NRA board elections analysis

[hso]

Interesting analysis from Stephen Gutowski at The Reload

Can the new reformers save the NRA from itself? Maybe.

Analysis: Is the NRA on Track to Reform Now? [Member Exclusive]​

• Stephen Gutowski
• May 24, 2024
• 
  The reformers are ascendant at the National Rifle Association, but have they made enough progress to fix things before the wheels fall off?
  The first substantial sign that reforms had gained real sway with the NRA membership came at the beginning of the month when a slate of them won board seats, with several landing among the most-voted-for candidates. In the five years since longtime NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre was accused of diverting millions of the charity’s dollars toward lavish personal expenses, the board election was the first direct, concrete sign members were fed up with the ordeal and wanted the significant change the reformers promised.
  Most of the rest of the board seems to have gotten the message, too. While only five of the 76 board members ran on a reform platform, they took three of the four top positions in the leadership elections. The candidates put up and endorsed by the reformers won the First and Second Vice President positions. Most importantly, they picked Doug Hamlin as the permanent replacement for Wayne LaPierre as Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President.
  The group also secured a majority on the nominating committee, which decides who gets on the board election ballots and who gets put up in future leadership positions. They also got a number of members on the executive committee, which effectively operates the NRA between full board meetings.
  That’s a remarkable turnaround from just a year ago, when nearly all of the vocal reformers had been wiped off the board, and LaPierre remained in charge.
  However, the NRA’s problems have also deepened in that time. Shortly after LaPierre resigned, a jury in the group’s corruption case found he’d taken upwards of $5.5 million from its members to spend on lavish personal jet travel while the NRA failed to safeguard its assets. Those members have continued to flee, resulting in plummeting revenue that’s left the organization on the brink. Despite being forced to cut back on most core services and programs, its legal fees have continued to flow into the coffers of controversial outside counsel Bill Brewer at a furious pace.
  Its political relevance has faded, too. It can no longer support the staff needed to lobby effectively at the state and federal level, and its Political Victory Fund has uncharacteristically fallen behind the fundraising pace of the gun-control groups. While it was still able to bring Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump to speak at its annual meeting, and it has already agreed to host another event with him over the summer, there’s little chance it will be able to spend even half of what it did to help elect him in 2016.
  There’s a ticking clock element to this turnaround attempt, too.
  The second phase of the NRA’s corruption trial is set to begin in less than two months. That gives the group very little time to change course on either its legal strategy or internal practices. And, given at most 36 of the 76 board members voted for the reform leadership candidates and a member of the old leadership team won the president’s race, they are likely to face at least some internal opposition to major changes.
  There’s also the fact that the reform candidates who won weren’t the ones who’ve spoken out publicly against LaPierre’s corruption or the dodgy path past leadership took the group down. Nor are they outsiders being brought in to clean things up. Instead, like Doug Hamlin himself, many have been with the organization throughout this ordeal. If they’ve done anything to change course up to this point, they’ve done it out of public view, which may make some reform supporters skeptical of how far they’re willing to go.
  Still, less than a week into the NRA’s new leadership regime, there are already signs of substantive changes.
  The last thing the NRA’s old leadership tried to do before losing control was move the group’s headquarters from Virginia to Texas. But when reformers pressed them at the members’ meeting last Saturday, they were unable to articulate what purpose the move would serve or how much it would cost. Hamlin announced on Thursday that the move was being put on hold and encouraged more staff to work from the group’s headquarters.
  Hamlin also split up the role of John Frazer, who was found by the jury to have knowingly signed off on materially false statements about the group in government documents, and appointed a different person as the NRA’s general counsel. He also brought back Joe Debergalis to run the NRA’s general operations. Degbergalis was removed at the end of last year to make way for former spokesperson and longtime LaPierre ally Andrew Arulanandam to take the role, which put him in line to become interim CEO after LaPierre resigned.
  Hamlin has also taken a different approach to discussing the NRA’s struggles. While previous leadership largely deflected questions about them, he has acknowledged the issues head-on in an email to the NRA staff and comments to The Reload. He has promised a “new NRA” with a greater commitment to transparency and good governance.
  “I think that we’re going to be more transparent, just like we were in this board meeting today,” he told The Reload shortly after his election on Monday. “And we’re going to be good stewards of their money. And we’re going to be responsible managers and regain their trust over time.”
  His statements indicate that he and the other reformers plan to institute other changes in an effort to regain the members they lost during the ordeal.
  “Once our members see we are making progress with the changes resulting from the efforts of our Board of Directors, they will come back in significant numbers,” Hamlin said in the email to staff that was obtained by The Reload.
  But the NRA needs to do much more, and there’s not a lot of time to do it. Actions will speak louder than words, as they always do, and we’ll be here to document them if and when they happen.
  
