Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

PLEASE SIGN WHITE HOUSE PETITION saying NO to AWB

Discussion in 'Activism' started by watson, Dec 24, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. watson

    watson Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    56
    Location:
    Olympia, WA
  2. Safety First

    Safety First Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    751
    Location:
    Middle Georgia area
  3. Nero_Atrum

    Nero_Atrum Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2008
    Messages:
    134
    Location:
    Miami
  4. Demitrios

    Demitrios Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    615
    Location:
    Northern NJ
    Signed.
     
  5. Byrd666

    Byrd666 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    666
    Location:
    Hill County, Texas
  6. reggie_love

    reggie_love Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    Messages:
    39
    Could somebody tell whoever it is that launched the petition to clean up the grammar and spelling? It's making us look pretty dumb.
     
  7. chris in va

    chris in va Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    6,097
    Location:
    Louisville KY
    Agreed. We need to work on our grammar a bit.
     
  8. 1911austin

    1911austin Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2003
    Messages:
    370
    Location:
    Austin, TX
  9. viper7342

    viper7342 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    106
    Location:
    In an underground bunker hiding from the STUPID LI
  10. gstockton

    gstockton Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2011
    Messages:
    13
  11. clamman

    clamman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Messages:
    240
    Location:
    Eastern nc
    You have to create an account on a government website? Not gonna happen.
     
  12. WSM MAGNUM

    WSM MAGNUM Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Messages:
    194
    Location:
    New Windsor, Maryland
    My thoughts exactly. There is no way I`m going to make myself a bigger target to this administration.
    Do I need to explain why?
     
  13. Carter

    Carter Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    1,434
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Signed and put on Facebook.
     
  14. Green Lantern

    Green Lantern Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,665
    Summary of proposed AWBII, and petition

    https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/pe...-feinstein-violating-her-oath-office/xhDvzZLM

    I wasn't entirely sure about signing it...till I also saw exactly what she proposes!

    http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/assault-weapons
     
  15. kmrcstintn

    kmrcstintn Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,236
    several variants of 'hunting' shotguns have started to incorporate thumbhole/pistol grip stocks for better ergonomcs while seated/crouching during turkey HUNTING;

    the background checks and weapons registration allows them to build a database that informs them who owns what and where they are...convenient for future confiscations!

    I really love that they DECIDE what an assault weapon is by THEIR definition (and that definintion will change as time goes on to include more and more SPORTING/HUNTING type firearms)
     
  16. herkyguy

    herkyguy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    1,364
    signed.
     
  17. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    48,353
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    It appears many people don't understand what the whitehouse.gov petitions are intended to accomplish.

    This doesn't do anything more than bring an issue to the attention of the White House staff.
    Bringing issues to their attention that they already are aware of isn't accomplishing anything. Petitions have to be focused on the Office of the President and can't be on things they President can't do. Keep them simple like "Commit to vetoing any AWB such as the Feinstein proposed AWB" and try not to dilute the effort by creating or signing a bunch of these. The only value in the whitehouse.gov petitions is to build one of the petitions as big as possible so the White House staffer reporting on the petitions sees 20 MILLION signatures on one telling the President to veto any AWB.

    In dealing with the Feinstein AWB the petition should be to ask the President to promise to veto the Feinstein proposed AWB as published because it is both unworkable (semiautomatic rifles can't be added to the category 2 of the NFA without amending the National Firearms Act), incorrect (AR type rifles are the fastest growing sporting use firearm in the hunting and competition sports) and unconstitutional in the face of SCOTUS confirmation of the individual nature of the 2A. It also ignores the root cause of mass murders and does not offer a practicable solution to keeping the few criminally insane who misused these firearms without treating all 221,000,000 adults in this country as if they were also criminally insane. There's a broader "No AWB" petition that has garnered the needed signatures, but more is better in this sense.

    We should also send similar short pleas to our elected officials at the local, state and congressional level. Each letter/email sent to each and every one of them has a multiplying effect. Just signing the petition and thinking you've done your part is dead wrong. The least we can do is tell every one of our elected officials that we do not want them to support an AWB and that the lessons learned from the former AWB should be taken to heart if they want to get through their next election cycle and return to their offices.
     
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2012
  18. gopguy

    gopguy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,190
    Location:
    S.W. Ohio
    I think a lot of folks who own pistols and shotguns are going to be surprised to learn they are "assault weapons".

