Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Possible Solution

Discussion in 'Legal' started by jselvy, Jun 19, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jselvy

    jselvy member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    518
    Ladies and Gentlemen of the Forum,

    Here is a possible solution.

    Felons have been proven, by government funded, peer-reviewed study, to be at the heart of the rising crime rates. According to these studies the recidivism rates are as high as 60%. They obviously cannot be trusted with the full rights and responsibilities of law abiding citizens. I consider it a little unfair that they be denied for life though.
    Maybe it would be possible to gather them in an area apart from their victims. Allow them to work hard and at the end of a course of treatment be allowed to return to society as full members. If at first they fail they would continue to be allowed to try and work towards their eventual release. The fact that they are physically separated from the law abiding citizenry would prevent any further predations by them. These areas would have to be guarded of course but it would probably cost less than accumulated costs of recurring offenders.
    What is your opinion? Could this work?

    Jefferson
     
  2. TallPine

    TallPine Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    7,734
    Location:
    somewhere in the middle of Montana
    Don't they call those "prisons" ...???
     
  3. silliman89

    silliman89 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Messages:
    283
    Location:
    Virginia
    Exactly.

    I really don't know what you're getting at.
     
  4. jselvy

    jselvy member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    518
    No, prisons are just holding facilities. I meant a place where actual work must be accomplished. No sentencing, just work until the have fulfilled the obligations set down by law.

    Jefferson
     
  5. pcosmar

    pcosmar member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    954
    Location:
    UP Michigan
    I don't understand your position.
    Are people born felons? Where do they come from?
    How do you account for first offense crimes?
    If only felons are the problem I would think creating less felons would help.
    If 60% commit crimes again, that means 40% do not.
    If there were less laws there would be less crime.
    If less crimes were classed as felonies there would be less felons, and less prison space needed. That would mean that the truly violent and dangerous could be contained longer.
     
  6. scbair

    scbair Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2003
    Messages:
    610
    Location:
    South Carolina
    They did this; called it "Australia." Worked well, till the inmates took over . . .
     
  7. jselvy

    jselvy member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    518
    There have been well-respected studies that indicate that there may be, in fact, a genetic disposition to crime. It can also be said through similar studies that criminal behavior starts in childhood.

    Jefferson
     
  8. armoredman

    armoredman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    16,213
    Location:
    proud to be in AZ
    jselvy, what you propose is one of three things - Utopia, prison, or Escape from New York. Utopia is impossible, no number of people, especially those who have shown a predisposition for law breaking, can live "in harmony". Escape from New York is a fun idea, until you lose the President inside. :) Sorry, the whiners wouldn't let it happen anyway.
    What you are talking about is rehabilitation. My Dept uses a number of approaches, one called "Paralell Universe", where the inmate has some of the same responsabilities as on the outside, (Going to a job, get up on time, go to chow on time), to better increase thier ability to function on the outside. Numerous studies, programs, efforts have been launched, and massive amounts of data gathered, all to find the same conclusion - unless the individual is willing to change, his behavior will never change.
    Sometimes it works, sometimes not. I do NOT buy that individuals are genetically predisposed towards criminal behavior. THAT is the same "society made me do it" cop out I hear every day. Individuals may be "bent" towards crime by a violent or loveless childhood, but our society holds the individual responsable for thier own actions.
    In the meantime, I realize that 96% of all inmates will get out eventaully, and while I cheer on the success stories, I keep my CZ PO1 close for those who keep me in business.
     
  9. pcosmar

    pcosmar member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    954
    Location:
    UP Michigan
    jselvy said,
    I have heard that too, but I don't buy it.
    I had a good upbringing, both parents, no abuse. Out of 6 kids, I was the only one that got into trouble. One brother worked in LE.
    I was told many times that I "didn't fit the profile" what ever that means.
    I also knew people in prison for self defense. One shot his wifes rapist.
    I knew a man that bought a car from a car dealer, it later turned out to have been stolen.(recieving stolen property) He had it 2 years, bought plates twice, and had a clear title.
    I have a lot of real life stories, not a "study".
     
