armoredman
Member
I don't care what the number is, a limit of any kind is a clear violation of Heller, in my non-lawyer eyes.
Agreed. Should this bill pass, it will likely be litigated. We may just find out what SCOTUS thinks those "reasonable restrictions" actually are.I don't care what the number is, a limit of any kind is a clear violation of Heller, in my non-lawyer eyes.
Barack Obama is going to become pro-gun as soon as he receives his bonus check from the gun industry.
I sympathize with those in anti-gun states and hate the idea of throwing anyone under the bus, but maybe you all should just move. PA is a short drive from you and the rural areas are very gun friendly.
Shall issue CCW at $25 for 4 years, no magazine restrictions, no stigma for owning a semi-automatic rifle. If I could have found work in PA, I'd have stayed. But even when I did leave, I moved to an even more gun friendly state where I can hunt with any type of firearm that works and that has Constitutional carry.
erm... revolvers kinda sorta maybe don't have magazines. This is a magazine capacity ban, not a cylinder capacity ban.
erm... revolvers kinda sorta maybe don't have magazines. This is a magazine capacity ban, not a cylinder capacity ban.
Wrist Rockets are already illegal in NY.i'd say we are going to resort to slingshots, but those are illegal in n.y. ,too!
From their point of view it's a half way measure. Half way between full capacity and zero. If they can get this to stick, then they will go for zero.Why 7?
Did the vote occur? Did Cuomo issue the message of necessity?vote Monday would require Cuomo to issue a "message of necessity" to dispense with the three days of public review required under the NY state constitution
They voted for these politicians, let them suffer the consequences.Yes...who says that's not the point?
Time for backstaters to consider voting with their feet? There's still plenty of room in Texas.