Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Please tell me about the Sig 239

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Ghostrider_23, May 26, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ghostrider_23

    Ghostrider_23 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    413
    I want to get another carry auto in 9mm and I have narrowed it down to the Kahr P9 and the Sig 239. Both chambered in 9mm.

    Of those you have one or how have handle one, please tell me about the pro and con's of the 239. I know the 239 is about 6-7 ounces heavier than the Kahr, but I have heard a lot of negative things about the Kahr.

    I was so excited to see it and wanted to like it, but after holding it in my hand I hate the feel of it!!!!!

    So
     
  2. JustinL

    JustinL Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    277
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    My 239 is a pleasure to carry; I've had it 18 months and have no regrets. I don't know anything about the Kahr.
     
  3. AK103K

    AK103K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    5,773
    The P239 is a great gun. Its a little heavy for its size, especially since its a single stack. The P229 isnt much bigger and is a double stack. You may want to check one of them out at the same time.
     
  4. gbelleh

    gbelleh Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,747
    Location:
    Kansas
    The 239 is heavy, but carries pretty well with a proper belt and holster.

    Why not consider a Kahr K9?
     
  5. Cowboy2

    Cowboy2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    233
    I have a 239 in .40s&w, and it gets carried more than anything else. I'm not a big guy, and I've never found it burdensome to carry or conceal. I've had mine for 10 years, with thousand of rounds through it, and I honestly cannot remember the gun ever jamming. I can't say that about any other auto I've owned with comparable round counts.

    Long and short, its a Sig. Its reliable, its accurate. I like my Kahr PM9, and it sure is handy, but the 239 still gets carried three times as often.
     
  6. PhillyGlocker

    PhillyGlocker Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    235
    Why not get a G19 or G26? You can carry either comfortably.
     
  7. grimjaw

    grimjaw Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Messages:
    3,358
    Location:
    Arkansas
    I had the SA/DA 239 in 9mm. I haven't owned or shot a P9, but I did own a K9 and a PM9.

    The 239 was a nice gun, but it's not much smaller or lighter than the G19 I replaced it with. Plus, it didn't point as well for me as the Glock. I have no complaints about its performance or reliability, however, and I don't hesitate to recommend it.

    With the short, polymer grip/frame, the PM9 could be a handful (pun intended) to shoot. For such a small gun, the K9 was relatively tame. If you have the funds and don't mind the additional weight of the steel frame, I recommend the K9 over the P9. Any of Kahrs will obviously be easier to conceal vs the 239.

    If you haven't already fired a Kahr, I'd recommend trying one out so you can learn what to expect from the trigger pull. It's quite different from a SA/DA SIG, and still noticeably different than a SIG DAK.

    jm
     
  8. bluto

    bluto Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    355
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    I have both the G19 and the P239 in 9mm. The G19 is a great weapon and is my second favorite 9mm after the P239. You do need to replace the smallish stock grips on the P239 with Hogue fingergrooves (this is a popular opinion among 239 owners). It's the most accurate 9mm I own and is a bit softer to shoot than the G19 though both are comfortable.

    The only objections are weight and capacity. I don't carry so weight is not an issue. 239 mags are very compact so carrying extras is no biggie. At the range, the 239 is more fun to shoot and is just as "fast" handling as the G19.
     
  9. IMTHDUKE

    IMTHDUKE Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    1,022
    Location:
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Don't just carry....carry well.

    [​IMG]
     
  10. Rinspeed

    Rinspeed Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,298
    Location:
    NY
    I love my 239, small enough to conceal easily yet big enough to get a good handle on. If there is a more accurate reliable pistol in the 239s price range I've never heard of it.




    [​IMG]
     
  11. Safety First

    Safety First Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    742
    Location:
    Middle Georgia area
    The P239 was my first CCW. My daughter still has it, I loaned it to her couple years ago. I still have hopes of getting it back ...one day...Anyway, it is a great CCW, that is one of it's strongest features. It is light and thin,more accurate than I am and stone cold reliable. I have been carrying a 1911 since I loaned it to my daughter and now prefer the 1911 to anything. That said, the P239 will always remain one of my favorite handguns. Mine was in 9mm and it really likes Speer Gold Dots in 124 gr +P. That gun with that ammo is an excellent combination and I do not feel undergunned with it. I simply like the 1911 platform in .45ACP better for CCW and somewhat better stopping power.
     
  12. rcellis

    rcellis Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    418
    Location:
    North Central Kansas
    My 239 is a constant 'home wrecker'; if I didn't own it, I would (possibly) be able to settle on a long-term relationship with one of my other guns - but the 239 is such a great carry gun that it gets holster time right along. Then again, I'm showing signs of not being a one-gun-guy.

    Even so, the 239 is one solid dependable easy-to-carry pistol.
     
  13. Trebor

    Trebor Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,817
    Rinspeed,

    Is that an Alessi Talon in your pic?

    I've been thinking of getting a Talon for my 239. I have a Talon for my S&W Model 65 and was wondering if it would work as well for the Sig 239.

