Folks- this one is for all of you political science/sociologist types. I have no empirical data to support it (yet), but I have always felt that the rise of organized crime in the U.S. during the early part of the 20th century was aided and abetted by a policy of strict gun control in the cities/regions where they eventually developed their strongest networks. New York and New Jersey come immediately to mind, especially with the Sullivan Law being implemented in 1912.
I am not in anyway suggesting that The Mob didn't (doesn't?) have it's tentacles in parts of the country where people are still free, such as the South/Southeast- it's just that historically, the wedge that The Mob seemed to use to gain a foothold in a community was the "protection" racket. In areas where the people were NOT disarmed by the government, I surmise that it was difficult for the "enforcer" to "collect" every week- when he realized that his own longevity might have been called in to question by the potential victim. Obviously not the case In N.Y./N.J., where the only people (practically speaking) were, and still are- the cops and the crooks.
Just a theory. Thoughts?
Have at it.
I am not in anyway suggesting that The Mob didn't (doesn't?) have it's tentacles in parts of the country where people are still free, such as the South/Southeast- it's just that historically, the wedge that The Mob seemed to use to gain a foothold in a community was the "protection" racket. In areas where the people were NOT disarmed by the government, I surmise that it was difficult for the "enforcer" to "collect" every week- when he realized that his own longevity might have been called in to question by the potential victim. Obviously not the case In N.Y./N.J., where the only people (practically speaking) were, and still are- the cops and the crooks.
Just a theory. Thoughts?
Have at it.