franconialocal
Member
This article has got me a little concerned. It's about a California LEO (Chief) and his thoughts/concerns about open carry. Sentence No. 3 states that open carry is the practice of carrying unloaded (ok, this may or may not be depending on the individual), but I think this Chief is a little mis-informed. Thoughts?? Maybe the thinking on this topic is just the California mindset v. NH?? LET'S KEEP THIS POST RESPECTFUL AND PROFESSIONAL IN NATURE SO IT DOESN'T GET LOCKED plz.......
http://www.apbweb.com/news/9-opinion-editorial/1609-open-carry-a-threat-to-officers.html
I am a LEO and definately in a different camp of thought from this Chief. All due respect to your position and rank sir....this is just not the case here in NH. Most of my interactions with the open carry folks in the state (including myself!!) have been respectful and cordial. Frankly, the gun I CANT see is the one I'm more concerned with. I've seen other posts about this topic as well, but I wanted to point out this specific article.
http://www.apbweb.com/news/9-opinion-editorial/1609-open-carry-a-threat-to-officers.html
I am a LEO and definately in a different camp of thought from this Chief. All due respect to your position and rank sir....this is just not the case here in NH. Most of my interactions with the open carry folks in the state (including myself!!) have been respectful and cordial. Frankly, the gun I CANT see is the one I'm more concerned with. I've seen other posts about this topic as well, but I wanted to point out this specific article.