Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

POLL : Pick an optic

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by fragout, Jun 23, 2013.

?

Which scope?

Poll closed Sep 21, 2013.
  1. LEUPOLD 1-4X20MM HOG SCOPE

    35 vote(s)
    71.4%
  2. WEAVER 1-3X20MM SCOPE

    2 vote(s)
    4.1%
  3. OTHER OF SAME MAGNIFICATION AND PRICE

    12 vote(s)
    24.5%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. fragout

    fragout Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    654
    Location:
    TBD
    1. Leupold 1-4x20mm hog scope

    2. Weaver 1x3x20mm scope

    3. Other of similar magnification and price

    Opinions on the following optics wanted. Likes, and dislikes?

    Rings? ( Looking at the Burris signature Z rings) Opinions?

    Lookin to mount it on a rifle chambered for 308 Winchester.

    Target shooting, and hunting hog, coyote, and deer.
     
  2. TIMC

    TIMC Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,786
    Location:
    Texas
    Can't say, I'm a big Leupold scope fan but my serious hunting rifles all have way more magnification abilities than your choices.
     
  3. skoro

    skoro Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,058
    Location:
    Texas
    Pick an optic

    Heck, flip a coin. You can't lose between a Leupold and a Weaver - they're both darn fine optics.
     
  4. gotigers

    gotigers Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,424
    As posted above. Need more magnification for your uses.

    I have the weaver on a 15-22, it is a good scope. I also have other 1-4x scopes. They are fine for 3 gun or plinking, but i would not use them for precision/target or hunting. Especially with the range of a 308. If i had to choose between the two i would go with the leupold.

    What model rifle will this be mounted on?
    What is your budget?
     
  5. tahunua001

    tahunua001 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,224
    Location:
    Idaho
    in your price range I would go with something by vortex. clear picture, great warranty and rugged. cheaper option I have come to love is Nikon Prostaff. not quite as nice as the vortex but they are durable and precise.

    I had that leupold on an AR15 the thing was a piece of s...er... stuff. I traded it to my brother for 1000 rounds of 9mm ammo and he put it on an ruger M77/357 and took him nearly 150 rounds to get the damn thing sighted in... I would never recommend another leupold as long as I live. redfields are just as bad but at least they're cheaper.
     
  6. adelbridge

    adelbridge Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,107
    Location:
    Texas
    Leupold vx-r or trijicon Accupoint 3-9 or higher. The lighted reticle is perfect for black hogs after dark.
     
  7. jmr40

    jmr40 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,892
  8. fragout

    fragout Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    654
    Location:
    TBD
    I have heard that before in regards to certain reticles as "too busy", but am not quite certain exactly what that means.

    I would assume it to mean that the reticle distracts the shooters attention....as compared to a simple crosshair reticle?
     
  9. MErl

    MErl Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,283
    I was looking for a 1-4 recently and almost went with that exact leupold. I realized I would not be able to stand reading PIG PLEX every time I looked through it.
     
  10. Charles S

    Charles S Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,026
    Location:
    North East Texas
    I find it ironic that for years prior to optics people did fine with open sights and routinely made shots approaching the ranges the average hunter with a modern rifle, and I chose that specific word "hunter" - not "shooter", but now we need
    . I see people "hunting" of benches with 6.5 X 20 scopes!

    I assert we need more hunters not more magnification.

    I routinely use a fixed 2.5 power Burris for all of your applications and I do not miss! I can count the number of large game animals, not squirrels, I have missed on three fingers in all of my years of hunting.

    I think the Leupold is a fine optic... If low light is a consideration, and money is no object, as mentioned consider the Trijicon scope.

    My current favorite rifle is a very light 308 with a Leupold 2.5 X 8 VX III.

    Good luck and have fun.

    No offense intended.... Each of us approach a problem from a different angle.
     
  11. JPG19

    JPG19 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    292
    Location:
    Northwest Arkansas
    In my opinion, this is largely because more emphasis used to be placed on marksmanship. With such high quality scopes available at such reasonable prices, people can "afford" to spend less time mastering the basics and make everything easier by placing a quality optic on their rifle. It's not so much that we CAN'T hit targets at good range with iron sights, it's that we don't NEED to.
     
