Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Reloading LC Brass

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by whubbard, Mar 13, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. whubbard

    whubbard Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2011
    Messages:
    59
    So I picked up some MG fired LC Brass and M2 bullet pulls (147gr) from gibrass, basically to make some plinking ammo. I sat down and reloading a few just to try the next time I go to the range, I think I have about 8 reloaded. The case was trimmed to 2.010" and the bullet crimped on the cannelure. I loaded 43gr of IMR3031.

    Now here is my concern, I understand that Mil surplus brass can have thicker walls and therefore increase case pressure. Should I be worried with these rounds? 43gr is under maximum for a 150gr bullet (.308 Load data); however now I'm concerned due to the case thickness. Anybody have first hand experience with this? Thoughts?
     
  2. P-32

    P-32 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,050
    Location:
    the dry side of Washington St
    Yes, LC 30-06 and 7.62 Nato brass is a little heavier than some commercial brass. the GI brass is worth a grain or two less powder for sure. Winchester seems to be the lightest. So, what brass did your data book use during testing? The Speer I was looking at used IMI brass which is pretty close to LC brass. Also always start at the starting load and then work up.
     
  3. USSR

    USSR Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    8,482
    Location:
    Finger Lakes Region of NY
    First, if the bullets you have weigh 147gr and are boattail bullets, they are M80 pulls, not M2. Yes, 7.62x51 brass is heavier and has less case capacity than most commercial .308 brass, so reduce your charge weights accordingly. I load quite a bit of the M80 pulls in LC brass, and I use 43.0gr of IMR4895. Since IMR3031 is a faster powder, personally, I would reduce your charge weight by at least a half a grain. Just MHO.

    Don
     
  4. whubbard

    whubbard Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2011
    Messages:
    59
    That was a typo on the 147gr, they are 152gr. I'd heard the M2s were slightly more accurate than the M80 pulls so I spent the extra $25/1000.
    I'm probably going to pull these bullets since it's such a small number of them and knock back the load. I have 4 reloading manuals, Speer, Lyman 49, Sierra, and Lee. For this load I used the Sierra which I believe has 43.5gr listed as max for IMR3031.

    Don, do you feel that 43 with the M80s is as high as you will go? Or is it just a comfortable load?
     
  5. USSR

    USSR Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    8,482
    Location:
    Finger Lakes Region of NY
    That's as high as I will go with IMR4895 and M80 pulls. If I was loading M2 pulls like you are doing with IMR3031, I would drop down to 42.0, due to their longer bearing surface.

    Don
     
  6. whubbard

    whubbard Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2011
    Messages:
    59
    Great. Many thanks on the advice. I've got some IMR4895 as well which is why I was wondering.

    Looks like I'll pull & drop down to 42.0. I've got a Chrono too so I can see how the load is performing which will be nice.
     
  7. USSR

    USSR Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    8,482
    Location:
    Finger Lakes Region of NY
    +1. That's the best way to approach load development.

    Don
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page