Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Remington Rand Model 1911A1

Discussion in 'NFA Firearms and Accessories' started by fishman002, Jun 14, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. fishman002

    fishman002 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1
    I recently came across a model 1911A1 Remington Rand that was for sale at a local gun show. The pistol had the serial number 1. Thats right, 1. He told me it was the first Remington Rand manufactured. The asking price was $7500. Real or Fake??
     
  2. SharpsDressedMan

    SharpsDressedMan member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Messages:
    5,957
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    We will need detailed pictures, a metalurgical sample, and then a hands on examination to be sure..................
     
  3. rondog

    rondog Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    6,833
    Location:
    Commurado
    My money says fake.
     
  4. cyclopsshooter

    cyclopsshooter Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,241
    Location:
    The Shadow Knows...
    Anyone with a set of letter punches can make up a military looking receiver. You really need to know the font subtleties, patina, even milling marks can be a clue.

    At the very least stop in and ask if you can take a few photos- If you do id be interested in seeing them on here.
     
  5. GRIZ22

    GRIZ22 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    5,225
    IIRC (and if I don't I know someone will chime in) manufacturers were issued blocks of serial numbers to use during WWII. 1 would have been used long before.
     
  6. Sunray

    Sunray Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    11,479
    Location:
    London, Ont.
  7. 14427H

    14427H Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Messages:
    98
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Could be a "Lunchbox" . Any proof marks? Some RR's were carried out of the factory in lunch boxes, a piece at a time. Easy to add the "1".
     
  8. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    22,922
    There have been a lot more serial numbers filed off or faked than guns carried out in lunchboxes. If you have such a gun, it is up to you to prove it is not a pilfered weapon with the serial number illegaly deleted or altered.
     
  9. blackwalnut

    blackwalnut Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    166
    Location:
    northeaster ohio
    Re: Rem Rand #1....

    Hey I own Serial #1 so it has to be a fake! I also have the Kaisers Luger that he hunted deer and boar with in the Black Forest. And to top it off I have John Brownings personal 1911A1 and his Colt Ace! I hear the Fuhrers personsal P38 has been available at alot of the Ohio gunshows along with the table cloth from his wedding reception to Eva complete with gravy stains!

    The list goes on and on.... I have heard some really farfetched stories that go along with the faked goods.
     
  10. AlexanderA
    • Contributing Member

    AlexanderA Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3,306
    Location:
    Virginia
    There is no Remington Rand serial #1. R-R serial numbers start with 1,279,699. The thing is a self-evident fake.

    Note: There was a Remington - UMC M1911 with serial #1. Their serial numbers ran from 1 to 21,676, and duplicated Colt numbers. This was a WWI thing.
     
  11. AlexanderA
    • Contributing Member

    AlexanderA Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3,306
    Location:
    Virginia
    Checking other sources, it seems that Remington-Rand serial numbers started with 916,405. Nevertheless, my point remains the same.

    Speaking of M1911A1 serial numbers, here's a mystery: I have a Colt Commercial M1911A1 with serial number C217xxx. Yet according to the serial number tabulations, Colt stopped commercial production in 1942 with serial number C215018 and didn't resume until 1946 with serial number C221001. Is my pistol an impossibility or are the charts wrong?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page