Hi everyone.
I have been looking for some evidence in the form of actual tests whether a semi-automatic handgun can be used accurately from 50 meters range.
During the process I came across these test results http://thegunforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=108&start=0
The person here is testing four handguns --> a Russian Baikal MP446, Serbian CZ999, an NP22 & a Taurus PT99.
Among these, the accuracy from the PT99 and NP22 were the better ones. He scored 130/200 and 120/200 respectively with these two handguns.
Now my questions are:
1) Do these results prove that it is indeed possible to shoot at a human sized target accurately from such distance.
2) Is it possible that this shooter was more familiar with the PT99 and hence shot better with this particular gun as compared to others?
Feedbacks will be appreciated.
I have been looking for some evidence in the form of actual tests whether a semi-automatic handgun can be used accurately from 50 meters range.
During the process I came across these test results http://thegunforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=108&start=0
The person here is testing four handguns --> a Russian Baikal MP446, Serbian CZ999, an NP22 & a Taurus PT99.
Among these, the accuracy from the PT99 and NP22 were the better ones. He scored 130/200 and 120/200 respectively with these two handguns.
Now my questions are:
1) Do these results prove that it is indeed possible to shoot at a human sized target accurately from such distance.
2) Is it possible that this shooter was more familiar with the PT99 and hence shot better with this particular gun as compared to others?
Feedbacks will be appreciated.