  10. jselvy

    jselvy member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    518
    But we already deny them most of their civil rights, why not just restrict their freedom of movement until they have proven themselves worthy of citizenship again?
    I don't mean this in place of prisons but after they have served their time. A sort of societal rehabilitation program.

    Jefferson
     
  11. TX1911fan

    TX1911fan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,013
    Where would it be? What type of work would they do? How would you keep them from being "felons" to each other? I don't think it would work. I think we need fewer laws and longer sentences for the laws we keep.
     
  12. NeoSpud

    NeoSpud Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2007
    Messages:
    388
    There is strong evidence for a predisposition (a diathesis, actually) for depression. Diathesis or not, unless the eliciting events (in depression's case, usually a stressful situation within which the person is unable to cope) occur along with the predisposition, depression won't occur.

    Crime, on the other hand, is a socially-prohibited behavior. Perhaps people can have a predisposition towards anger, and perhaps they can be raised in an environment in which they are not taught proper coping strategies (poor upbringing), and THAT leads to their criminal lifestyle. But genetics causing crime? No way...

    Depressed people also tend to commit suicide at a higher rate than non-depressed people. Does that mean that the genetic predisposition towards depression is actually a predisposition towards suicide? Nope.

    I'm not aware of any transitive property of genetics/behavior ;)
     
  13. jselvy

    jselvy member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    518
    Anyplace with wide open spaces, like central Wyoming, West Texas, Central Nevada, Eastern Montana, Anywhere in North Dakota, Central Alaska for example
    I don't know, but I'm sure that our elected representatives could think of something.
    You couldn't but at least there would be no Innocent victims.
    I mean we have already established that they cannot be allowed their rights as citizens, thus they are no longer part of "The People" so why not?


    Jefferson
     
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2007
  14. ConstitutionCowboy

    ConstitutionCowboy member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2006
    Messages:
    3,230
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    It starts in the first five or six years of life. It's the time in human development when we should be developing a conscience - because after that, the chance for that is gone. The "hard wiring" is complete. The only incentive to behave properly after that is the fear of going to prison. With a conscience, you most likely wouldn't take what doesn't belong to you - including someone else's life except in defense - but without that conscience, other things can control your behavior such as revenge, desire, greed, lust, etc. If such a conscienceless individual(sociopath) thinks (s)he can "get away with it", they will. They rarely consider the consequences of their actions anyway. Thinking that far ahead is antithetical to their desire(need?) for instant gratification.

    A whole new thought process needs to be introduced to these people, and I'd imagine some will "adopt" it and allow that "education" to control their unabateable desire(s). The want and feelings of need never go away, they can never "grow" a conscience, but can learn to behave. That's probably the 40% who don't end up back in jail. Some "learn" this before caving to the conscienceless behavior, so it can and does happen that fear of the consequences can thwart undesirable behavior.

    Keeping the rest in custody is the best answer; be it prison, institutionalization, guardianship, or execution for the most heinous and those who will not be controlled. They can earn their keep. When proven they can behave properly, they can be returned to society.

    I think the OP is on target.

    Woody
     
  15. dfaugh

    dfaugh Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,994
    Ever see the movie "Escape From NY"?
     
  16. pdowg881

    pdowg881 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    1,103
    Location:
    Southern NH
    Don't they go to halfway houses?
     
  17. TallPine

    TallPine Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    7,734
    Location:
    somewhere in the middle of Montana
    Well, if you are restricting their freedom of movement, then they are in some sense of the word "imprisoned"

    If what you are suggesting is more attempts at "rehabilitation" then okay, but they are still "prisoners" of the govt. correction system. A lot of states have a "trustee" program where inmates work outside with no restriction on their freedom other than the honor system. In Montana, a couple guys just last week violated their honor and drove off in a prison owned pickup. It took a few days to catch them, and now they are going to be spending a long time in hard lockup.

