Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

rem 700 scope and mount ?'s

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Tenn870, Jun 9, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Tenn870

    Tenn870 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2010
    Messages:
    78
    Location:
    Hagerstown, MD
    I am thinking of buying my first remington 700 bolt action. I have decided on the SPS tactical in .308 because I like its look, the short barrel and that it comes with a decent stock and heavy barrel. I will not be shooting targets at extreme distances with this barrel but how do these do at maybe 300-400 yds? I am somewhat new to longer range shooting and I have a good friend who will help me but before I call him up I want to have a pretty decent setup. What is a nice scope for under $200 that would be good for 100-300 yd ranges and that is of pretty good quality ... nikon prostaff? and should I go for the picatinny rail (http://www.opticsplanet.net/egw-remington-700-picatinny-rail-tactical-scope-mount.html) for the mount or normal rings?

    THANKS!
     
  2. ColtPythonElite

    ColtPythonElite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    7,657
    It may or may not be a tack driver right outta the box. You never know. Generally, it takes some ammo shopping or better yet, reloading to get the most out of a rifle....What are you gonna be shooting at at 300-400 yards? A man -sized silhouette target should be no trouble with the gun right out of the box with decent ammo. Hitting beer can sized targes might be another story.

    Personally, I'm "old school"...I like a one piece base and a good set of rights that are just the right height to almost have the scopes bell touch the barrel.
     
  3. Tenn870

    Tenn870 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2010
    Messages:
    78
    Location:
    Hagerstown, MD
    silhouettes would be the farther range shots but i would be mostly having fun with the 100 yard shots, whats a good scope?
     
  4. nastynatesfish

    nastynatesfish Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2009
    Messages:
    964
    Location:
    Thatcher arizona
    Look into tasco world class target scopes. Ill get alot of flak for putting that down but i had one on my 7mag for 3 years and never had a hitch with it.
     
  5. Archie

    Archie Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    1,926
    Location:
    Hastings, Nebraska - the Heartland!
    I'm not real familiar with current scopes. I would however caution you to spend as much as you can afford on a decent scope and mounts.

    Nasty has good luck with his Tasco; I've used one or two of the Chinese 'cheap' scopes with passable results. However, for my serious rifles I'll save up and spend good money on a Leupold scope and mounts. There are some other scopes of good solid quality, and no doubt someone will speak up shortly.

    If you're going to be shooting at 400 yards, you'll probably want a variable type scope to be able to see smaller targets at range. I'd think nothing less than a 3x9 variable for good results. If you rethink your ranges, a lesser powered scope will do.

    Good luck in any event.
     
  6. WNTFW

    WNTFW Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,906
    I like the Mueller scopes in the $200-250 range. I'm not saying other choices aren't good. I also suggest the EGW pic rail (20 MOA) and Burris XTR rings. I think that combination is pretty good on a budget.
     
  7. dldbrandon

    dldbrandon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    46
    Vortex Diamondback in either 3-9x40 or 4-12x40. The warranty with vortex is second to none. I wouldn't get the crossfire as it is made in china, the only product of there's that is, but the diamondback, which I have in 4-12x40 works great. They start at 189.99 with the BDC at 199.99.
     
  8. Mac2

    Mac2 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    81
    Location:
    Western NC
    I've had good experiences with the BSA 4 X 24 x 50 mildot with side focus. Have one on my 10/22 (overkill), one on my Rem 22-250 and Rem .308. I have learned the scope, which has helped my shooting with either rifle. They can be had at Midway on sale for around $150 and come with pretty decent Weaver style mounts. It worked for me...
     
  9. BrocLuno

    BrocLuno Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Messages:
    2,087
    Location:
    Kalif Kollective
    Once I get beyond 100 yds or so, I find that first focal plane becomes more important. Then there are the issues of mirage and flare control. The further out you go, the worse they become.

    For inexpensive, I'd look at Vector Optics first focal plane. Or used Leupold or any other good glass that rates well in tactical situations. It won't be cheap.

    If just fooling around, then there are lots of choices. We (TMan65 and I) recently tested the ~$80 CenterPoint from Wally World and it's been holding up fine. Not a great piece of work, but the 4-16 ought to show you what range and mounts work, etc. Once you have the mount and eye placement figured out for most comfortable fit, cheek weld, etc. - you can be on the look-out for a good used scope that has better optics.
     
  10. CMC

    CMC Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    224
    Location:
    Florida
    Look at the Weaver Scopes you can find a good quality for about 2 hundred bucks.
    I got the 2 piece Leupold steel weaver mounts on my 700.
     
  11. Haxby

    Haxby Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    994
    Check out the Nitrex TR1 3-9X42 or 3-10X50 at Natchezss for $150, and the Bushnell 4200 3-9X40 for $200 at Cabela's.
    That EGW base should work fine, or look at Burris XT or Weaver.
    I've used Leupold, Weaver, Burris, and Millett rings with no problems.
     
  12. Another_Kelley

    Another_Kelley Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2011
    Messages:
    103
    Location:
    Idaho
    +1 for the Vortex Diamondback. I use one on a rimfire exclusively now, but originally I had it on an old 22-250 and it seemed to handle the recoil well. If there's one thing I wouldn't skimp on it's rings/bases... You could put a $2000 scope on something with garbage rings and then find yourself re-adjusting the scope every time you go shoot ;) Happy Huntin'
     
  13. CMC

    CMC Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    224
    Location:
    Florida
  14. Shmackey

    Shmackey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,477
    Location:
    Colorado
    Mueller scopes are really good for that price range. That being said, a pretty good rule of thumb is to spend at least as much on your scope--probably more like twice as much--as you spent on your rifle. You'll get a much better end result than doing it the other way around.
     
  15. stonecutter2

    stonecutter2 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,180
    Location:
    Bloomington, IL
    I have a .223 Rem 700. Mine has a picatinny one piece rail, with rings that fit on it. And I have a Vortex Crossfire that's pretty darn huge, honestly.

    I like the combo and the look of it.

    The only issue I've had with my 700 is the last two rounds seem inclined to point too high upwards and thus don't feed properly. I'm chalking it up to break in on the spring right now.
     
  16. gamestalker

    gamestalker member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    9,832
    Location:
    SW Arizona
    You can put a 3x9x40 Leupold on it for around $200 and it will last a life time with flawless performance. Since your going to be shooting a high powered rifle that does produce a good bit of recoil, I would not consider something with sub quality eye relief. Leupold is top quality glass, will never leak, and does have generous eye relief, and their customer service is unmatched by anyone. Put some low bases on it, as low as you can go without touching the barrel. I like Z-rings personally and have been using them on every high powered rifle since the early 1980s without failure. They don't cost an arm and a leg but they are solid and strong.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page