ScottsGT
Member
By me on another forum, non gun related. Here's my post followed by another member. Anyone want to help me argue my point, keeping the spirit of The High Road, of course!
I will not do business with paypal. They place too many restrictions on everything, and they are anti 2nd amendment. (owned by E-bay too)
Not to try to start an argument here, but how do you make the leap from PayPal not allowing their services to be used for the sale (legal or otherwise) of firearms and related items to the 2nd Amendment? Where does it say in their policy that they're against the 2nd Amendment? I don't read anything whatsoever about it in there.
Given the litigious nature of Americans, I don't blame them for not wanting their name associated with the sale (legal or otherwise) of weapons and related items. When whacko A kills innocent victim B and some lawyer finds out he bought the gun (legally or otherwise) and paid for it using PayPal and sues PayPal as a result, I can see their point. Are all institutions that impose any sort of restriction whatsoever on the unlimited right to buy and bear as as many guns as you can stuff into your pockets all of necessity anti-2nd Amendment? I didn't think so...
Just an observation...
I will not do business with paypal. They place too many restrictions on everything, and they are anti 2nd amendment. (owned by E-bay too)
Not to try to start an argument here, but how do you make the leap from PayPal not allowing their services to be used for the sale (legal or otherwise) of firearms and related items to the 2nd Amendment? Where does it say in their policy that they're against the 2nd Amendment? I don't read anything whatsoever about it in there.
Given the litigious nature of Americans, I don't blame them for not wanting their name associated with the sale (legal or otherwise) of weapons and related items. When whacko A kills innocent victim B and some lawyer finds out he bought the gun (legally or otherwise) and paid for it using PayPal and sues PayPal as a result, I can see their point. Are all institutions that impose any sort of restriction whatsoever on the unlimited right to buy and bear as as many guns as you can stuff into your pockets all of necessity anti-2nd Amendment? I didn't think so...
Just an observation...