Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Opinions, please; Colt or Glock?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Steelharp, Jan 7, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Steelharp

    Steelharp Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    957
    Location:
    Gallatin, TN
    I have the opportunity to buy either a new Colt Commander or the new Glock 37 .45 for the same price out the door. If you had to choose just one, which would you go with?

    Let me say, I have always been partial to the 1911 platform, but I really like the Glock 17 I got used. The 17 is what's making me wonder; otherwise, it would have been the Commander without hesitation.

    Mikey D...
     
  2. VaughnT

    VaughnT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,009
    Location:
    Western SC
    Without a doubt, I'd snag the Commander right up....long before I'd get a Glock. Don't get me wrong, Glocks are quite serviceable weapons, but that's where they stop. The Colt has a long lineage that has some resale value and can be modified to fit your person/personality a lot better than the Glock can. The Colt also has true safeties that make carrying it a whole lot better on the peace of mind.

    Is this a Commander (aluminum frame) or Combat Commander (steel frame) you're looking at? Is weight a real issue? Is capacity an issue? Are you a tinkerer?

    What's this guy asking for the Commander? Is it Series 80? Does it have nice rollmarks?

    Gotta love those Colts!
     
  3. jamz

    jamz Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,771
    Location:
    I'm a maniac, maniac at your door
  4. Drjones

    Drjones member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,803
    Neither. And both.

    I'd either get a full-sized Colt or any Glock but the 37 because of that odd new round. It isn't proven yet and could well be a lemon.

    Why not the 30? 11 rounds of real .45 ACP in a very compact and reliable-as-a-brick package is hard to argue with! :)

    So that said, I'd get both the full-size 1911 and a G30.

    They're both too nice to not have.

    :)
     
  5. clubsoda22

    clubsoda22 member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,718
    Location:
    SE PA
    I like glocks for what they are, but i grew up shooting a 1911. And despite how intriguing those little plastic pistols are, i've got a taurus, bersa, HK, and still no glock...no glock even in the cards yet. It's way down the list. Buy colt, good gun, be happy.
     
  6. Drjones

    Drjones member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,803
    Another reason you should get both:

    Both are entirely user-serviceable.

    You can completely disassemble and replace parts as needed on both guns.

    I really like that about my Glocks.
     
  7. Longbow

    Longbow Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    1,145
    Location:
    City by the big lake
    In this case, I'll pick the Colt. Think resale value! :)
     
  8. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    Both are extremely fine weapons; but I'd
    have too go with the COLT.

    Best Wishes,
    Ala Dan, N.R.A. Life Member
     
  9. Sean Smith

    Sean Smith Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,922
    Colt, duh. Especially since we are talking about a Glock 37. :D
     
  10. Phantom Warrior

    Phantom Warrior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2003
    Messages:
    1,073
    Don't get me wrong, I love Glocks. Check out my sig line if you doubt me. But a Colt is going to be a lot tougher to find again than a Glock is. There will always be Glocks. I'd say jump on the Colt now and buy the Glock next.
     
  11. phorvick

    phorvick Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2003
    Messages:
    502
    Location:
    NW MN
    If anything I am a Glock oriented person. However, the G37 is not on my list. The G21 though...........great gun
     
  12. Pebcac

    Pebcac Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    323
    Location:
    Between a computer and a chair near Memphis, TN
    Get the Colt. I let a Series 80 blued Commander go for a Glock 19, and it was a serious error in judgment. The Colt was just, well, nicer. Plus, you're looking at an as yet unproven round. I'd get the Colt now, and take a wait-and-see attitude on the .45 Glock round.
     
  13. tc300mag1

    tc300mag1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,913
    Location:
    Wayne, Mi
    The colt for sure .. you can always find a glock at decent price but usually cant find a deal on a colt
     
  14. sm

    sm member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    28,389
    Location:
    Between black coffee, and shiftn' gears
    Colt
     
  15. Nero Steptoe

    Nero Steptoe member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    461
    I like my Glocks, but don't have any use for the .45GAP. Given the choices that you name, I'd pick the Colt. If my other choice were a G30, I'd take the G30...for my purposes. Lightweight, 11 rounds of .45ACP, takes pre-ban, 13-rd. G21 mags, accurate, soft-shooting.
     
  16. Black Majik

    Black Majik Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    5,031
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    Without even thinking twice the choice is the Colt Commander.

    1911 > Glocks :neener:
     
  17. artherd

    artherd member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,518
    Location:
    An Elevated Position in the Bay Area, PRK
    I'm not a huge fan of either gun (though I've yet to even handle a 37!) Overall I am a big Glock fan, and not a fan of the small-frame 1911 designs. The full-size just *point so much better* for me.

    It will largely be up to what points and fits well for you. If you can however, I would recomend looking at a .45ACP Glock (ie G30) instead of the .45GAP(G37), unless you really want to try something new and won't *ever* need to find ammo for it in some kind of emergency situation.


    All that asside, the .45GAP does look like a better cartridge than the .45ACP on nearly all counts. But not by terribly much.

    Personally, I want a G20 in 10mm AUTO !
     
  18. ajacobs

    ajacobs Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    519
    Location:
    VT, USA
    I would never by the 37, who want a gun that fires expensive ammo that is hard to find and will probally not be able to be purchased at all in a few years.
     
  19. chickenfried

    chickenfried Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2003
    Messages:
    497
    Even if the Colt was more expensive, I'd say the Colt. At the SAME PRICE it's a no brainer, definitely the Colt.
     
  20. XavierBreath

    XavierBreath Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    5,054
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Colt. That was easy.
     
  21. ReadyontheRight

    ReadyontheRight Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,335
    Location:
    Minnesota - nine months of ice and snow...three mo
  22. dsk

    dsk Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    774
    Steelharp,

    I don't know about the LEO community, but if you do a search on thse forums regarding the new .45GAP you'll notice it hasn't exactly received a warm welcome in the civilian shooting community. It may eventually catch on, but I have a strong suspicion it'll just go the way of the .41 Action Express after a few years. Those who usually choose a .45 want a REAL .45, either ACP or Long Colt!
     
  23. Steelharp

    Steelharp Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    957
    Location:
    Gallatin, TN
    Thanks, guys. You all just affirmed my heart... it will be the Colt. There was just a passing interest in the Glock; I handled one today, and the grip felt comfortable. But, with a Combat Elite and a WWI repro in my case already, I knew it needed to be the Colt. Now, I just have to hear from my buddy... if I can get the '75 Combat Commander from him, or the new blued Commander... of those, which would you pick? The older one, or the new one?

    Mikey D...
     
  24. Preacherman

    Preacherman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,309
    Location:
    Louisiana, USA
    The new Colts have had a serious upgrade in quality control - ones I've seen recently have been really excellent. I'd go for the new-production gun.
     
  25. dsk

    dsk Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    774
    For me it would have to depend on how good the '75 CC was built. If it looks as good as a new one I'd prefer it, simply because I don't like the Series 80 in a Commander or Officers ACP-sized 1911. The reason has to do with the thin bridge of metal alongside the disconnector cutout in the slide, which is thinner on the shorter Colts. I had two Commanders give me problems in that area due to the hammer peening that part of the slide badly. It's hard for me to explain, but I know what I'm talking about, honestly. :scrutiny:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page