Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Over Penetration

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Aaryq, Apr 29, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Aaryq

    Aaryq Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,039
    Location:
    ND Resident, Stationed out of CA, Moving to NC
    Howdy folks. I found this video while browsing around on the internet looking for ballistics tests. It's about weapons commonly employed by the US military and the insurgents. Granted, when you see the flak jackets in the video, you can tell the structural integrity of the vests are comprimised early on. Regardless, it's a real eye opener when it comes to penetration.

    Critique and enjoy
    Part 1
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=dKhMOfaYwvE

    Part 2
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=w22M1DAQ59I
     
  2. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    In love and war, there is no such thing as too much penetration.
     
  3. Aaryq

    Aaryq Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,039
    Location:
    ND Resident, Stationed out of CA, Moving to NC
    I saw that video and just by the performance of the round (not talking about weight, accuracy, and things of that nature) it makes me feel a little undergunned with my M16A2, especially knowing that the enemy will usually be IN the buildings and I will be OUTSIDE.
     
  4. glockman19

    glockman19 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,699
    I would liket to see a comparison of the penetration of the M1A and the AR-15/M16.
     
  5. Gunpacker

    Gunpacker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2004
    Messages:
    532
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    M1A would have the same penetration as the medium machine gun and the sniper rifle. All of them are 7.62 Nato.
    Looks like the M4 is not the best thing to have in any kind of warfare.
    Lack of penetration that gives the enemy the ability to shoot thru your cover while you can't shoot thru his, is a continuing deficit of the .223 round. In Viet Nam, it was trees that could give the enemy cover, while giving US troops only concealment. Bad situation. Now the same thing is obviously a problem with mud bricks and cement block structures in the middle east. Seems we can't make good procurement decisions.
    The AK system seems to be a far better bullet choice. Doesn't help to have a lot of bullets if they won't penetrate the enemy's cover. Not all the bad guys stand out in the open.
     
  6. never_retreat

    never_retreat Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    454
    Location:
    PRNJ
    Over penetration? No such thing.:evil:
     
  7. tasco 74

    tasco 74 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    855
    Location:
    iowa u.s.a.
    i'd like to see an impact photo or tape of the penitration of a .50 bmg round from a friend of mines mc bros bolt gun at say 100 yards out!!:what: that would have to leave a mark!............................:cool:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page