Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Reduced recoil 12ga options

Discussion in 'Shotguns' started by Arizona_Mike, Dec 30, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Arizona_Mike

    Arizona_Mike Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2013
    Messages:
    3,283
    Don't ask for my man card! This is a safety issue. I want to be able to fire buckshot in my new single trigger Lupara (link to thread in NFA subforum--discuss the gun there not here) without it doubling when fired one handed.

    What are good options out there are various payload and velocity options? When I had 18.5" of barrel my impression is that weight mattered a lot more than velocity (1 oz slugs were pretty mild) but it's now hard to tell between levels of recoil with a 12" barrel.

    Mike
     
  2. rodregier

    rodregier Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,677
    Location:
    Halifax,NS Canada
    Reduced recoil / tactical buckshot and slug loadings are available from most of the majors (Fed, win, Rem etc).

    They are reduced velocity and sometimes reduced mass (8 vs 9 pellet buck, for example).

    They will deliver recoil similar as a light trap load.

    Get a box of a light trap loading (2.75 dram equiv) and see if that is an acceptable recoil level in your candidate shotgun.

    Non-exclusive example of a light 12GA trap loading is Fed TGL12-8
    (2.75 dram equiv 1.125 oz #8 - 1145 ft/sec)

    Reduced loadings are what I run in my shotguns, including my 14" pump. Plenty of power for clay, paper or serious work. Followup shots are quicker with a light loading.

    n.b. short-barrelled manually operated shotguns are becoming popular in Canada since they are in the same classification category as a 30" shotguns due to the way Canada's firearm laws are written.
     
  3. oneounceload

    oneounceload member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,710
    Location:
    Hot and Humid FL
    Try reloading reduced loads - both in velocity and payload - your recoil reduction will be substantial. Remember the velocity component is squared in the recoil calculation so a slight reduction (or increase) has an exponential correspondence to the recoil
     
  4. Fred Fuller

    Fred Fuller Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2004
    Messages:
    21,221
    Location:
    AL, NC
  5. Arizona_Mike

    Arizona_Mike Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2013
    Messages:
    3,283
    Double post deleted.
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2013
  6. Arizona_Mike

    Arizona_Mike Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2013
    Messages:
    3,283
    I have found a couple types of 00 loadings locally that I will try soon. Hornady TAP 8 pellet @1100 fps and Herters 6 pellet at 1250 fps. Muzzle energy is about 60% of a standard load in both cases. I need to figure out a way to keep the wood forestock from loosening up first.

    The gun does not double with with low brass trap loads. I just shot 25 rounds of birdshot and 25 buck yesterday.

    It looks like mini-shells give about 5/8 oz of payload at 1200 fps. This should be about 45% the muzzle enenergy of a standard load. I suspect they would be downright mild.

    Mike
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2013
  7. Fred Fuller

    Fred Fuller Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2004
    Messages:
    21,221
    Location:
    AL, NC
  8. oneounceload

    oneounceload member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,710
    Location:
    Hot and Humid FL
    Get your payload (no matter the size) under 1oz, and get your velocity under 1200, and your recoil should be OK
    Plug your numbers into this:
    http://www.omahamarian.org/trap/shotshellenergy.html

    Use about 45 grains for the wad and about 19 grains for the powder and that should be real close
     
  9. Arizona_Mike

    Arizona_Mike Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2013
    Messages:
    3,283
    Thanks for the useful calculator.

    Mike
     
  10. Arizona_Mike

    Arizona_Mike Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2013
    Messages:
    3,283
    Here is what I have shot so far:

    1. Royal Buck 12ga 2.75" 9 pellet 00 Buck -- 1.125oz@1345 fps
    2. Olin "Military Grade" 12 ga 2.75" 9 pellet 00 Buck -- 1.125oz@1325 fps
    3. Hornday TAP Reduced Recoil 12ga 2.75" 8 pellet 00 Buck -- 1oz@1100fps
    4. Herter's Mini-Buckshot 12ga 2.25" 6 pellet 00 Buck -- 0.75oz@1250fps

    I know stated velocities are for a 30" barrel but shotguns loose very litte velocity after the first 10 or so inches of barrel length so I am going to take them as given. Also I know the calculated recoil energy is based on a simple conservation of momentum calculation for an unheld "floating" shotgun. Again, I will take them as given. The shotgun weighs 5lb even.

    Here are the muzzle energies / calculated recoil energies / perceived recoil rank / my comments
    1. 1978 ft-lbs / 41.8 ft-lbs / #1 / highest -- gun doubles when fired in one hand.
    2. 1919 ft-lbs / 40.7 ft-lbs / #2 / close 2nd -- gun doubles when fired in on hand.
    3. 1176 ft-lbs / 24.4 ft-lbs / #4 / kind of a rolling shove, very mild, not sharp -- gun does not double
    4. 1139 ft-lbs / 19.6 ft-lbs / #3 / less shove than full power but still sharp -- gun does not double

    Both #3 and #4 have about 60% of the muzzle energy of full power loads.
    #3 is supposed to have 25% more recoil than #4 but is in fact significantly more mild.

    A 1oz load at 1100fps is just about perfect for this gun. It seems to be a real sweet spot.

    Mike
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2014
  11. Kurt S.

    Kurt S. Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    420
    Location:
    Brewster County, Texas
    Although your "lupara" is a different animal than my Baikal coach gun, I agree with Fred Fuller's suggestion regarding Aguila Minishells . I find recoil as almost negligible from my coach gun. Advertised velocity (as I recollect) is 1200 FPS.


    "man card", haha! If you find 1oz slugs through a coach gun as "mild", IMHO nobody's got any business making remarks!
     
  12. spottedpony

    spottedpony Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    44
    First and foremost, realize I know nothing about this particular shotgun, thus, I comment or question, simply from past experience when adjusting triggers and having them set a bit too light.

    The fact you mention a double fire condition under certain conditions makes me think there is an unsafe trigger issue, either a trigger tuned, or adjusted way too light, thus making it unsafe, or a malfunction/design/wear issue resulting in an unsafe condition.
    In any event, if the gun doubles under any circumstances, perhaps a trip in for repair is in order.
    Just food for thought.
     
  13. ugaarguy

    ugaarguy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    12,013
    Spottedpony, it's not a safety issue, and it's not a trigger tuning issue. It's an issue with the size and weight of the gun as configured, which makes lower recoil ammo a necessity. Did you bother to click on the link to see the firearm being discussed?
     
  14. Arizona_Mike

    Arizona_Mike Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2013
    Messages:
    3,283
    I consider it a safety issue because I don't want to be pulling any triggers without conscious intent.

    The first sear breaks as 5.5lb and the second sear breaks at 6.25lb and requires the trigger to be let out nearly all the way to reset. It is bumpfiring from the elasticity of my hand under recoil from full power 12 ga when fired in one hand. Using full power loads with a second hand on the gun or one handed using reduced recoil buck or birdshot (even 3 dram).

    [​IMG]

    Mike
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page