Spun out of the Remington Bankruptcy thead so as to not get that thread to far off topic.
The RM-380, as
@chicharrones found out recently, uses a small slug of elastomer as the spring for the extractor. This started a discussion of elastomers and their use in firearms and rather than go off topic there I wanted to start this thread.
I personally don't have an issue with elastomer springs but many see this as a way gun companies are going cheap. I would certainly concede that price is a driver in this but elastomers also offers function, in the form of damping that a spring alone cannot do.
Not only did the RM380 have a pure elstomer spring for its extractor so did the DPMS Gen II. I have shot both a fair amount and never had an issue with them. Not to mention the elstomers in just about every AR-15 buffer weight that we never think about.
They certainly do not have the shelf life of a metal spring but they always performed well or better than a spring for me in places were it was designed for properly.
As for exposure to gun cleaners and lubricant I have never had an issue with that exposure and good modern elastomers/polymers. There are lots of gun using polymers for many things now and its been a non-issue on their exposures to nearly all gun related chemicals. Polymer frames, magazine followers, grips, handguards, stocks, etc.
Polymers specifically elastomers are everywhere now, my guns, my bikes, my vehicles, everywhere.
So is it space age technology? Just being cheap? or some combination of both when used in guns?