Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Opinions on S&W 39-2?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Croyance, Oct 24, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Croyance

    Croyance Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,160
    I found a used S&W 39-2 with some finish wear for $400. Mechanically it looks okay. I don't love the length to width ratio of the grip, but it isn't terrible.

    Any experiences with this gun? I understand the 39 series is well known for eating everything. While I know each gun is individual, any warnings or caveats for the 39-2?

    Thanks.
     
  2. FPrice

    FPrice Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,380
    Location:
    People's Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    I miss my 39-2. It was a good pistol for me although it has been eclipsed by my Glocks. $400 sounds a bit high to me but everything seems to be going up. Except my retirement check. :mad:
     
  3. ShelbyV8

    ShelbyV8 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2005
    Messages:
    200
    Location:
    Killeen
    Check CDNN they had some at a resonable price.
     
  4. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    Like my friend Frosty, I miss all the S&W 39-2's I've owned over
    the years~! Especially, the NIB factory nickel model with S/N A222567.
    It was pristine, and UNFIRED~!:banghead: Oh well, I guess we live and
    learn, don't we?:eek:
     
  5. MICHAEL T

    MICHAEL T Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,011
    Location:
    outback Kentucky
    I think 400 is about 50 to high I let a 98% get away couple weeks ago at shop for 365. While I was deciding someone had decided Next time I wiil think a little faster. Best S&W auto ever made Only one of S&W autos I will even consider buying.
     
  6. Moonclip

    Moonclip Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,766
    Location:
    USA
    Too high! Guns seem ergonomic and I stupidly passed a 39 with multiple mags in blue wore condition like in 2000 for $150. I've heard of issue with non -2 versions especially accuracy but I've never owned a 39 of any sort.
     
  7. Srigs

    Srigs Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2006
    Messages:
    836
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Sweet shooting guns but 400 is 100 to high. One of the most accurate guns I have owned! :)
     
  8. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    Guess Waht Folk's-

    I have a Smith & Wesson model 39 (not a 39-2) in my hands as we speak.
    This gun was originally shipped to the Illinois State Police, and it was
    manufactuered between 1966 and 1970. In 1970, after serial 115,000
    the "A" prefix was added. This weapons serial number is 87XXX, with
    no "A" prefix. It has the Illinois State Police inventory number of 813
    stamped on the left side of the frame, and also on the magazine. The
    weapon would grade out at a N.R.A. standard of 'bout 85% at best.
    The original walnut wood grips are simply beautiful, with no marks,
    scratches, chips, etc. anywhere. Some of the bluing on the slide,
    and anodizing of the frame show bright spots; but its few and far
    between. Its just a darn shame that this weapon doesn't belong
    too me; as I'm only cleaning it for a friend. Perhaps, I will make
    him an offer on it, but I don't think its for sale~!:( :eek: :D

    PS: Sorry about the typo in the title, I guess my fingers acted
    before my brain was in gear (Laughing Loudly).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page