Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Question on ownership BP Inline

Discussion in 'Legal' started by lonewolf5347, Jul 5, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. lonewolf5347

    lonewolf5347 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    380
    I have a question seem some time back a good buddy got arrested on a felony theft and did serve some time a while back.I know he did a 360 turn around and has not been in any trouble for the last 4 years:seem he learned his lesson.I wonder if he can hunt and own a inline black powder rifle(legal)??
     
  2. deadin

    deadin Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    2,125
    Location:
    Ocean Shores, WA
    BP Inlines are considered as modern weapons. So if he can't possess a M94 Winchester, he can't possess an Inline.
     
  3. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    That would depend on the state.

    Some states define a "firearm" as anything that shoots a bullet using an explosive charge. Others define it as something that uses fixed cartridge ammunition.

    I'm not sure which states define a "modern muzzleloader" as a modern firearm, though. I'm not sure if there are any that make that distinction.

    Fish and Game laws are a different matter - but they govern whether you can use a particular gun in a SPECIAL SEASON for muzzleloaders.

    In-lines aren't eligible for special muzzleloader seasons in Idaho, nor, AFAIK, in Oregon or Washington, and probably a growing number of other places. That has nothing to do with whether felons can use them during regular rifle season, though.

    Contact your state attorney general's office, or whoever handles firearms law, or parole, or whatever is relevant to your friend.
     
  4. deadin

    deadin Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    2,125
    Location:
    Ocean Shores, WA
    That's probably because it is Federal Statutes that make the determination.
    They do not meet the definition of "Antique or Replica Thereof", so they have to be considered "Modern".
     
  5. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    IANAL, but I can order an in-line through the mail like a DVD. Federal law does not define the things as modern firearms.

    Do you know of a specific Federal statute that pertains only to felons? I don't know of one, but maybe you do.

    If you're talking about Federal law regulating firearms in general, muzzleloaders, including in-lines, are not considered "firearms" at all.

    Some states prohibit felons from shooting muzzleloaders, but AFAIK there's no special exemption for sidelocks.

    See this, also:
    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_laws_pretaining_to_antique_firearms_and_felons

    You need to find out what the laws are in your state.
     
  6. Flyboy

    Flyboy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,888
    Location:
    Oklahoma City, OK
    Your friend is trying to operate along the edges of the law. That's not a bad thing--if something is legal, that should be the end of it, and we should support him exercising his rights.

    Nonetheless, there is a certain amount of risk in doing so. He should not take legal advice from an internet forum. Consult an attorney of competent jurisdiction with experience in firearms law. If you post his location, I'm sure somebody can pass along a referral.

    Playing on the edge has to be done with care. Have him consult an expert so that he doesn't miss some minute detail that's the difference between "perfectly legal" and "felon in possession." Lawyers aren't cheap, but they beat the hell out of prison time.
     
  7. riverrat373

    riverrat373 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59
    Location:
    Pacific Northwest
    He might also petition the courts to get his 2nd amendment rights restored. There are lots of attorneys who specialize in that.
     
  8. NukemJim

    NukemJim Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,201
    Obligatory IANAL

    My understanding is that the section of BATFE that can restore your 2A rights is not available due to lack of funding by congress. SCOTUS has ruled this legal.

    Therefore the only way to get 2A rights back is to get a pardon or in some other fashion remove the felony conviction from the record.

    I believe that some states have different mechanisms for allowing exfelons to regain rights but since GCA68 covers the whole country it is the federal .gov that is the problem.

    As always I could be wrong.

    NukemJim
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page