Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Perpetual search for perfect 1911

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Rival, Aug 15, 2004.

?

Which 1911 would you take?

  1. Les Baer TRS

    15 vote(s)
    27.8%
  2. Wilson CQB

    14 vote(s)
    25.9%
  3. Springfield Pro

    15 vote(s)
    27.8%
  4. Valtro 1998A1

    10 vote(s)
    18.5%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Rival

    Rival Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    255
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Down to four - which one would you recommend over the other ones?
    I really like all four of them about equal, is there anything I should know?
     
  2. Tamara

    Tamara Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    9,325
    Location:
    Hoosieropolis
    A lot depends on what you want to use it for.

    I don't have as much experience with the Valtro as the other three, but all of them that I've seen in person are awful purtily blued and sport adjustable sights, neither of which is my first choice for a totin' gun.

    The TRS is also blued, and comes from the factory with a single-sided thumb safety and slim grips. Easily changed, but again, not my personal cup of blood 'n' brimstone on a carry piece.

    The CQB and Pro are much of a muchness in the finish department, but the CQB comes with front slide serrations and 30-lpi checkering and the single-sided safety, and I personally prefer the Pro's 20-lpi, ambis, and lack of forward serrations. From the examples I've seen, the Pros seem to be fitted up slightly better, too, but I'm working from relatively small sample sizes.

    You rarely meet an unsatisfied owner of any one of the four, however.
     
  3. tlhelmer

    tlhelmer Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    579
    Location:
    Southern Indiana
    Neither, Kimber Custom II TLE-RL would be my choice. 100 % reliable.
     
  4. Rival

    Rival Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    255
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Now that last post was funny... Kimber is not in the same league. Not by a long shot. I'd take my Springfield Loaded over any Kimber Custom II.
     
  5. denfoote

    denfoote Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,622
    Location:
    Near the border of occupied Azlan and Mexico.
    I don't have the Pro, but the Loaded.
    It's as close to the perfect 1911 as I ever need to get!!! :D
    IMHO, Kimbers are :barf: !!!!!
     
  6. Rival

    Rival Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    255
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Yeah, that's the problem. You can never get too close...
     
  7. shep854

    shep854 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    952
    Location:
    Birmingham AL
    You left one off; a plain-Jane, milspec, stock GI M1911A1. Everything else is gilding the lily.
     
  8. ddj8052

    ddj8052 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2003
    Messages:
    331
    Location:
    Nipomo, CA
    I nominate the Ed Brown Kobra Carry :cool:
     
  9. strambo

    strambo Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Messages:
    3,929
    Location:
    Oregon
    Spring. Milspec (or other basic colt/kimber etc...) and send it to a top smith for some work...can end up with a custom gun for the same price (if your tastes aren't too extravegant) that will be better for you than all of the above. $450.00 for a milspec leaves you $1350+ for custom work and shipping until you get to the $1800+ price of the others. Downside is the long wait...

    Wish I had experience with those guns...but I'm saving my pennies up to take my own advice... [Yost 1* package with retro rear sight, serrated front strap and lower/flare ejection port and I'll have about $400 left over from the price of the Les Baer I used to want]
     
  10. Black_Talon

    Black_Talon Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2003
    Messages:
    863
    Location:
    Peoples Republik of **********
    Never handled a Valtro but I've had multiple opportunities to handle the Baer, Wilson and SA Pro. For me, it was a reasonably easy decision to buy the SA Pro. As a matter of fact, I bought two.
     
  11. cratz2

    cratz2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,233
    Location:
    Central IN
    My experience with Baers has every so slightly scared me off from them... And the Valtro, while a beautiful gun, I just don't consider quite on par with the others.

    Once I'd put 500 trouble-free rounds through them, I'd be happy with either the Wilson or the Pro but if it was free, I'd take the Pro.
     
  12. dev_null

    dev_null Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,338
    Location:
    Austin TX
    Perfect for what?

    I've heard good things about the Valtro, but frankly I could buy three perfectly good Springfields and a boatload of ammo for the price of one of them.

    As for me, my Kimber is perfect for my purposes.

    - 0 -
     
  13. Bill Z

    Bill Z Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    333
    Location:
    Augusta
    Ed Brown would be my choice.
     
  14. Vitamin G

    Vitamin G Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2003
    Messages:
    934
    Location:
    Monroeville, PA (Home of the Zombies)
    My dream gun would be similar to my Kimber TLE. Honestly.

    My only changes would be straight 8 night sights, thin grips, and either the "wave" pattern of conamyds instead of the checkering on the frontstrap. I just can't get used to checkering :(
     
  15. Berg01

    Berg01 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2003
    Messages:
    712
    No such thing as "best" or "perfect"; I have an SW1911 with the adjustable rear sight; for me, it fits its intended purpose as a nice shooting range / target gun very nicely, and I'm very happy with it. I can highly recommend one to anybody interested in a 1911.
     
