Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

OAL question

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by BAE984, Mar 3, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BAE984

    BAE984 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    93
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Hey all..I'm a first time loader working up some 9mm. I've created a couple dummy rounds to test..they headspace perfectly and cycle fine. I'm using 147gr plated round nose bullets, but my manual (Lyman) lists flat nose lead, and FMJ loads. The FMJ load lists OAL at 1.115", while the flat nose lead is 1.089". I'm loading these with charges from the lead bullet column, but OAL at 1.115 because it's a round nose bullet...is this correct thinking? Want to load on the safe side.

    Thanks!
     
  2. ranger335v

    ranger335v Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    3,797
    The primary issue with OAL is feeding and chambering. If it works, it's good.
     
  3. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    46,731
    Location:
    Alabama
    Yes, it is.

    ranger335v is correct. The main issue with O.A.L. for autos is to feed well. Work up your loads at that O.A.L., whatever it may be.
     
  4. thorn-

    thorn- Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    188
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    Another thing to consider: using a lower OAL than your book data can raise pressure in bad ways. Using a higher OAL will not make it unsafe, but as mentioned above can cause feeding issues. Point being: from a danger standpoint, a higher OAL is ok. Just don't go lower without considering that you're raising internal pressures.

    thorn
     
  5. BAE984

    BAE984 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    93
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Great! Thanks
     
  6. AzBuckfever

    AzBuckfever member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    157
    If just for plinking where precision accuracy isn't a concern, would it be a bad thing to just take a factory cartridge and measure the OAL; then go off that. Not meaning to highjack the thread here but every time I've shot factory ammo, I've never had an issue with FTF, Stovepipes, etc...
     
  7. rfwobbly

    rfwobbly Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,925
    Location:
    Cornelia, GA
    BAE -
    Sorry I didn't see this sooner...

    There are particular issues with 147gr in 9x19 in that the bullet is sooooo long that there isn't much room left for the powder. Take your OAL and subtract the bullet length. That will tell you where the base of the bullet lies inside the case.

    With some simple math you can calculate the base of the bullet below the case rim, so set your caliper's depth gauge to that distance and see if the depth gauge skims the powder once you've dumped that into the case.

    I shoot A CZ which is one of the tighter chambers around. When I shoot Berry 147gr RN plated, I can load those all the way out to the SAAMI max length of 1.169". You may be able to do likewise if you are tight on powder space.

    Hope this helps!
     
  8. BAE984

    BAE984 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    93
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Thanks RF...I'll check the measure. I gotta pick up a smaller powder disk tomorrow. I'm not throwing much powder, so I bet it own't be a problem.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page