Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Remington 710

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Gilbiy, Feb 12, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Gilbiy

    Gilbiy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1
    looking for opinions on this rifle. A neighbor is sell one in 30-06 w/ factory scope for $300.
     
  2. Husker1911

    Husker1911 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    993
    Location:
    La Vista, NE. Alright, Lincoln on Game day Saturda
    The 710 is not worthy of the Remington name. I'll offend those who've been suckered into buying this clunker, but there is one thing it's good for. Run your fishing line through the trigger guard, and throw it and your baited hook into the water. When the fish picks up your bait, he won't feel the weight on it, as it slips through the trigger guard. You'll have a chance at catching the fish this way. For heaven's sake, don't actually shoot this rifle!
     
  3. mathewsman99

    mathewsman99 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    Messages:
    21
    i agree with that they are not worth it
     
  4. dracphelan

    dracphelan Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2005
    Messages:
    706
    Location:
    Garland, TX
    This rifle has several things that disturb me:
    1. There are pieces of plastic replacing metal parts in the action of the rifle. This may be safe, but it worries me.
    2. If something happens to damage the barrel, you can not replace it.

    For about $50 more, you can get a Savage rifle package from Wal-Mart. Or, for the same money, you can buy a Mossberg 100 ATR and equal quality scope rings and scope. The 710 may be an OK rifle, but you can get better for an equal amount of money.
     
  5. brentwal

    brentwal Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2005
    Messages:
    407
    Location:
    Eastern Washington
    :eek: Run away!!!!!!!!:

    Go find a good Savage/Stevens.;)
     
  6. bogie

    bogie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    9,569
    Location:
    St. Louis, in the Don't Show Me state
    You can't change the barrel. The rifle was designed for Bubba Hunter, who fires one box of shells through it every coupla years.

    If you can't get any other rifle, I suppose this would be better from nothing. But I'd suggest brown bagging your lunch to work for a few weeks, and saving the $$ for a better rifle.
     
  7. Michael Courtney

    Michael Courtney Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    550
    Location:
    New York
    I would not own nor recommend the Rem 710.

    If you can find a used Rem 700 ADL, it is a much better rifle.

    Failing a used Rem 700 ADL, there are the Savage and Mossberg options that have been mentioned. I would also mention that H&R makes nice, servicable, reliable, accurate, and much higher quality rifles in a break (single-shot) action for about $200.

    In my opinion, the Rem 710 is the worst centerfire rifle in the market.

    Michael Courtney
     
  8. Ifishsum

    Ifishsum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2005
    Messages:
    936
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I own one and it's not that bad, but $300 used is too much. I paid $299 new locally. About the only thing you can change on them is the scope.

    I would not buy one again. I've since purchased 2 Savage rifles and they feel, look and shoot better than the 710 for about the same $.
     
  9. Twycross

    Twycross Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    254
    Location:
    FT Bragg, NC
    If you are just going to deer hunt a few times a year, or do a little odd target shooting, the 710 isn't bad. There are much better rifles in it's price range, but it's fine as long as you're not going to be doing any 'serious' shooting. And $300 used is too much. I picked mine up NIB for ~$340.
     
  10. Chawbaccer

    Chawbaccer Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,865
    I agree that 300 is too much, especially since a dealer won't want to give a ten cent trade in allowance for it.
     
  11. crazed_ss

    crazed_ss Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,652
    Location:
    Sunny San Diego
    Uh oh.. a box of shells every couple of years? :uhoh:

    I've put almost 3 boxes of Ammo through mine in a couple months. It hasnt blown up in my face yet. It's not the best rifle in the world, but it accurately and reliably puts holes in paper... cheap too.







    Disclaimer: Your experience may vary
     
  12. AStone

    AStone Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    24,176
    Location:
    Far N, E coast
    I wonder if Remington execs are reading this thread?

    If not, they should be.

    By my count, this rifle, while not totally worthless, is not drawing what I'd call rave reviews.

    At best, it gets, "Well, it wasn't worth the $300 I paid for it, but at least it hasn't blown up in my face!"

    If I had a choice between Rem 710 & Rem 700 (which I do), I'd eat ramen for a month longer and drink cheap beer in order to save pennies for a 700.