  16. 45auto

    45auto Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,241
    I haven't shot one, but you might as well throw Rock River in there as a viable alternative...not that you need any more. :) I don't think you can go wrong with any of your choices.

    I read great things about Rock River, good pricing for that category, and it appears you may have more flexability in options, for the same price, if you wish.

    Good luck
     
  17. Dave Sample

    Dave Sample member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,022
    Location:
    Prescott, AZ
    None of the Above.
     
  18. cratz2

    cratz2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,233
    Location:
    Central IN
    Ezackerly! :p

    Most of the folks that knock any of the four are folks that don't own any of the four. Or well known smiths that would rather have a Colt tweaked to their likeness.... Right, Dave?

    But if you have the cash, for an off the shelf piece, the Pro is pretty tough to beat in my book.
     
  19. mmike87

    mmike87 Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    911
    Location:
    Charlottesville, VA
    I'd tend towards the TRS, then possibly the Wilson, because there is a chance you'd get to handle one of them in a shop somewhere. The Pro and the Valtro are much more rare, at least I have never seen them in any shop, anywhere.

    The biggest reason I picked my Baer Super-Tac was simply that I was able to find one an hour away that I could actually see before forking down my $1900.

    I doubt that any of the 4 would be disappointing, however.
     
  20. C96

    C96 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    419
    Location:
    Mid-Willamette Valley Oregon
    You oughta add Ted Yost to the poll. I'm saving my bucks to go there. :D

    allan
     
  21. Rich357

    Rich357 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2003
    Messages:
    313
    Hi Rival,

    Do you want this perfect 1911 for carry?

    I have a Valtro and Les Baer TRS. They both shoot very well. Fixed sights are more rugged. The TRS isn't offered with the 1.5" option.

    I'm sure you would enjoy a Les Baer SRP with the 1.5" option or if you want adjustable sights the LB Super Tac with the 1.5" option.

    The LB 1.5" option seems to make the pistol smoother out of the box.

    My Les Baer 5" Ultimate Master with the 1.5" option is very smooth. It shoots great, no failures. It's an outstanding range pistol.

    Rich
     
  22. Coronach

    Coronach Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,109
    I tend to lean this way as well, but I'm also not a really huge 1911 guy. The only things I could consider changing are:

    1. Sights. I have a sistema. The sights on it are...suboptimal.

    2. Trigger job, and general fluff and buff, if needed.

    3. hammer bob, if it bites.

    4. The milspec safety is a bit small. If you have trouble working it, change it out.

    Everything else, to me, is just fiddling around. Note that 3 of these 4 are 'if needed' and user-specific. Heck, some people like milspec sights, too. So I guess they all are. ;)

    Mike
     
  23. 19112XS

    19112XS Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2003
    Messages:
    224
  24. WhoKnowsWho

    WhoKnowsWho Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    3,432
    Location:
    Maricopa, AZ
    Depending on what a person needs... I think both the Springfield Mil-Spec or any custom piece could be perfect...
     
  25. Matt G

    Matt G Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    3,547
    Location:
    N. TX
    Honestly, they all are quality pistols.

    But what are you wanting them to do? Target use? IDPA? Carry? Duty? Hunting? Bullseye?

    Can you accept a pistol that gives you 5" groups at 25 yards, but will work every time? How 'bout 3"/25y?

    Out of box accuracy for my Kimber, with FLGR removed, was in the neighborhood of 2.5"/25y. I don't know for sure, because I simply can't shoot that well. That said, it feeds EVERYthing, and came bobbed and with a wonderful trigger.

    I have to say, with my big hands and mediocre eyes, the better sights, moderately (sensibly) extended safeties, bobbed hammers and slightly-extended grip safety tangs are necessities for any pistol that I make my main duty gun. The fact that I walked out of the store with a new one that came standard with all that, plus a beveled magazine well, was just excellent. All of the above have such such options with throating, and are good guns. But some are built to tighter tolerances than others. If they promise you SOOOOOPER-tight groups, that means that the mechanism is built to minimal tolerances. That means you're likely to have to trade accuracy for reliability. It's actually very possible that the less expensive pistol could be preferably, given such critera.

    Not that I'm knocking MilSpec. I'll later post some nice little groups that I shot with a milspec 1911 that our PD just got from the DOD on a grant of some surplus guns. From 20 yards, they all stay on the "Little Man Behind The rock" (top left corner silohuette on silouhuette target) with old loads. But the trigger needs work, the sights are too low, the hammer bit me, and my big long thumb kept missing the safety.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page