Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Piers babbling bad for us? Not!

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by KMatch, Jan 18, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. KMatch

    KMatch Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2012
    Messages:
    201
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Q2btKEnfuA4

    Video of Piers being debated by 2 women. He loses and even wads up and throws his script. The women lose as well IMO as everyone's really talking over each other as usual. I see it as he's a babbling idiot and actually makes his side look like losers. Anyone disagree? Sure, he's getting attention, but is it really the attention the antis are seeking?

    The one outstanding vid of him getting it handed to him, was by Ted Nugent, believe it or not. Ted spoke over him in a way he had NO way of getting a word in and made great points. Ask and I'll post a link if it hasn't been done. It's almost a year old so likely been posted.
     
  2. gym

    gym member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    5,903
    When did he become the authority on laws and guns in America? The best thing that we can all do is not watch him, I only saw him at the gym, because it was already on the tv, I won't tune in his show.
    He always his an ass about everything. If you watched him on "The Apprentice", you would understand he has a personality flaw. He can't stand anyone who does anything better than he does, or is smarter.
    He just talks over people like the old timers like "Joe Pine" and several others, theyramble on and shut you down. It's tragic that we allow this type of news show on CNN which used to be a respectable network during the 80's and 90's, I remember watching live reporting from battle zones, when no one else would go there.
     
  3. radiotom

    radiotom Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    332
    I think he has more estrogen than his guests did.
     
  4. throdgrain

    throdgrain Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    Messages:
    829
    Location:
    South of London
    He's a wanker, please keep him over there :eek:
     
  5. youngda9

    youngda9 member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    877
    His strategy is to get the opponent to agree to some extreme position and then claim that discredits anything they actually have to say about the subject being discussed.

    +1 wanker
     
  6. CoRoMo

    CoRoMo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2007
    Messages:
    8,925
    Location:
    Californicated Colorado
    Okay these Piers Morgan threads need to be banned. The guy gets almost no viewers relatively speaking.
    What he does on his show should not matter.
     
  7. Tommygunn

    Tommygunn Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    4,462
    Location:
    Morgan County, Alabama
    Gee, thanks a LOT!:cuss:












    ;)
     
  8. Airbrush Artist

    Airbrush Artist member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    333
    Location:
    Kettering,Ohio
    Girly man through and Through ,Hope he never goes to prison...
     
  9. JohnBiltz

    JohnBiltz Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Messages:
    1,478
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Well personally just about any European lecturing Americans on just about any subject generally has a negative effect on me. When it comes to guns America and the British views on guns were established at Concord and just went down hill from there.
     
  10. Blackstone

    Blackstone Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2011
    Messages:
    718
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    It's because our government love us so much and want to look after us, and it makes us want to spread the love ;)
     
  11. KMatch

    KMatch Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2012
    Messages:
    201
    Personally, I can't see any reason to be offended. If he had any clue, maybe, but he's all out of useful data after 2 sentences. Yes, guns can be dangerous and yes, assault type weapons were used in the last 4 mass murders. That's his whole defense. So every time he brings in a new guest, he uses those arguments and the guest likely brings up fresh material the previous left out. So, piece by piece, there's more and more data being presented on why high capacity mags are good, while the only defense against them is, "guns can be dangerous and assault weapons were used in the last 4 mass murders". See what I mean? Let the idiot ramble! His thought process ran out LOOOOONG ago and as a result, we get more and more broadcast against his idiocy. Then, when we're done with him, let me know where to send the funds for my part of his return ticket to home.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page