    YMMV.

    Nem
    ___

    Kahr K9
    Remington 870P
    SW 642
    CZ 452 Style
    {soon) 7mm08 in Rem 700 Mt LSS, Ruger M77, Savage 16FHSS, or Tikka T3
     
  13. crazed_ss

    crazed_ss Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,652
    Location:
    Sunny San Diego
    Well Like I said.. it's does what it's designed to do. It's not as refined as other rifles. The action isnt too smooth. In hindsight, I guess there's better deals out there to be had.

    I just wanted a rifle that was affordable and accurate for recreational shooting at the range. The 710 easy fullfills that requirement. I'd imagine if I took it hunting, it'd kill a deer just as effectively as a weapon costing 3 times as much.

    http://www.galleryofguns.com/shootingtimes/Articles/DisplayArticles.asp?ID=781

    [​IMG]

    Not bad IMO.
     
  14. AStone

    AStone Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    24,176
    Location:
    Far N, E coast
    Well said. I can't disagree.

    My beef is not with those who buy it, shoot it, and make the best of it,
    but with those who sell it even though for the price it could have been better.

    If they (and their supervisors) would only smoke a few less cigars, drive a smaller car
    & live in a less opulent house, the 710 would be an even better gun.

    But wait, that's not prudent business rational.

    Never mind.

    The 710 will do what it was designed to do.

    It will take deer and other game.

    Of that I have no doubt.

    Nem
     
  15. BigRobT

    BigRobT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2005
    Messages:
    399
    Location:
    North Central Texas
    I have a 710 and I agree, it is a piece of JUNK!! Mossberg has a new inexpensive bolt action rifle, the ATR-100. I looked at it and it is head & shoulders above the 710. Furthermore, it costs under $300, NIB!! It comes in assorted calibers, too.
     
  16. Schleprok62

    Schleprok62 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,009
    Location:
    Oklahoma City, OK
    I looked at the 710, briefly, and was not overly impressed. Then I looked at the Stevens model 200. And for the monry, I would go the Stevens route, especially after talking to the folks at Savage/Stevens about it and finding out that it is the old Savage 110 action and is mechanically compatible with all said upgrades...

    Verdict: Buy the Stevens, a box or two of shells, a basic 3-9x40 scope, go to the range, discover it's really quite accurate out of the box, disply :evil: :D :evil: because you only paid a little over $250 for it new, and sleep soundly at night knowing you got a great rifle for a little money... :cool:

    my $0.02
     
  17. RSABear

    RSABear Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Messages:
    43
    Location:
    Johannesburg
    Just happened to search on Google and picked up on this forum.

    I agree with most of the replies you got.

    I have a Model 710 in .270 Win, which I purchased in 2003 when my finances did not allow for a Model 700. It is a working rifle and has stood the test of time and hammering of a couple of thousand rounds very well. I hunt from semi-desert grasslands to thick bush in mountainous areas. The game I pursue is up to Deer or Elk size for the bigger species. I reload 100gr, 110gr, 130gr and 150gr Hornady VMax/Interbond ™ rounds to chronograph 100ft/sec slower than that of PMC’s factory published ballistic data. I had my teething problems with the rifle – hopefully it is now a sorted out. On approximately the 50th shot the Bolt handle came off! It was repaired under warranty by the local Remington agent; however it came off again a few shots later. This time a good job solved the problem once and for all. One of the first changes I made to the standard package was to replace the Bushnell scope with a Tasco 3-9x40. I did not want to over capitalise on the scope and got 2 Tasco’s for the price of a Leupold (The one is a spare). I never obtained sniper accuracy from my reloads, but have recently shot a 3-shot less than half an inch grouping with the 130gr (I did not measure it – I still have the target to a scan). I can count on a consistent 1.5 inch 5 shot group at 107 yards – I will blame the shooter more than the rifle for larger groupings. The bolt action and plastic bushings sucks! However, when the round is chambered this does not play any role further and the shot goes off every time. Lastly I found a Remington trigger adjustment guide on another forum – I took a couple of weeks and some rounds to get the trigger pull more suitable. I have also found that Winchester brass works very well, I have had a number of other brands get stuck and then you have to bump them out with a cleaning rod.

