Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Petition to remove restrictions on short barrel rifles and shotguns.

Discussion in 'Activism Discussion and Planning' started by Kush, Oct 13, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kush

    Kush Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2010
    Messages:
    132
  2. alsaqr

    alsaqr Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,280
    Location:
    South Western, OK
    The white house cannot unilaterally remove the restrictions on SBR/SBS. It's codified in federal law. Contact your congressman and ask him to propose legislation changing the National Firearms Act.
     
  3. Kush

    Kush Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2010
    Messages:
    132
    No, but the president can say that he wants it, then congress writes a bill on it and passes it, like his health care bill.
     
  4. WardenWolf

    WardenWolf member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    5,884
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    This President is just as likely to ask them to change the law to require all machine guns and other NFA devices be forfeited. Is this really the administration you want to push this under? Even if it passed Congress it would almost assuredly be vetoed.
     
  5. TexasBill

    TexasBill Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,126
    Location:
    Texas Gulf Coast
    The real question is whether any administration, Democrat, Republican, or vegetarian, would push removal of the restrictions. Perhaps modifying them to allow ownership of the 14-inch-barreled shotguns used by law enforcement would politically possible (it could be presented as allowing LEOs to own them as personal weapons).

    Right now, the President is in a position where he doesn't want to alienate any more voters than he already has. While neither party wants to admit it, Congress is in the same boat: their approval ratings are even lower than Obama's.

    We all know Obama is not pro-gun and Eric Holder has gone off the deep end in his efforts. However, Obama is still a very bright politician and knows that gun control issues are losers for him. He needs what political capital he still has for more pressing business.
     
  6. heiliggeiste

    heiliggeiste Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    1
    Even if it was passed or removed on the Federal Level, you would still have to have States remove it from State Law.
     
  7. Owen Sparks

    Owen Sparks member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2007
    Messages:
    4,524
    Wait until we get a better president.
     
  8. Neverwinter

    Neverwinter Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,049
    Not to rain on the parade, but given the responses to the last few successful petitions I would not expect much beyond a brush off or posting of scientific inaccuracies to support the status quo.
     
  9. alsaqr

    alsaqr Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,280
    Location:
    South Western, OK
    It's easy, just find a gun friendly congressman to sponsor the legislation. Better idea yet, have him sponsor a bill eliminating the GCA 1968. Surely lots of pro-gunners in congress are willing to do that. :D
     
  10. kennyb313

    kennyb313 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    5
    Location:
    Piedmint , NC
    Just pay the $200 tax!
     
  11. MikeRussell

    MikeRussell Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2007
    Messages:
    178
    Location:
    Carencro, LA
    Just pay the tax enacted by the Stamp Act.

    Sounds pretty familiar. There are too many taxes and too many government restrictions in our lives already...we need to get rid of as many as we can.
     
  12. Neverwinter

    Neverwinter Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,049
    That really isn't a comparable example, given that the primary objection was taxation without representation. The states did have representation when the NFA tax was instituted. That's misguided rhetoric.
     
  13. Strykervet

    Strykervet member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,610
    Yeah, but the way this thing works is that if he doesn't like it, nothing happens. There were a lot of petitions that got a LOT of signatures that he didn't address. The whole thing was a sham, just a stunt to make you THINK you were getting grievances addressed. Would have been pretty cool had he manned up to it and gave the people what they wanted whether or not it conflicted with his or his party's ideals.

    It is essentially what congress is supposed to do, but those sellouts don't really work for us anymore. I can't forsee it getting overturned in my lifetime short of a big change in DC. It'd be nice though. The $200 fee isn't really the issue, the highly inflated prices are.
     
  14. kozak6

    kozak6 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Messages:
    890
    Location:
    Arizona
    [quote="whitehouse.gov]The petition you are trying to access has expired, because it failed to meet the signature threshold. [/quote]

    Hmm.

    These petitions as a general concept are fascinating. Have any of them at all, firearm related or not, reached any significant threshold?
     
  15. Sam Cade

    Sam Cade Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    5,228
    Location:
    Rural Kentucky, surrounded by Amish
    No, since there is no mechanism for the petition to acquire legal weight. These petitions are just a tool to dissipate political dissatisfaction.

    "I did my part, I signed a PETITION."


    The best case scenario is this:
    So... yeah, it is a waste of time.
    On-line petitions are not a valid way to leverage your social capital.


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_petition
     
  16. RhinoDefense

    RhinoDefense Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    883
    No, petitions are stupid and online petitions even more so.
     
  17. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,566
    IIRC, the President sneered at the "little people out there clinging to their guns and their religion." He, like many "progressives" claiming to be populist, has an abiding hatred of what he considers low class scum and he is much more likely to support a ban on both guns and religion (other than Islam) than to relax any current restrictions.

    Jim
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page