Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Redhawk vs 629

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by aHFo3, Apr 2, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. aHFo3

    aHFo3 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2008
    Messages:
    547
    Location:
    Redmond, OR
    I have the opportunity to trade a Glock 17 plus some cash for

    A) 7.5" SS Ruger Redhawk that's been polished to shiny w/o original grips.

    B) 6.5" 629 Powerport with trigger work and hi viz sights, not sure what dash. Oh, it comes with a Galco Crossdraw holster.

    C) Your other suggestion here

    Looks like both deals would require $150 plush my used 2nd gen Glock. Both are 44 mags. I already have a 29-2 that is a good shooter, but I'd much rather have another 44 mag than the Glock.

    What would you do: A, B, or C?
     
  2. osteodoc08

    osteodoc08 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,261
    What are your intended uses? Do you plan on making it into a hunting gun with a scope? Range time but otherwise a safe queen?

    If looking for just a shooter, the slightly shorter barrel, trigger work, improved sights may be the ticket on the Smith.

    If looking for a long range handgun that you plan on putting a scope on and possibly hunting with, I'd suggest the Ruger.

    Both are fine guns IMHO.

    In regards to C, Id suggest a S&W or Ruger in 357 Mag. Great Range gun in the 4"/6" variety. Shoot 38 SPL for relatively cheap (compared to 44mag/spl) and have enough bang with nice Buffalo Bore ammo or the like.

    In the end, it's your glock, your money. As long as your happy, it really doesnt matter.
     
  3. Blue Brick

    Blue Brick Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,452
    Location:
    Pinal County, Arizona
    357 Ruger Redhawk
     
  4. Blue Brick

    Blue Brick Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,452
    Location:
    Pinal County, Arizona
  5. buck460XVR

    buck460XVR Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    5,833


    If both guns are in similar condition, for the same price, it's really a no-brainer.
     
  6. RDCL

    RDCL Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2009
    Messages:
    269
    Location:
    Westlake Ohio
    If you already have a "Smith" .44 mag....then I'd say get the Ruger. The Redhawk is a much stronger gun.

    (The S&W IS better looking though:D)


    Russ
     
  7. bluetopper

    bluetopper Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    3,221
    Location:
    Northeast TX
    If you pick the Ruger........you'll be kicking yourself after a day at the range.:banghead:

    I've had a few examples of them both. There is no comparison in the single-action trigger.
     
  8. unspellable

    unspellable Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,744
    Location:
    Iowa
    Ruger will hold up better. S&W has better ergonomics and with reasonably frequent use can be expected to wear loose before your grand kids hit social security. (If it's still around then.) The Ruger will last long enough for you great grand kids to use.
     
  9. W.E.G.

    W.E.G. Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    7,362
    Location:
    all over Virginia
    Don't like the shine... Don't like the ported barrel.

    I'd keep the Glock until something more suitable came along.
     
  10. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    45,657
    Location:
    Alabama
    Personally, I much prefer shooting my Ruger Redhawk .44 Mag than my Smith 29-3. My Redhawk .41 mag as well. :)

    Yes, the single action is not quite as nice, but very shootable. The double action on my three Redhawks is very very good.
     
  11. Slamfire

    Slamfire Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,528
    Location:
    Alabama
    The Redhawk is the better choice if you plan to load them hot.

    If you have long fingers and a big hand you might like the Redhawk, as the aftermarket rubber grips were made for mutantly large hands.

    I don't have huge hands so I traded my Redhawk off.

    But my M629 is a keeper.

    [​IMG]
     
  12. 22-rimfire

    22-rimfire Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    11,287
    Location:
    TN
    I'd also take the Redhawk if yo're okay with the barrel length.
     
  13. aHFo3

    aHFo3 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2008
    Messages:
    547
    Location:
    Redmond, OR
    Slamfire, nice! Is that a 5"?

    The intended purpose would be an everything gun: walking around in the woods, plinking, hunting, and showing friends.

    I'm not too concerned about the size. I'm 6'6" 230, so a couple extra inches aren't a big deal while in the woods.

    Also, I handload, so the appeal of hot loads through is Ruger is high, but I am a S&W guy. The polished finish is a turn off, and I have zero experience with the porting. The porting, from what I hear (no pun) it makes them quite a bit louder, and is an extra spot to clean, but I don't have any first hand experience with them.
     
  14. TwoNiner

    TwoNiner Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Messages:
    172
    Redhawk
     

    Attached Files:

  15. Boxhead

    Boxhead Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    600
    Location:
    Bouncing between Geoje Korea, The Texas Hill Count
    You could not give me a Redhawk. Take the Smith and load it with a good WFN at 275 grs or so at 1200 fps and it will do all are asking and not beat up the gun. I used that load two weeks on a pretty healthy hog and my hunting partner thought I was missing as he watched the mud fly beyond the pig after blowing threw it. I would have no problem hunting black bear, elk or moose with that load.
     
  16. roaddog28

    roaddog28 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    632
    Location:
    Escondido, CA
    Hi,
    Comparing a Ruger Redhawk to a Smith 629 is like comparing a Mack Truck to a Chevy pickup. The Redhawk is stronger and will take any factory ammo and also hand loaded ammo a person whats to put through the gun. The Redhawk will not have to be sent back for a "tune up". I have two Rugers. One is a Police Service Six 4 inch. Built in 1985 I have never had to replace any parts on the revolver. This revolver as seen many and many rounds of 357 ammo. My whole point is this. For durability and strength the Ruger. For refinement and trigger the Smith. Nothing wrong with a 629 but it you intend to shoot a lot of 44 magnums whether factory or hand loads you will probably being sending the 629 in from time to time for repair work. I doubt with the Ruger you would ever have to have any major work done.

    Good luck,
    roaddog28
     
  17. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    45,657
    Location:
    Alabama
    I like 5.5" Redhawks, and I like shooting them with the wooden grips.

    My 29-3 doesn't get shot much at all. I traded my first one because I never shot it, then got another because everyone should have one, but it sits idle in the safe. Beautiful gun though.

    It's mostly a recoil thing with me.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Apr 3, 2010
  18. Sunray

    Sunray Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    10,498
    Location:
    London, Ont.
    "...no comparison in the single-action trigger..." All new firearms require a trigger job due to frivolous U.S. law suits.
    "...have a 29-2..." If an M29 fits your hand, so will a 629. A 7.5" Redhawk weighs 54 oz. Nearly 4 lbs. A 6" M629 weighs 45 oz. Nearly 3 lbs. Both are roughly the same money. Toss a coin.
    "...don't have huge hands..." A SuperRedhawk has the same size grips as a GP100. Fits my short, but wide hands. Still a great, big, SOB.
     
  19. Magnumite

    Magnumite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    711
    Location:
    Belcamp, Maryland
    Since you have a Smith, I'd get the Ruger. From the factory, the Smith will probably have the better single action trigger. The Ruger action can be tuned to rival a good S&W action job. I know that personally.
    That Redhawk will take a steady diet of loads that will shoot the 29's loose. It's plenty accurate and is even competitive in fast double action shooting on bowling pins.

    I have my handload test target from years ago and it's a 3/4" group at 50 yards - off the bags, of course. While I don't keep round counts, an accurate estimate of this particular Redhawk's use is about 15,000 rounds...light, medium and heavy loads all included in that count. And it is still tight.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page