Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ohio CCW holder charged

Discussion in 'Legal' started by eagle45, Jan 4, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. eagle45

    eagle45 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2004
    Messages:
    564
    Location:
    Southwest Ohio
    This one looks good for the antis. I don't know what this guy was thinking. Another article from the Dayton Daily News:

    Handgun brandished in parking lot dispute
    By Amelia Robinson
    Dayton Daily News
    BEAVERCREEK | A 28-year-old Dayton man with a permit to carry a concealed weapon placed a 9 mm handgun up to a Xenia man's neck following a New Year's Eve traffic dispute in the Mall at Fairfield Commons parking lot, Beavercreek police Sgt. James Wuebben said Tuesday.

    Jason Todd Waple was arraigned Tuesday in Fairborn Municipal Court on single counts of felonious assault and aggravated assault.
    He was released from jail Saturday after posting bond.
    Waple, who didn't return a message seeking comment, obtained his concealed-weapon permit Nov. 17 from the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office.
    Greene County First Assistant Prosecutor Suzanne M. Schmidt said this is the county's first case of a concealed-carry permit holder charged with a violent offense related to the firearm.
    The concealed-carry law went into effect in April 2004. Schmidt said a county grand jury will review the case and Waple may face charges he violated the concealed-carry law.
    Wuebben said Waple told investigators 54-year-old Ronald Plyes did not yield to him at a mall stop sign and nearly hit his vehicle.
    Waple "followed him and thought he could take the law into his own hands," Wuebben said.
    Waple's gun had 10 rounds in the magazine, but none in the chamber, he said.

    .
     
  2. Janitor

    Janitor Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,301
    Location:
    MN
    Well of course he pulled his pistol ... the guy did NOT yield at a stop sign. Didn't you read the article?

    What a complete idiot. Pulls his gun because he's pissed off. This is so unfortunate. The fact that this is one idiot in a group of thousands will be completely lost on the antis. They will always press to say that even one jerk is enough to justify stripping all good citizens of the right to protect themselves.

    Hmmm - I wonder if Waple was a plant by the antis...

    They (the antis) really need to be working on an assult swimming pool ban instead -

    http://www.poolalarms.com/pool_drowning_statistics.htm
    -
     
  3. Trip20

    Trip20 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    505
    Location:
    WI
    'Nuff said. :cool:
     
  4. Lupinus

    Lupinus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,502
    Location:
    Upstate SC
    It doesn't say what caused him to pull the gun after following the guy. Stupid to follow a guy cause he cut you off, esspecialy if he didn't hit your car. But I would really like to know what happened after the other guy stopped.

    If he was just pissed off stupid. If the other guy came out of his car with a tire iron or something to that effect and the journalist convienantly left that out then maybe not as bad (to pull the gun, not following in the first place)
     
  5. eagle45

    eagle45 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2004
    Messages:
    564
    Location:
    Southwest Ohio
    I agree it would be nice to know the entire story, especially if some of the details were intentionally left out. However, I think Mr. Waple is pretty much out of luck on this one. He will be viewed as the aggressor for following in the first place. Everything that happened after that in terms of escalation of the conflict is a result of him following the other guy.

    I wonder if Janitor is right? Could be a plant. Stranger things have happened.
     
  6. USNCHIEF

    USNCHIEF Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    26
    Location:
    Daytona Beach, Florida
    Pretty dumb

    It seems to me that once I got my CCW I became more aware of what "not to do". Why would anyone that was armed follow ("chase") someone? That is the first question the court will ask..."why did you chase". These kind of idiots are the ones that the "Brady Bunch" just love....
     
  7. K-Romulus

    K-Romulus Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2003
    Messages:
    1,146
    Location:
    Somewhere in Monkey County, MD
  8. mmike87

    mmike87 Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    911
    Location:
    Charlottesville, VA
    One instance of anything is insignificant and doesn't prove anything. How many people experience road rage and run people down in parking lots without gun?

    But then again I am speaking to people WITH a clue. Not the antis. :banghead:
     
  9. Michael Courtney

    Michael Courtney Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    550
    Location:
    New York
    Last Summer, my wife was on the jury of a case where the selective reporting could easily make it look like the CHL-holder was in the wrong. But the jury got to hear both sides of the story and they took less than 2 hours to return an acquittal. It turned out that there was substantial evidence showing the CHL holder was justified in his use of his firearm.

    A lot of important details get left out or mistrported in news stories, and I would be slow to condemn a CHL-holders actions without all the facts.

    Michael Courtney
     
  10. Old Dog

    Old Dog Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,592
    Location:
    somewhere on Puget Sound
    We just had a CPL-holding knucklehead charged in my town charged a couple days ago ... he actually pointed his handgun at a couple teenagers after a traffic collision on a local highway (the female teenage driver, apparently intoxicated, drove a short distance away after the collision, swapped seats with her male companion, and then they returned to the scene of the collision) -- apparently deciding it was necessary to hold these young people at gunpoint pending the arrival of the highway patrol, even though they constituted no danger to the man and his family and had indicated they would await the authorities anyway ...