    How well does yours work? You pick it up from Lou direct?
     
  14. Rinspeed

    Rinspeed Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,298
    Location:
    NY
    Yes Trebor it is a Talon Plus and it works very well for me. I wasn't sure about the clip but it does a very good job. Lou is only an hour away so I always order direct and pick the holster up so I can hang out and bull****. He is a very nice guy to say the least.
     
  15. Mainsail

    Mainsail Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Messages:
    3,058
    Location:
    Washington
    If your goal is light weight and small profile, buy the Kahr. If you ever had to shoot either one, the Sig is the one that WILL work when you pull the trigger, is dead accurate, and is faster with follow-up shots.

    Carry the standard 8 round magazine in the gun and a ten-rounder for a backup.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  16. evan price

    evan price Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Messages:
    5,476
    Location:
    http://www.ohioccw.org/ Ohio's best CCW resour
    Owned my 9mm P239 since they came out what, twelve years ago? It's my daily carry, with 147gr Gold Dots. I trust my life to it. It has never jammed or misfed, it has thousands of rounds through it, it always goes bang, and it puts lead where I point it.
    A set of Hogue fingergroove wraparound grips and trijicon night sights are worth it. The mags are not cheap but I lucked out and found a few on eBay before they stopped mag sales, wound up with 4 spares for about $15 each, in onesies and twosies.
    It's a Sig. You either love them or hate them. It's what you shoot best.
     
  17. JDGray

    JDGray Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,130
    Location:
    SW MI.
    The grip hides well on the 239, better than my G23. Its a bit heavier, but more comfortable. The only gripe with the 239 is the slide catch is right where I grip the gun, and I don't get slide lock on the last shot. The Hogue finger groove grips are nice, but they stick to my shirt, and they force my middle finger under the trigger gaurd causing a blister. Great gun:)
     
  18. Spenser

    Spenser Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    62
    Location:
    Texas
    I love the 239. I don't carry it very often, because I find myself doing more pocket or ankle carry than anything else. But I agree that it's a great shooter, and the dimensions make it a great on the belt carry gun. As mentioned here before, the 232 gets carried more than anything these days.

    I do find the grip to be a bit short, making it somewhat topheavy. It's just too heavy to carry concealed in my preferred manner. As noted, I think it's a perfect belt carry gun, with a jacket.

    Would I trust it with my life? You bet. I'd have no hesitation in recommending it to someone.
     
  19. Old Dog

    Old Dog Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,489
    Location:
    somewhere on Puget Sound
    Terrific carry pistol; if it fits your hand well and points well for you, you'll love it (most women who've handled and shot the 239 appreciate this pistol, too, as it seems to fit a lot of female hands awfully well). I recommend any SIG over any Kahr without reservation.
     
  20. CAS700850

    CAS700850 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,304
    Location:
    Central Ohio
    A great gun. Only reason I let mine go was that I have a Glock 19, which is about the same size as the 239. plus, I got a great deal for the 239, but that's another story...
     
  21. SimpleIsGood229

    SimpleIsGood229 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Messages:
    934
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    First off, you should really hold and examine both pistols for yourself so you can actually see and feel what works better for you.

    That said, I personally prefer the P239. You can also alter the size of the SIG's grip with a set of Hogue rubbers. Not so with the polymer frame of the Kahr. You also have more (and better, IMHO) trigger options with the SIG.

    If you plan to shoot it a lot, the SIG also seems to be the better choice.
     
  22. Trebor

    Trebor Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,817
    Here's a testimonial:

    I'm carrying my 239 in a Galco Summer Comfort as a I write this.

    My normal carry gun is a S&W Model 65, but I've been considered switching to the Sig 239 after training it with for a week at the SigArms Academy, so I finally decided to give it a "test run" all this week.

    So far, two days in, it's working out pretty well for carry. I do have complete confidence in the gun, as I do the Smith, so it's going to come down to which one is more comfortable for every day carry.
     
  23. AK103K

    AK103K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    5,773
    If you dont like the rubber Houges (I hate them, and the finger grooves), they have some decent wood grips that offer a little more "swell" than the factory grips. I wish SIG would offer factory grips with more swell too, but I aint holding my breath.

    These are Houge checkered Coco bolo''s......

    [​IMG]

    Just to give you an idea as the the size difference between a P239 and a P229....

    [​IMG]

    P239 on top of the P229
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Those are both 357SIG's, the P239 carries 7, the P229 carries 12.
     
  24. Ghostrider_23

    Ghostrider_23 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    413
    WOW

    I 239 and the 229 are very close. Just a 1/2 inch here and a couple onces heavier I know then I am back up to a full size carry gun. Been down that road and never carried it.:banghead: I did look at the 228 in 9mm. but I think knowing me the LITTLE extra weight and size will keep me from carring it.
     
  25. Moonclip

    Moonclip Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,766
    Location:
    USA
    Wonderful,thin and accurate.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page