  12. fragout

    fragout Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    654
    Location:
    TBD
    I love iron sights personally, but am also interested in optics. Both have thier place in hunting as well as target shooting imo.

    Cant stand the "pig"......... "plex"........ inside the reticle either lol.

    I am sticking with a 1 inch tube for this project, and optics at around the same price, weight, and OAL.

    This is not a precision "hit a dime at 1000m" type of quest, and am looking more towards close range and inside the treeline in low light.

    Same optic/rifle for bashing water filled milk jugs out to 500m or so............I'll call it "informal" target shooting.
     
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2013
  13. splattergun

    splattergun Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2012
    Messages:
    1,637
    Location:
    Utah
    Any of those choices. I'm assuming you're an Eastern hunter where ya can't see the forest for the trees and used to shorter ranges, since you're looking for lower magnification glass. 3X should do just fine. I rarely use over 3X until I'm looking at >300 yards.
     
  14. TexAg

    TexAg Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    781
    That's plenty of magnification IMO. You learn to use what you have.
     
  15. gotigers

    gotigers Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,424
    The more magnification statement was all encompassing for precision and hunting. I agree you don't need scopes for all hunting. I am a hunter and a shooter.

    I don't like busy reticles. I like classic crosshairs for hunting and 3 gun. I like the mil/mil marks for high power scopes when target shooting.

    for what you want 1-4x will probably be fine. Just don't expect to shoot 1/2" groups at 200 yards. I shoot a lot of 200-400 with 1-4x. It is fine for 3 gun and plinking steel, but not good enough for target match.
     
  16. Beentown

    Beentown Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2011
    Messages:
    468
    Yep...
     
  17. Skyshot

    Skyshot Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    936
    Location:
    Tn.
    I have two of the pig plex scopes, one a 581 series mini-14 and the other on a Stag AR. Best scope I've ever had for running coyotes. That center plex circle is a perfect for leading a running dog.
     
  18. slowr1der

    slowr1der Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    939
    I don't think you can go wrong with either, however, it's no way I'd put a scope that small on a .308 with that intended use. I'd go with at least a 3-9 if not a 4-14.

    As for the rings, the Burris Signature Zee rings are an excellent choice. They are by far my favorite rings I've used under $100.
     
  19. DM~

    DM~ Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,170
    Location:
    upper mid west
    1x4's have a WIDE field of view....perfect for most hunting and getting a high X scope won't make you a better hunter or game shot at the ranges you SHOULD be shooting at big game!

    DM
     
  20. MTMilitiaman

    MTMilitiaman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,458
    Location:
    Missoula, Montana
    I am with those who say that either of those optics should provide ample magnification for 99% of most hunting chores.

    Consider that the average sniper scope a generation or two ago only went to 4x at most and often was closer to half that. Consider most game is taken at under 200 yards and much of it at less than half that--often on running quarry.

    I have a 4.5-14 Leupold on a 7mm Rem Mag. Can't ever say I've wanted more magnification. I can say there have been a few times I've wanted less. I typically keep it on its lowest magnification setting, but even that can be overwhelming when you find yourself 30 feet or so from your target.

    I've had a Weaver go Tango Uniform on a Ruger 10/22 so I don't really trust the Weavers to go the distance with any sort of abuse. Never had a problem with Leupold though and that would be my recommendation.
     
  21. swampcrawler

    swampcrawler Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2013
    Messages:
    487
    I'm going to go with the pro low mag crowd. If you sent shooting prattie dogs at 300+ yards, high magnification will do more harm than help IMHO

    Il take field of view over seeing flees any day.
     
  22. steveo452

    steveo452 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    132
    Location:
    Deep in Dixie
    I'm not sure which crowd I'm in, the low mag or the high mag. Maybe someone can tell me. I've got a Leupold VX3 2.5 - 8 x 36mm on my CZ 527 carbine in 7.62x39. Where I live 150 yards is a long shot, most are killed in the 75-100 yard range. Either scope would work well for what you want to do, except they may be a bit low powered for target shooting. Me, I'd go with the Leupold.
     
  23. DM~

    DM~ Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,170
    Location:
    upper mid west
    All i can say is, you can shoot some pretty good groups with a 4X scope,

    [​IMG]

    What more do you need for a HUNTING scope at any decent ranges?

    DM
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page