    Will I buy one again – only if I find myself in a worse financial position.

    Kind Regards form South Africa
    :cool:
     
  18. Blacklabman

    Blacklabman Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    Messages:
    179
    Location:
    N. Georgia
    I am not a big rifle fan (you can tell by usernane). I looked at the 710 and came away shaking my head. The quality was less than impressive. Since I deer hunt to take up time before Waterfowl season, I did not want to pour a lot of money into a rifle.
    I ended up buying a Savage 116FXP3 with Accu Trigger in 30-06. It is the synthetic stock, and stainless steel version. I have taken three deer with the rifle, and really like it. The total cost was right at $500 after tax.
     
  19. dfaugh

    dfaugh Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,994
    Well.... they make good boat anchors.......

    $300 is WAY too much, I think they sell/sold for less than that BRAND NEW...

    For $300 you should be able to find a much better used rifle....Or save up another $150 and get a new Savage, which is a FAR better gun.
     
  20. Ash

    Ash Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    5,358
    Location:
    Anywhere but here
    The 710 will shoot and is reasonably accurate. The problem is that it is not equal to but costs more than the Stevens 200 and Mossberg 100. Worse, it is the same price, within five cents or so, it is vastly inferior to the Savage 110 with Accutrigger. Repeat, for the SAME PRICE, you can get a Savage 110.

    That is like saying you would rather get a Ford Escort, because it drives reasonably well, when a Dodge Stratus costs the same price. You can get that Ford, but why?

    The 710 is a cynical attempt to capture the low-end market based solely on a name. With the 710, you get a REMINGTON, not a Mossberg or Savage. forget that the 710 is not the equal to the others, it's a REMINGTON and that is all you need to know. With a name like REMINGTON, it has to be good, right? It is a utilitarian gun, to be sure, but it still is not in the same league as the other rifles available, neither in construction, design, nor features.

    The 710 is the poorest quality centerfire rifle Remington has ever introduced. The Mossberg 100ATR, at $100 less ($50 less if you buy the $40 scope and $10 rings on the 710), is a superior rifle. The Stevens, with that same $50 discount, is VASTLY superior (and fully compatible with most after market Savage parts). With two rifles that are better and $50 cheaper, what possible reason would there be to get the 710? While Big Green has a nice name, that's a bunch of cash to lay out for a name.

    Ash
     
  21. ojr

    ojr Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2006
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    New Zealand
    The Big Green has'nt got that good a name anymore,checked there new wood/blue CdL lately,lousy bluing and stock to action/barrel fit not worthy of Nirinco.Maybe it's because we are small over here but I tell you almost no-body buys remington anymore.
     
  22. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    I just combed through a lot of Remington's latest product line, and they've cleaned up their fit and finish.

    One major transgression: they still sell the 710.

    An aside: I saw a used sporterized SMLE 1/3 -- not bubba-ized; might have been a professional job back in the 1950s or something. It was in excellent condition, with iron sights. For the $150 they wanted for it, it would be a far better choice than a 710!
     
  23. Bwana John

    Bwana John Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,852
    Location:
    Northern AZ
    Yea, right.:rolleyes:
     
  24. _N4Z_

    _N4Z_ Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,014
    Location:
    Michigander lost in... The Yonders, Oklahoma
    So then Remingtons 597 must be the little brother to the 710...

    Sounds like pretty much the same plastic bag of poo in a bigger package. :barf:
     
  25. Ash

    Ash Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    5,358
    Location:
    Anywhere but here
    You know, I saw a Mossberg 1500 for sale in Franklinton Louisiana in a cut-checkered walnut stock in 7mm Rem Mag, used but in excellent condition, for $300, with scope. That's the same rifle as a Weatherby Vanguard or Howa 1500 and is monumentally better than the 710.

    My Revelation (Mossberg Model 810) in 30-06 cost me $200 and came in an impressed-checkered walnut stock and is VASTLY better than that 710 (IMO, it is better than the current crop of 700's, 70's, or 110's, but thats an opinion).

    I picked up a nearly new condition Western Field (Mossberg 800) in 308 that cost me $280. It was a low-end rifle in the 1960's, and is better by leaps and bounds than the 710.

    Ash
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page