Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

NPR news article on AWB today

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by geojap, Mar 11, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. geojap

    geojap Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    787
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    This news story aired this Thursday morning on All Things Considered. It can be played with Real Audio or Windows media player. It is rare that the more liberal media outlets actually get anyone into their stories who know anything about firearms. This story still uses liberal connotations and loaded terms though so you can tell which side their bread gets buttered on.

    I noticed one blatant factual error, "Automatic weapons may be against the law in the United States...."

    Go here for the story link.
    http://www.npr.org/rundowns/rundown.php?prgId=3&prgDate=11-Mar-2004

    Email them and send your comments to NPR/Morning Edition.
    morning@npr.org


    Comments, anyone?
     
  2. mdsteele

    mdsteele Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2003
    Messages:
    251
    Location:
    Sandy Ridge, NC.
    I listened to about half of it. Typical BS, from those that know nothing.
     
  3. geojap

    geojap Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    787
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    This is what I wrote them.


    Dear Sir/Madam:

    Your article of Thursday 3/11/4 contains one factual error.
    Automatic weapons are not illegal in the United States, at least by
    any federal law. They are heavily regulated by the National Firearms
    Act of 1934. Any citizen can own and responsibly use fully automatic
    firearms if they pass a stringent background check, register the
    firearm, pay a tax, and if such weapons are not prohibited by
    municipal laws.

    I broach one point with you regarding this article. The second
    amendment does not only guarantee hunters the right to hunting arms.
    It simply states the broad right to keep and bear arms. There is no
    discernable nuance regarding certain types of firearms or limitations
    on any sub-set of law-abiding activity. Don't forget, the second
    amendment was written immediately following our overthrow of British
    rule and meant to empower United States citizens with the means to
    protect our liberty, whether the threat be foreign or domestic.
    Thomas Jefferson said, "From time to time, the tree of liberty must
    be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots," and "The price of
    freedom is eternal vigilance." Second Amendment supporters do not
    take this charge lightly.

    Cheers,
    My name
    Austin, TX
     
  4. geojap

    geojap Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    787
    Location:
    Austin, TX

    You should write them.
     
  5. another okie

    another okie Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,850
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Shhhh! I don't think it's in our best interests to tell people that the NFA regulates rather than bans full auto. Most gun banners live in states with laws against full auto, so they think it's banned everywhere. Most of them don't really understand or care about the difference between state and federal law. If they realize it's still legal in some states, that will be their next target. The best way to say it in a discussion is "Fully automatic weapons are regulated by the National Firearms Act of 1934 and the Assault Weapons Bill has nothing to do with fully automatic weapons."

    Actually some of my bliss ninny friends think the AWB has been renewed. I'm not going to argue with them.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page