Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Pre-ban mags in post-ban gun?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Dionysusigma, Oct 10, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Dionysusigma

    Dionysusigma Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    3,671
    Location:
    Okay City
    While at a new gun store (to me, anyhow) the other day, I was ogling the CETMEs and MBRs and so forth, until I found something I've wanted to see for a long time--a Bushmaster M17s Bullpup. After a salesman noticed my interest and handed it to me, I then asked if they had any hi-cap preban AR-15 mags so that I could see how it looks with one in the well.

    His response?
    "You can't do that--it's against the law."

    According to his beliefs, putting a pre-ban mag in a post-ban rifle isn't kosher, but this doesn't sit right with me. I've got an SAR-1, with which I use 40rders with all the time. The date of manufacture, plainly etched upon the side, is 2003. Nobody has ever said anything against it, and plenty of people have seen it so. It was shipped with the mag, plus a 10rder, and after the purchase I didn't have any mysterious black vans follow me home. :uhoh:

    So I'm wondering, What's the deal? Is this guy wrong, or what? His logic goes against everything else I've seen or heard... :mad:
     
  2. PAshooter

    PAshooter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    614
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, U.S.A.!!!
    The guy's just plain wrong.

    There can be an issue with some imported semi-autos (such as your SAR-1) with number of foreign-made vs. number of U.S. made parts if you use foreign-made pre-ban full-cap mags (and most AK full-caps fall into this category). Century imported SARs, to be specific, have enough U.S. made parts to permit the legal use of imported mags.

    As for U.S. made rifles (like your Bushmaster) - if it's legal for you to own the mag it's legal for you to use it in any firearm (pre or post ban) it fits.

    I am not a lawyer, nor do I pretend to be one. But I can read. And I'm pretty certain of the accuracy of the above "opinion." YMMV.
     
  3. Tamara

    Tamara Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    9,325
    Location:
    Hoosieropolis
    *sigh*

    This is one of those guys who gives gun store clerks a bad name.

    Yes, he's just plain wrong.
     
  4. gun-fucious

    gun-fucious Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,977
    Location:
    centre of the PA
    you can't be buying a post september 1994 manufactured "high capacity" magazine

    but access to the preban ones is fine, dependant on any State restrictions
     
  5. keederdag

    keederdag Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    613
    Location:
    Arizona
    What a dink; theyre still importing high-cap mags that were manufactured pre-1994:cuss:
     
  6. RustyHammer

    RustyHammer Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,335
    Location:
    Louisiana
    :banghead:
     
  7. Rebel Gunman HK

    Rebel Gunman HK member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    258
    Location:
    Las Cruces, NM
    Just say thanks dummy and walk out.
     
  8. Chipperman

    Chipperman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,572
    Location:
    Essex Co, MA
    Go back to the store. Tell him that he should give a discount on the rifle becuase you can't use hi-caps in it. :evil:
     
  9. Hkmp5sd

    Hkmp5sd Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,513
    Location:
    Winter Haven, FL
    Print him a copy of this...

    http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/user/wbardwel/public/nfalist/atf_letter26.txt
     
  10. PAshooter

    PAshooter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    614
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, U.S.A.!!!
    Is it just me, or is this letter intentionally unclear?

    1) You can use a hi-cap in any rifle, provided it (the magazine) "was lawfully possessed prior to September 14, 1994."

    2) "It is unlawful for an individual to possess or transfer a large capacity magazine which was manufactured after September 13, 1994. "

    OK - what about a magazine that was manufactured prior to September 13, 1994 that you only acquired recently? We all know those are perfectly legal to acquire / use (depending on individual state laws) - but this letter doesn't address that situation... does it?
     
  11. Dionysusigma

    Dionysusigma Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    3,671
    Location:
    Okay City
    MDShooter--

    Can anything be posessed before it's manufactured?;)
     
  12. GSB

    GSB Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    800
    It's not you. It's a poorly written letter that doesn't cover the most important question: pre-bans bought post-ban.
     
  13. PAshooter

    PAshooter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    614
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, U.S.A.!!!
    dionysusigma:

    I think you missed the point I was trying to make. What about a mag that was manufactured before 9/13/94 (making it a "pre-ban") but that you didn't possess until after (perhaps well after) that date? A situation many of us are in which does not seem to be addressed by this letter.

    Or perhaps I'm splitting semantic hairs ;)
     
  14. PAshooter

    PAshooter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    614
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, U.S.A.!!!
    Thanks GSB. You expressed my point much more clearly than I did :)
     
  15. AJ Dual

    AJ Dual member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,095
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Note that the ATF letter merely says "Lawfully posessed prior...", NOT "Lawfully posessed by YOU prior...".

    That means pre-94 mags would be legally posessed by whoever, the manufacturer, the distributor, the retailer, then you. You were all in legal posession throughout the magazine's existance.

    As long as the pre-94 mag functions in the original firearm it was designed for, it is legal to use in any other type of firearm, pre or post that accepts it, at least from a Federal law/ATF standpoint.

    A post-94 .gov/LEO only magazine would be "lawully posessed" by the manufacturer, the distributor, the retailer, then .mil or LEO. But the minute you joe-citizen posesses it, it's illegal.

    Barring som major unforseen backstabbing in the House of Reps, we'll be able to put all this silliness behind us, for awhile at least, when the ban expires in Sept. 14 '04.
     
  16. Smoke

    Smoke Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    3,245
    Location:
    Bosque County, Texas
    A common interpretation.

    I beleive it to be wrong. Until someone can show me that it is illegal I will continue to use all my hi-caps that I bought after the '94 ban.
     
  17. GSB

    GSB Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    800
    Oh boy, if we have to parse everything that fine, those of us not lawyers are in trouble. That's probably exactly what it means though.
     
  18. Hkmp5sd

    Hkmp5sd Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,513
    Location:
    Winter Haven, FL
    Perhaps the questions posed to ATF will help clarify ATF's response...

     
  19. harpethriver

    harpethriver Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    364
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Of course he's wrong-my new Para P-14 came w/14 rd. pre-ban mags. If it was even remotely illegal Para wouldn't have shipped them, the gun shop wouldn't have sold them and I wouldn't have been able to even buy them. If you're still not sure why don't you contact the ATF-they'll give you an honest, objective opinion, after all they're the government and they're here to help!!
     
  20. C.R.Sam

    C.R.Sam Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,632
    Location:
    Chino Valley, AZ., USA
    Since it is subject to interpretation;

    I would NOT show that ATF letter to inquisitive law enforcement as backing for possession of a pre-ban made, post ban acquired mag.

    Sam
     
  21. jrhead75

    jrhead75 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    Messages:
    298
    Location:
    Everett, WA
    A SAR-1 comes NIB with one 10 rd mag and one 40 rd mag. Considering all the trouble Century goes through to replace the proper number of parts, I kind of doubt they'd then throw in an illegal magazine...

    State law's one thing, but the feds are only after that brand new post '94 LE only hi-cap some civilian's got in his/her Beretta.
     
  22. Aikibiker

    Aikibiker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    513
    Location:
    Daytona, Fl
    The ATF said
    Oh man is this ever tempting.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page