Update
OP here, I just returned from the local range. My hope was to rent/shoot a P2000SK v3 (DA/SA), and a USPc v1 (DA/SA w/safety & decocker), both in 9mm.
Instead, because of rental availability, I shot the SK in .40 w/ LEM trigger (v2), and the USPc v1 in .45. :banghead:
So then to imagine a 9mm SK in DA/SA, I'm stuck mentally reducing the recoil in the SK, swapping the USPc DA/SA for the LEM, etc.
$77 later, I liked both guns very much, but in a way the trip kind of cooled my jets. If I did not already own a subcompact, I think I would prefer the SK over the 26, but since I already own a 26, and already paid to customize it w/ a thumb safety, at this precise moment I think I'm just going to hang with what I have - I can't justify taking a bath on the 26, then paying $800 for the HK. Money's not a big factor, but I hate to see it just plain wasted...
Perhaps I'll attend the next gunshow with the 26 for sale at a high enough price to totally get out from under it - if it sells, then I'll look to buy an SK. If it doesn't sell, maybe I'll look to the grip modification to make it fit better... Then I'll have so much invested I'll have to keep it forever!
(I think I might fish for advice on the grip reduction next)
If I keep the 26, maybe I'll add the USPc, then I'll have three sizes of 9mm guns with similar operationals - Glock 26 w/thumb safety, USPc v1, and Taurus PT92. (doesn't everyone need all three sizes?
)
No matter what, I think I'm done with buying Glocks - they're just not for me - and too much work and effort to make into what I want. I admit I was seduced by the $100 off for LEO...
Thanks to all that chimed in with advice...