    Probation is supposed to work much the same way - "supervised release"

    A better idea is just not to put people in jail for victimless crimes in the first place, and concentrate on keeping the really dangerous ones locked up.

    Oh, and please don't send your felons to Montana ... :(
     
  18. trueg50

    trueg50 Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2007
    Messages:
    265
    Location:
    Vermont
    pdowg881: Don't they go to halfway houses?

    Half way houses are for mentally incompetint individuals who are "with it" enough to not need to be in a hospital but are not capable of living alone in the real world.

    Well how about this, ship all sex offenders (except those convicted of statchitory rape) and serial killers to an island, any uninhabited one will do. the Navy can use the surrounding area for menuevers, as guards of sorts. Maybe drop in some food every once in a while, otherwise, let the lord of the flies part deux begin!

    There was a movie with Ray Leota in it that was similar to this, but same general idea.
     
  19. anygunanywhere

    anygunanywhere Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    163
    Location:
    League City, TX
    Prisons

    Texas prisons used to be self sufficient. Inmates had to work. They used to grow their own food including livestock for meat. Texas prisons were a model.

    Then came a Judge named William Wayne Justice and a lawsuit.

    Now the prisoners can not be forced to work. They have better health care than most working stiffs.

    They have air conditiioning and cable TV. Dental. Unlimited access to legal aid.

    Yes, there is abetter way, but the stinking bleeding heart liberals and their ACLU lawyers and judges and legislators have ruined it.

    So, what is your point about working felons?
     
  20. pcosmar

    pcosmar member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    954
    Location:
    UP Michigan
    trueg50 said.
    Not true, Halfway houses are used to reintegrate into society.
    On my way out I was in a work release program in Kansas City. It is a converted hotel on Oak st. We could leave for work, church, or other events but had to come back at set times. We were allowed some freedom but were supervised and had a strict set of rules.
    From there I went to a halfway house in Columbia Mo,and was eventualy released on parole. I completed my parole, but was supervised the whole time with visits at my home and work and reporting monthly.
    They don't just open the door and set you out.
     
  21. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,083
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Hey, this the hypothetical penal colony that we proposed years ago in my law enforcement days--"MOPEBERIA"!:D A place to send the mopes. Yeah, somewhere out there in the Western Waste is what we thought too, but we did not want to bring them back.:neener:

    Anywho, states have tried this approach under many different guises. In order for your approach to work, you need to impose the sentence at birth.*

    *The criminal justice system cannot trump the way these people are raised. They are broken and no amount of government can fix them.
     
  22. jselvy

    jselvy member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    518
    I will admit I was playing Devil's Advocate.
    The Idea of "Work will make you free" has been tried before, in German it is Arbeit Macht Frei which was inscribed over the gates of Buchenwald.

    Substitute Final for Possible and Jew for Felon to reveal the secret message.

    Jefferson
     
  23. pcosmar

    pcosmar member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    954
    Location:
    UP Michigan
    I prefer to work for the little I have, than to live a life of ease in a cage.
     
  24. Titan6

    Titan6 member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,745
    Location:
    Gillikin Country
    I think it is called DC.

    They just keep stealing more money and spending it on things I would never think to buy on my own and sending it to other countries with even more criminals.

    On the other hand we are kind of at the end of the road here so far as "free" land and where to put people who don't want to follow the rules of civil behavior. Many parts of the 13 Colonies once had penal colonies where Europe was dumping it's problem children.

    I say your chances of getting these idiot drug laws repealed are better than funding any kind of federal penal colony. Repeal the drug laws and you remove a lot of incentive for crime and Darwin will take care of most of the drug addicts. But since there is an element that wants to make tobacco illegal the chance of getting the more deadly drugs leagalized is unlikely.
     
  25. TallPine

    TallPine Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    7,734
    Location:
    somewhere in the middle of Montana
    I would suggest sending felons to the moon but they might rebel and start throwing rocks at us ;)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page