I wouldn't, for the same reason you guys whine about it, but what's the alternative? No accountablility? In my job, I'm hired by a client who doesn't know how to do my job functions. And yet, I'm accountable to them, regardless of how well they know (or don't know) my job. Sounds like what you are talking about.I dont know what you do for a living, but how would you like your performance critiqued by someone who has never done the job, received any of the training, or aquired any of your specialized knowledge?
All this smells of the arguement that citizens should have no say in public servant's jobs. Maybe I'm reading something into it.Being a cop requires skills and knowledge that non-cops by definition do not have or know. So how could a non-cop possibly form an objective, qualified evaluation about what cops do? Y'all simply dont have the tools. It is literally Monday morning quarterbacking, cause you were'nt on the field and didnt attend any practices. It is unfair to the profession, and no different than a non-doctor attempting to evaluate what a doctor has done. You can form an opinion, but of what quality can that opinion be, being based on what you dont know and have no experiences in? You are certainly entitled to your opinion, but how much weight should be placed on it?
I don't need to know everything about you or your job to be able to see the outcome. It also doesn't take any special ninja training to see when a cop has lost perspective on who he is and what his job is.
Personally, I think it may be perfectly valid to have someone who knows nothing of you and your job to judge you. It happens all the time. It's called the legal system. The judge and jury knows nothing, and both sides try to educate and persuade them, "from scratch." So what's good for the entire country isn't good for cops?