Dionysusigma
Member
While at a new gun store (to me, anyhow) the other day, I was ogling the CETMEs and MBRs and so forth, until I found something I've wanted to see for a long time--a Bushmaster M17s Bullpup. After a salesman noticed my interest and handed it to me, I then asked if they had any hi-cap preban AR-15 mags so that I could see how it looks with one in the well.
His response?
"You can't do that--it's against the law."
According to his beliefs, putting a pre-ban mag in a post-ban rifle isn't kosher, but this doesn't sit right with me. I've got an SAR-1, with which I use 40rders with all the time. The date of manufacture, plainly etched upon the side, is 2003. Nobody has ever said anything against it, and plenty of people have seen it so. It was shipped with the mag, plus a 10rder, and after the purchase I didn't have any mysterious black vans follow me home.
So I'm wondering, What's the deal? Is this guy wrong, or what? His logic goes against everything else I've seen or heard...
His response?
"You can't do that--it's against the law."
According to his beliefs, putting a pre-ban mag in a post-ban rifle isn't kosher, but this doesn't sit right with me. I've got an SAR-1, with which I use 40rders with all the time. The date of manufacture, plainly etched upon the side, is 2003. Nobody has ever said anything against it, and plenty of people have seen it so. It was shipped with the mag, plus a 10rder, and after the purchase I didn't have any mysterious black vans follow me home.
So I'm wondering, What's the deal? Is this guy wrong, or what? His logic goes against everything else I've seen or heard...