Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Orrin Hatch response to the AWB

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Correia, May 13, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Correia

    Correia Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    10,648
    Location:
    SLC
    I just got a letter back from Orrin Hatch, it was a form letter but it was specifically about the AWB. I take that as a good sign that we are making enough noise that they have a letter specifically set up for that topic. :)

    Basically it was very good. He said that he was against it the first time, and that he would do everything in his power to kill it this time. He even included some quotes he made the first time around.

    I take this as a good sign.

    Lets keep up the pressure.
     
  2. FPrice

    FPrice Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,380
    Location:
    People's Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    Larry...

    Congrats on the good luck with Senator Hatch. However my senators are Ted Kennedy and John Kerry. Guess how far I will get in trying to convince them to support our position?

    :banghead:
     
  3. AmericanFreeBird

    AmericanFreeBird Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    172
    Yeah, well my Senators are Joe "Sore Loserman" Lieberman and Chris "gun banner" Dodd. I wrote them anyway, no reason not to let them off the hook just because they will totally ignore me.
     
  4. CZ-75

    CZ-75 member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    1,788
    Location:
    BFE

    You could always send them a petition asking that Sirhan Sirhan be pardoned.

    :evil:
     
  5. Sactown

    Sactown Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,238
    Location:
    NorCal
    I'm stuck with the likes of Feinstein and Boxer. :fire:
     
  6. Shaggy

    Shaggy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    74
    Location:
    Ohio
    Kennedy, Boxer and all the rest need to get the mail to. Keep the heat on guys. I know if those morons are your rpes it's tough, but you still have to shout loudly and shout often.
     
  7. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    The letter from Senator Hatch is good news for all of his since Senator Hatch, or as I like to call him - the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, wields quite a bit of influence over this bill.
     
  8. Wildalaska

    Wildalaska member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    5,296
    Location:
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Ill be meeting with my Senators shortly and will tell them what I think...

    WildinalaskayoucandothatAlaska
     
  9. Outrigger

    Outrigger Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    60
    Location:
    Vermont
    you could have leahy and turncoat jeffords. a letter will do no good here.
     
  10. TarpleyG

    TarpleyG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,981
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Here are links to Florida's senators. I do not really know where Bill Nelson stands. I think maybe he misunderstood what the issue is. :scrutiny:

    Looks like Bob Graham is on the fence. Maybe someone else with more knowledge/interest in politics can tell me.

    Bob Graham on Gun Control
    Bill Nelson on Gun Control
     
  11. MeekandMild

    MeekandMild Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,877
    Hatch for president in 2004!
     
  12. HBK

    HBK member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Messages:
    1,430
    Location:
    A liberal hellhole: Olympia, WA.
    My rep is Baird and my senator is Cantwell. I'll be joining you in the :banghead: .
     
  13. Waitone

    Waitone Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    5,406
    Location:
    The Land of Broccoli and Fingernails
    Surely you jest! I coined the term "spinelessrepublican" in honor of Trent Lott, a man who would do nothing to stand for principal and would cave at the slightest pressure from the opposition.

    Orin Hatch is a Xerox copy of Trent Lott. He is a man who talks big on Sunday and goes to whimpering on Monday.

    Republicans got smart and did in Lott. Now they have to get smart and do in Hatch. Watch Hatch carefully. I think there is a deal afoot for the democrats to accept and pass the gun manufacturers liability control bill in exchange for the republicans passing the AWB extension. Watch Hatch. He's key to any deals.
     
  14. WilderBill

    WilderBill Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    544
    Location:
    Texas
    Even if you are represented by Satin him/herself, don't let them be feeling too comfortable with their idiocy. :cuss:
    Keep the pressure on!
     
  15. antsi

    antsi Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,398
    Write 'em all, ESPECIALLY if they're Anti-Gun

    You folks are right in the sense that no constituent letter is likely to change your legislator's mind. By the time we hear about the bill, most of them have already made up their minds.

    But that doesn't mean it isn't worth it to write the letters.

    A polite, well-reasoned letter from someone who appears to be a solid citizen does send a message to the legislator, even if the arguments themselves don't sway them. The message is either,

    a) "Gosh, my position on this bill is really costing me votes back home."

    or

    b) "Gosh, my position on this bill is solidifying the support from my voter base."

    Even if you don't change their minds, it's worthwhile letting them know whether they are gaining or losing votes based on what they are doing.

    A corollary of this is, it really doesn't pay to come off as a dyed-in-the-wool nut-case single-issue fanatic when writing letters to your congressfolk, especially the anti's. They will just ignore you, figuring they'll never get your vote anyway. And anything you say that sounds crazy to them will only solidify their opinion that only crazy people could object to their position. It makes you so much easier to dismiss.

    Far better to portray yourself as one of the middle-road "swing voters" that they're all so desperate to seduce. Make your own position seem reasonable and mainstream, while politely suggesting the anti's views are the extreme ones.
     
  16. TheOtherOne

    TheOtherOne Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    1,422
    Location:
    Ogden
    I like the guy because of all the politicians I've wrote in the last 6 months he's the ONLY one to respond to me. (other than the automated one you immediately get back from the whitehouse when you e-mail the President). In response to an e-mail I sent to Hatch, he actually sent a hand-signed letter in the mail. It was mostly a form letter, but did address my message and it was actually signed.

    But, I can see where you are coming from after looking through the site posted above and finding things like this:

    Hatch was the author of the juvenile crime bill passed by the US Senate in May. Among other things, it would require trigger locks on all new handguns and impose tougher restrictions on sales at gun shows. The measure also would ban import of high-capacity ammunition clips and any juvenile convicted of a felony would be denied the right to purchase a gun for life.
     
  17. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    To be fair to Hatch, he proposed that bill when it looked like a far worse bill from the Dems was going to pass during the post-Columbine battle in Congress. The split over the two bills ended up doing both of them in and I notice Hatch hasn't proposed any legislation of that sort since the storm passed.
     
  18. Bainx

    Bainx member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,271
    Location:
    East TN
    You got him pegged, Waitone.
    He is also elbow-rubbin' buddies with Teddy Kennedy.
     
  19. Kharn

    Kharn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,999
    Location:
    Maryland
    Hey, I've got Mikulski and Sarbanes, they just send me the same "Thanks for supporting protecting the chillllrrunnnn" form letter they send the antis... :barf:

    Kharn
     
  20. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    Waitone:

    Just curious, but why do you think the deal would be to trade gun manufacturer liability control for an extension of the AWB, and not the other way around?
     
  21. Waitone

    Waitone Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    5,406
    Location:
    The Land of Broccoli and Fingernails
    Perhaps I'm not clear. Dubya has already dismissed AWB as an important issue. However, he is interested in liability limitation. Democrats taking aim at liability limitation via filibuster is a threat to what Dubya and republicans think as important.

    I figure it is easy to trade something of marginal value for something of intense value.
     
  22. Telperion

    Telperion Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,482
    Location:
    Oregon
    Huh? Why trade the AWB, which they've acknowledged has generated loads of angry individual feedback, for the liability bill that is desirable but has only indirect effects on voters? I'll concede that it's not an impossible scenario, but it doesn't seem like a good way to win votes.
     
  23. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    I agree with pipsqueek...

    The AWB cost the Democrats the House after it was passed.

    The same thing will happen to the Republicans if they renew it.

    Maybe I am missing part of the puzzle, but I didnt realize that Bush was particularly interested in liability reform for manufacturers.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page