    I also note beyond a NFA 1934 style registry that we would not be able to transfer these items. Forget passing to your kids or selling them. Get involved gang. As HSO said make your voice heard in Washington DC and if you are not a member of NRA or GOA its a good time to rectify that.
     
  19. JohnnyCremains

    JohnnyCremains Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Messages:
    282
    Oppose any new anti-gun legislation...and do it NOW!

    Fellow highroad friends, I urge you to contact your state representatives to voice your opposition to any proposed gun bans that are being drafted up in the wake of the terrible tragedy at Sandy Hook. Anti-gun politicians and the national media are using this tragedy to try to get new legislation passed to take more rights away from law abiding gun owners. This new legislation will do nothing to reduce or prevent gun violence just as the “Assault Weapons” Ban of 1994 did nothing to reduce or prevent gun violence.
    You must write your state representatives to be heard. Don’t wait, please do this now. Call them, e-mail them, or even write them physical letters voicing your opposition. They represent YOU as your elected officials. Millions of letters and calls cannot go ignored. Also write President Barack Obama. Yes he's anti gun but write him anyway. He needs to hear us regardless of his stance.
    Please, be respectful but firm in your unwavering support of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. And let them know you will NOT support anyone who votes for more gun control legislation.
    Please click on this very helpful NRA link that will give you all of the contact information for your state representatives:

    http://www.nraila.org/get-involved-locally/grassroots/write-your-reps.aspx

    And while you are on the NRA site, if you are not yet a member, please join. All gun owners must unite right now. And we need to support the NRA in this fight.
    This is what we are up against:

    http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/assault-weapons

    Thank you!

    Erik
     
  20. morcey2

    morcey2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2010
    Messages:
    2,060
    Location:
    Central Utah
    I signed it, but got a canned response thanking me for supporting "common sense gun laws." :scrutiny:

    "You keep using that petition. I do not think it means what you think it means." with apologies to Inigo Montoya.
     
  21. CTPhil

    CTPhil Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    281
    Location:
    NW Connecticut
    Signed.
     
  22. John828

    John828 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,084
    Location:
    Arkansas
  23. jon_in_wv

    jon_in_wv Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    3,816
    More importantly we really need to inform the public of what Feinstein is trying to do. People think she is only trying to ban "high capacity magazines" and "weapons of war". They don't realize the breadth and scope of what this AWB attempts to do. I have SIX weapons I would be required to register and tax under this law. This is a major gun grab that will effect millions. If this passes there is one party and many from the other I will vote against for LIFE.
     
  24. xman1337

    xman1337 Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    8
    This is my first post here, but I've been reading for some time.

    I created a petition that specifically targets Sen. Feinstein's bill. The NRA's website has a good summary of what the bill would cover.

    Basically, anything semi-auto or with a detachable magazine would require NFA like registration, a $200 per weapon tax, and forfeiture upon the owner's death. All sales and transfers, including transfers of current NFA items, would be illegal.

    If you like how I worded the petition, I urge you to sign it or create something better and promote it.

    https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/oppose-sen-feinsteins-plan-ban-most-firearms/LYcG0MLF
     
  25. goon

    goon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Messages:
    7,251
    xman1337 - I applaud your efforts at creating a petition specifically in opposition of Feinstein's upcoming proposed legislation.

    Having said that, I didn't sign your petition because I disagree with the wording. When you say that her proposal "goes too far," that is essentially the same thing as saying that if she backs off to only a few of her criteria, that will be good enough. But that won't be good enough.

    Any restrictions on guns, be it 1 gun or the 120 that she mentions in her outline, is too many. Any of her requirements for registration, fingerprinting, not being able to transfer our property as we see fit (in accordance with the law) are unnacceptable.

    The only gun related actions I'd support are those that would allow teachers to become trained and carry at work if they choose to (or allow other school staff, volunteers, or National Guardsmen/reservists to provide some measure of armed security), or those that are specifically targeted at keeping guns out of the hands of criminals or the mentally insane.


    Also, I suspect that regardless of what petition any of us create, we will end up with the same response that has been showing up expressing the virtues of expanded gun control. I have read somewhere that the Administration has said they received 400,000 signatures supporting expanded gun control, but I suspect that at least half of those signatures are from pro-gun petitions that are getting this cookie-cutter answer and just being added into the final tally.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page