Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ranger vs. Gold Dots in .40

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Blarelli, Dec 6, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Blarelli

    Blarelli Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    469
    Location:
    Az
    I know both of these loads are good, but which one do you personally think performs better.
     
  2. XD-40 Shooter

    XD-40 Shooter Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Messages:
    914
    I went with the 165 grain Gold Dot's, these are what the vast majority of the LEO's use, if it works for them, it works for me.:D
     
  3. rj112275

    rj112275 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    158
    Location:
    Tennessee
    I would not want to be shot with either. :neener:
     
  4. BrokenArrow

    BrokenArrow Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    199
    Location:
    Lost In Space
    Depends on how you define "performs better".

    The FBI has a pretty detailed way of evaluating ammo. They shoot into ballistic gel through heavy cloth, wallboard, plywood, sheet steel, and auto glass. They score based on penetration, expansion, retained weight, accuracy, reliability, etc. They shoot, they measure, they score, they buy millions of rounds...

    They are replacing their Speer 165 GD w a new enhanced 180 Ranger bonded load.
    After the next run of 180 Ranger Bonded (RA40B) in Feb 08, it will be identical to the new FBI duty load (Q4355).

    Most popular weight to US LE is the 180. Biggest federal customer is the DHS who buys mostly 155s, then the DOJ/FBI who bought mostly 165, until now when they have switched to 180 on the latest 5 year contract.
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2007
  5. possum

    possum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,942
    Location:
    Concord, N.C.
    that depends entirly on the gun which it is fired from and the shooter, some guns like some loads more than others, that can be either, they unction better, or they are more accurate, a defensive load is useless if it isn't 100% reliable. also what is controlable and shootable to the particular shooter has a big impact, if you can't put multiple rds on target and hit the target in a timely manner than the defensive rds are again useless.
     
  6. KBintheSLC

    KBintheSLC Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    3,197
    Location:
    Stalingrad, USA
    I think that the difference between these two excellent cartridges is negligible at best. I would try them both, and go with the one that gives you the best performance out of your gun. I use Gold Dot because none of the local gun shops here sell Rangers. However, it has been an excellent round and I have yet to see one that has a jacket failure.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page