Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Question on new federal law

Discussion in 'Legal' started by duck_god827, Aug 7, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. duck_god827

    duck_god827 Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    25
    Location:
    IOWA
    This may seem like a dumb question, but here goes. The new law passed stated that LEOs were able to carry concealed wepons while off duty. With out having a CCW. If they were able to prove that they were actual LEOs. I have heard that this may apply to active military and also reservist personal in the military. Can anyone clear up this for me. I still plan on checking with the local sheriff's office to be sure. I am not doing anything wrong.



    Thanks
    duck_god827
     
  2. Hkmp5sd

    Hkmp5sd Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,513
    Location:
    Winter Haven, FL
    It does not include active duty and reserve military personnel. Those can only carry firearms when issued by their command for official use.
     
  3. beerslurpy

    beerslurpy member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,438
    Location:
    Spring Hill, Florida
    So if I can convince the local sheriff to make me a deputy, that means I can carry on the streets of New York? Awesome. I didnt think the law would actually pass.
     
  4. Hawkmoon

    Hawkmoon Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,454
    Location:
    Terra
    Better read the law, Slurp. It's not quite that easy.

    Don't recall the specifics, but you have to be a sworn officer who is authorized to carry in the line of duty (for example, as I understand it, dispatchers or LEOs whose job descriptions don't require/allow firearms are not covered), and I believe you have to pass the departmental qualification however frequently the department requires requalification, ... and I think there may be a couple of other hoops to jump through as well.
     
  5. Sam

    Sam Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,384
    Location:
    Alamogordo, New Mexico
    Also have to have served for 15 or more years and be drawing a pension.

    Sam
     
  6. beerslurpy

    beerslurpy member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,438
    Location:
    Spring Hill, Florida
    This is Florida, the land of bribertunity. I'm sure I can make it happen. :D Partly joking.

    But it would be nice if I could carry in NYC when I visit my parents.
     
  7. Car Knocker

    Car Knocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,809
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    I believe that I've read that NYC will not allow out of state LEO's to carry unless they are on duty while in NYC and not just visiting.
     
  8. DMF

    DMF Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,247
    Location:
    Nomad
    It most definitely does NOT cover military personnel, even MPs, Security Forces, and Masters of Arms.
     
  9. gc70

    gc70 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,995
    Location:
    North Carolina
    It looks like this federal preemption puts the states are in a pretty tight box.
     
  10. Flyboy

    Flyboy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,888
    Location:
    Oklahoma City, OK
    I have two words for NYC:

    Federal. Preemption.

    That's right, Mr. Bloomberg, just like FOPA's peaceable journey provisions, you can't do anything about it. Oh, you can try, but the federal law will be a nice club with which to spank you in court.
     
  11. Hawkmoon

    Hawkmoon Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,454
    Location:
    Terra
    That's for retired. The law also covers LEOs who are currently working as LEOs, and you don't have to have 15 years of service before you are covered.

    And it certainly appears that NY cannot refuse to recognize the law. I believe what NY is doing is refusing to authorize their own officers to take advantage of the law, by not issuing them the requisite identification or some mumbo-jumbo like that. Probably a blatant violation of the law (certainly a violation of the intent of the law) but I don't believe they have been called on it as yet.
     
  12. Car Knocker

    Car Knocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,809
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Might want to read this thread about FOPA and NYC:
    http://www.thehighroad.org/showpost.php?p=1150693&postcount=1
     
  13. WT

    WT Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    1,985
  14. DMF

    DMF Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,247
    Location:
    Nomad
    gc70, you neglected to quote a relevant portion of the law which may allow the agency to restrict what it's LEOs can do under this law:

    http://www.leaa.org/218/218text.html
    Well it hasn't been tested in the courts, but I'd be willing to bet many would interpret that to mean if your agency says you can't carry at certain times, then at those times you are NOT protected by this law. Do you want to be the test case?

    I used to work for an agency that would not authorize carry while on vacation. 24/7 nationwide as long as you weren't on vacation, but take a half day to go to the doctor's office, and you weren't allowed to carry until you reported back to work. Now some folks in that agency have the attitude that this law supersedes that, however the lawyers disagree. Again, I feel sorry for the one that ends up being the test case.

    Also, it's interesting to note what the AG said about this policy within his department, DOJ:
    www.usdoj.gov/olp/agmemo01312005.pdf
     
  15. Hypnogator

    Hypnogator Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    1,801
    Location:
    AZ, WA
    Source?

    You are probably right in regard to most MPs, SPs, etc., but Army CID Special Agents, Air Force OSI Special Agents and Naval Criminal Investigative Service Special Agents are all federal law enforcement officers. I'm retired CID and just recently qualified with my home county under the provision of a retired officer qualifying under state LEO standards.

    FWIW, I doubt NYC can charge retired or off-duty LEOs with CCW, inasmuch as the federal law clearly specifies that such officers, once qualified, are exempt from state and local laws prohibiting carrying of concealed weapons.
     
  16. gc70

    gc70 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,995
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Absolutely correct, DMF. I was focusing on the federal preemption aspects of the law rather than on the federal restrictions aspect.

    Even with the general federal preemption, Section 926B(b)(2) gives states a lot of wiggle room. For instance, I could see how Section 926B(b)(2) could be interpreted to allow NY/NYC to bar CCW at the airports (government property or facilities) in the NYC area.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page