Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Picture this next excersise in futility.

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by NMGonzo, May 8, 2012.

  1. NMGonzo

    NMGonzo Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,691
    Location:
    Albuquerque & Santa Fe
    My long project is a .460 rowland for my stainless springer

    BUT ... as I was holstering today, I realize that It would be convenient to have a 3 inch or so slide and barrel to slap on the full size frame.

    Tank Commander style.

    Can it be done without getting silly?
     
  2. Fishslayer

    Fishslayer Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,936
    Location:
    People's Republik
    Are you talking about a 3" in .460 Rowland?:eek:

    I'd LOVE to try it out!:D

    Wonder what kind of recoil spring that would require...
     
  3. NMGonzo

    NMGonzo Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,691
    Location:
    Albuquerque & Santa Fe
    No ... i want the 3 inch for the .45

    One lower, multiple upper depending how i feel that day.
     
  4. 45Fan

    45Fan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    Messages:
    337
    Location:
    Indiana
    I cannot positively say that it is impossible, but the shorter slide 1911 has a different frame. Not just the grip is different, though I cannot give the specifics of the two, I do know that the rest of the frame also has different measurements as well.
     
  5. Drail

    Drail Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,927
    Plan on buying a lot of recoil springs because it will eat them like candy. It will really need a shock buff and there is no room for one in a 3 in. Personally I wouldn't bother. It will beat the gun and follow up shots will be very difficult. The flash will blind everybody within about 30 feet of the gun.
     
  6. Skylerbone

    Skylerbone Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,354
    In short, no. The slide's spring tunnel is shorter and its rear face sets further back. The rails are also shortened as is the dust cover. You'd need a FLGR to retain the spring on the 5" if you cut the dust cover which will expose the recoil spring at the bottom, if not you'll have about .6" of dust cover sitting forward of the slide while in battery. I don't know how much stroke is lost but a commander slide on a Govt. frame will be .25" loss of rearward travel. Both slides would also require fitting to the frame rails likely making both a less than ideal fit. Finally, you'll have to consider the ejector and whether or not an extended would work for both uppers.

    Essentially you'll end up with (if it works) two horrible looking pistols, both likely compromised in function rather than the full size/compact duo you're hoping for. After parts, finishing and professional help you would likely be money, time and headaches ahead to buy a second pistol. For .45 ACP I'd recommend a Colt or Kimber.
     

Share This Page