    Regrettably, this incident made the local papers, and it does appear was accurately reported, which means another idiot with a CPL strikes a blow against the image of gun-owners who have common-sense.
     
  11. Manedwolf

    Manedwolf member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    3,693
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    The unfortunate irony is that this is the only sort of story likely to be reported, BECAUSE the individual used their weapon in an inappropriate manner.

    The very idea of CCW is that nobody knows who is armed, and hundreds of people that one might pass everyday might be carrying concealed...but you don't know. And you won't, because they're responsible owners who wouldn't pull it out unless there was no other choice in self-defense or in stopping a violent crime.

    And what can't be seen can't be reported on. Unfortunately.
     
  12. Trip20

    Trip20 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    505
    Location:
    WI
    Yeah but that's the problem. "Another idiot" out of how many non-idiot CPL holders in WA?

    What we need to do is write our papers and have them print articles regarding normal accounts of CPL holders (or whatever your states calls it) similar to:
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2006
  13. CAS700850

    CAS700850 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,304
    Location:
    Central Ohio
    :)

    THink a story like that would print? Yeah, right after "Assault Weapon Owners Donate Money to Charity", "Child Shoots Gun at Paper Target, Congratulated by School and Govenment Officials", and "Lawyer Found to be Ethical and Honest."
     
  14. Trip20

    Trip20 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    505
    Location:
    WI
    CAS700850 - One can dream :)
     
  15. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Ladies and gentlemen, I believe we have a nominee for the Understatement of the Week Award!

    Seriously: I'm sure there was a great deal more to the story. I won't be surprised if it turns out the concealed carrier was entirely justified in his course of action—but "Man Doesn't Bite Dog" isn't headline news.
     
  16. Carl N. Brown

    Carl N. Brown Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    7,924
    Location:
    Kingsport Tennessee
    A lot of jury decisions that appear incomprehensible to news audiences
    actually make sense to the jurors who heard the legally admissable
    evidence and arguments in court and followed the judges instructions
    on the law. The news accounts report misleading evidence, frivilous
    arguments by prosecutors and attorneys before the judge with
    the jury not present, endless speculation by people with pages or
    air time to fill, et cetera. News accounts are also heavily slanted
    by editoral bias and the press (and public) appetite for man-bites-dog.

    I would not bet my life on the accuracy of a single news report.
     
  17. Helmetcase

    Helmetcase Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    706
    Just have to keep making the case that exceptions like those idiots prove the rule. Just like I don't quit driving just because some idiot drinks 12 shots of tequila and plows into his neighbor's fence, I shouldn't have to surrender my right to defend myself because someone else is stupid enough to abuse the RKBA.
     
  18. Michael Courtney

    Michael Courtney Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    550
    Location:
    New York
    I would not conclude that a news story was accurately reported unless I was able to compare the news story with all the evidence and testimony given at trial. A news story takes five minutes to read. Most jury trials take several days.

    The case for which my wife served as a juror had a CHL holder holding an "honest citizen" at gun point for police. This was a fact that neither the prosecution nor the defense disputed.

    The legal issue revolved around whether a reasonable man would have felt the need to use force in the situation, given the information he had at the time. The jury concluded that holding the man at gunpoint was a reasonable use of force and acquitted the CHL holder. The jury reasoned as follows:

    1. Holding a suspected criminal at gunpoint is not the use of deadly force, it is a threat of deadly force. The applicable laws of the state have a lower thresold for the use of non-lethal force. Consequently, threatening deadly force to prevent certain crimes is acceptable in situations where actual application of deadly force would not be allowed.

    2. The fact that the "honest citizen" who was held at gunpoint had previously pulled a knife on the defendant's son and his guests and admitted he was still in possession of the knife made the threat of force reasonable.

    3. The fact that the defendant instructed his wife to call 911 before leaving his home to confront the man threatening his son and guests made the legality of his motive clear for the jury.

    4. Expert testimony presented at trial was convinving that holding a criminal at gun point may be poor tactics, but the conventional wisdom not to draw unless shooting is legally justified is a tactical idea, not a legal requirement in the state of Ohio. The jury was unwilling to convict for tactical errors.

    Michael Courtney
     
  19. Henry Bowman

    Henry Bowman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,717
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Michael, that sounds like an extraordinarily sophisticated jury.
     
  20. Michael Courtney

    Michael Courtney Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    550
    Location:
    New York
    We live in a relatively wealthy, well-educated jurisdiction. Over half of the jury had college degrees, and there were at least three engineers. Not to mention a gunsmith and a CHL holder. The only two potential jurors who got dismissed were a hair dresser and a LEO who was familiar with the details of the case.

    I've been called for jury duty a few times, and the jury my wife was on is not atypical of the folks who show up. Of course, the lawyers can skew the balance of who makes the jury during voi dire, but in the case my wife was on, the prosecutor failed to make what seemed like some obvious challenges.

    Michael Courtney
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page