What was it about the article that you call it a bunch of bull?
Most of it IMHO. The blatantly outdated and/or wrong info that jumped out at me was.
The incorrect statement of “9mm ammunition is available in two
pressure levels…” Lets try at least 3 (standard, +P, and +P+)
The questionable statement of “the best 9mm Luger load for self-defense: it is the Cor-Bon 9mm 115 grain +P Jacketed Hollowpoint” 115 grain? Who thinks a tiny 115grain is the best choice? Also In recent tests I have seen, the Federal HST beats the Cor-Bons.
The statement of “Other excellent standard pressure 9mm loads are the Winchester Silvertip 115 grain (X9MMSHP), and Federal 124 grain Hydra-shok (P9HS1)”. These were state of the art 15years ago. Now both are outdated and ineffective because they tend to plug easily causing them not to expand.
He also recommends some of the lightest bullets at standard pressure rounds. 115 gr
The ill-informed and/or outdated warnings against using the very effective 147 grain loads.
Then he goes on to list some of the bad loads out there you should NEVER carry. Problem is some in this list he just recommended a few lines up… A few in that list are actually good choices and recommend carry ammo.
Need I even say anything about his list of First class, Second class, and Third class pistols…
Other than what I pointed out. It was a GREAT article.