northern Indiana
    The God of Standardization
     
  8. shuvelrider

    shuvelrider Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    442
    Location:
    Western shoreline Michigan
    I see a lot of add-on gadgets on the M4's over here, not to mention aftermarket slings and holsters for the M9. A unit can do a bulk purchase of after market add-on's, so much more is available now. The army does allow units to buy outside of the normal supply channels, using the unit budget of course.
    I scored (free) a M1907 leather sling for my rifle (A2), prefer it over the cheap strap the army issues.

    Maybe I'll go see if there is gonna be a price reduction on those mags, buy a few to send home.
     
  9. postalnut25

    postalnut25 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2010
    Messages:
    538
    Location:
    Colorful Colorado
    I think the Bagram PX had the for $13.95 each when I was there :)
     
  10. JShirley

    JShirley Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    20,865
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Please remember that any links to articles should at the least say something substantive, along with at least a brief summary.
     
  11. crossrhodes

    crossrhodes Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Messages:
    624
    Location:
    Northeast Kingdom
    Go p-mag

    If anything the msg will boost P-Mag sales. Operators lov'em, troops lov'em and all that use them lov'em.
     
  12. Slamfire

    Slamfire Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,578
    Location:
    Alabama
    http://www.military.com/daily-news/...-high-performance-rifle-mags.html?ESRC=dod.nl


    There is the issue. The Army's new and "improved magazine" is not better. So the Army is going to flush out all of those PMAG's out of service to avoid comparison.

    Rule #1 of Government is keep the fat cats happy, Rule #2 of Government is minimize scandal.

    It is scandalous that off the shelf items are working better than the “new and improved” magazines, which must have cost millions to develop and millions more to make. You have a prime contractor who has a huge financial stake in keeping their “new and improved magazine” in production and neither the Army nor the Prime want troops coming back saying there are better products.

    You have got to learn, protecting the Prime Contractor is more important than protecting the troops.
     
  13. Destructo6

    Destructo6 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    1,998
    Location:
    Tucson, AZ
    That kind of nonsense goes in cycles. The official response to a complaint of the troops using non-official gear is, "Only use official gear." It's probably for CYA as much as anything.

    The proper troop response should be, "Duly noted."
     
  14. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    47,953
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    The Army never "authorized" anything other than issue magazines.
    Restating this position do discourage purchase of polymer magazines has to do with the logistical challenges of service and support for non-issue magazines
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page