  

 

[Craig_AR]

Hamlin also split up the role of John Frazer, who was found by the jury to have knowingly signed off on materially false statements about the group in government documents, and appointed a different person as the NRA’s general counsel.

Presumably Hamlin could not fire Frazer as Secretary because that is an elected position, just re-elected at the recent convention.
Frazer is an interesting pawn in WLP's machinations at NRA. I started paying attention to him about a year ago when Gutowski's The Reload and the blog NRA in Danger were highlighting some details of the mess. It seems that as General Counsel (GC), Frazer was never consulted on the move to declare bankruptcy, or the plan to move the NRA (as a new legal entity) to Texas. How does a corporation not have the GC deep in the middle of such decisions?

Frazer's LinkeDin profile gives is a lot of clues of context on how WLP played him.
Frazer has been an NRA employee since 1997, but did not get his law degree until 2008. He graduated from the law school at George Mason University after a 4-year program, indicating he was in their part-time night school program while continuing to work full time at NRA HQ in Research & Information (not the legal offices) until 2013, five years after earning his J.D. There is no indication that Frazer actually practiced law until he formed his practice as a firearms arm and 2nd Amendment lawyer in 2013. Then magically, only 15 months after leaving NRA to practice law, WLP hired him back as GC. Note that means he stepped into the top lawyer job for a huge non-profit corporation without any evidence of experience in corporate law, non-profit law, New York law (remember NRA is still a NY corporation), or other legal matters normally covered in a GC office.
[Experienced attorneys here in THR might attest to the danger of sitting in a top job like GC without actual experience in the any of the many legal specialties faced daily in that office.]

Based on the above, I inferred a number of aspects about Frazer as GC.
1. He was a dedicated NRA employee and member for decades, so WLP probably considered him either a loyalist to WLP, or easily manipulable.
2. He was totally in over his head as GC, without the experience to recognize what stunts WLP was pulling off, much less assert himself to the Executive Board when, or if, he spotted improper actions by WLP and the Treasurer.
3. Findings by the jury on signing materially false statements for the corporation could make him liable for sanctions by the state bar in both Virginia and New York, whichever states he is licensed in.
4. Simply put, WLP played him.
5. Side note: I think he has not engaged himself with the legal community in Virginia, given that he posted on his LinkeDin page that he needed a lawyer referral for a landlord-tenant dispute. Were he even just a website-monitor-member of the local Northern Virginia or Virginia bar associations, he would be going there for the referral he needs.

 

[Ohen Cepel]

Seems like some good signs that they may be able to turn things around, I sure hope so!

 

[starnbar]

What is the addage? Time will tell////

 

[Craig_AR]

Very interesting interview with Hamlin on Shooting News Weekly, May 31. A lot of positive vibes coming from him, and it sounds like he may actually work to make a difference.
Picked up on the link from the NRA in Danger blog.

 

[Sav .250]

It`s a shame one person that did so much good ended up in a colossal mess of his own doing.
The NRA is being held accountable that.