Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Repeal the 86 ban?

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Outlaws, Oct 19, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Outlaws

    Outlaws Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,481
    Location:
    Valley of the Sun
    You would have thought that with Republicans controlling both the House, Senate AND the White House, that the NRA would have attempted to get this repealed.
     
  2. Kenneth Lew

    Kenneth Lew Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Messages:
    534
    Thats a good one.
     
  3. selector67

    selector67 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Messages:
    276
    Location:
    TN.
    LOL, thats a good one, you had me going there for a minute.:neener:
     
  4. Kenneth Lew

    Kenneth Lew Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Messages:
    534
    BTW, a lot of "NRA members only" ranges frown upon NFA items.
     
  5. Outlaws

    Outlaws Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,481
    Location:
    Valley of the Sun
    Now thats a good one. They should all have their NRA memberships revoked for treason.
     
  6. swingset

    swingset Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,477
    Location:
    Ohio
    Yeah, I'm with you. I can't believe a bunch of professional politicians weren't lining up to get labeled "Pro Assault Weapon", "Arming Criminals with Machine Guns", etc. Considering 95% of gun owners are Fudds, I can see the compelling push to do this.

    Oh well, let's elect some Dems instead, they'll fight for our rights.

    :eek:
     
  7. DTakas

    DTakas Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2006
    Messages:
    31
    I am a member of an NRA only range and they are more than happy to welcome full autos. But I am aware that as a general rule the NRA does not want to be associated with NFA weapons.

    I do think it is possible to have it repealed but extremely unlikely. A Supreme Court decision is probably the most likely way it would happen, but based on the Supreme Court’s track record for taking 2nd Amendment cases it's probably not going to happen there either.
     
  8. SuperiorMarksman_18

    SuperiorMarksman_18 member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Messages:
    136
    Location:
    Virginia Beach, Virginia
    I don't think the range I go to allows full autos. They don't even allow rapid fire for God's sake!
     
  9. SuperiorMarksman_18

    SuperiorMarksman_18 member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Messages:
    136
    Location:
    Virginia Beach, Virginia
    I don't think the range I go to allows full autos. They don't even allow rapid fire for God's sake!
     
  10. Number 6

    Number 6 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    828
    There is an assumption thrown around be a lot of people that if you control both houses of congress you can get any legislation through that you want. This just is not true. With any piece of legislation there are many hurdles that the legislation must go through for it to become law, and at many points along the way it can be held up by the minority. Having a majority does not equal having the ability to do as you please. The same logic applies to those who think if the republicans lose both houses there absolutely will be another AW ban. It could happen, but one does not equal the other without a lot of other things happening.
     
  11. BobTheTomato

    BobTheTomato Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2006
    Messages:
    612
    Location:
    Alabama
    I can see the campaign ad now, "He voted to allow fully automatic weapons onto our streets!" Cue the picture of the mini gun dropping brass everywhere...... If the republicans rammed this through they would end up losing like the dems did after the assualt ban.
     
  12. P0832177

    P0832177 member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Messages:
    896
    Location:
    Mpls.,MN
    There were some trade offs with the GCA of 86, that most of you probably take advantage of. IE mail order of reloading supplies and ammo!

    I have no problem with ranges banning full auto fire, and the reason is the abilities of shooters them selves. Just cause you own a full auto does not mean you can shoot it safely!

    Remember the greatest good for the greatest amount of people here applies. An open range is just that a range accessible by all shooters, not just a select few! I know that all one has to do is look at floor, walls, and ceiling of an indoor range or the target holders of an outdoor range to know that people can not hit the target! It is a crying shame to see how bad of shots some people are!
     
  13. wdlsguy

    wdlsguy Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2004
    Messages:
    2,880
    Location:
    TX
    And until that changes I do not want to be associated with the NRA.
     
  14. EShell

    EShell Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2003
    Messages:
    298
    Location:
    MD
    Why would a Republican House, Senate and White House lead to repeal when a Republican White House signed the ban?

    Look back at the federal firearms laws and please point me to one that **wasn't** signed by a Republican.

    Republicans and Democrats . . . don't kid yourself, they're just two wings on the same bird.

    As stated above, the NRA disassociates itself with certain types of firearms and shooters, it's how they stay popular with duck hunters.
     
  15. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    A. Rifle forum is the wrong place to post this. So I am moving it to L&P.

    Lincoln Chaffee is a Republican. Michael Bloomberg is a Republican. For that matter John Dingell is a Democrat. I would suggest that if you think that the reason the NRA doesn't bring up this issue is because while there may be a majority of Republicans, there aren't a majority of people who support a repeal of the 1986 ban and NRA doesn't want to lose the ones it does have in Congress by asking them to carry out a suicide charge that may get them unelected.

    Why stop there? Why not refuse to vote in Congressional elections as well until they change to what you want? I am sure the technique will be just as successful.

    Edited to add:
    Sorry, this is a duplicate of a currently existing L&P thread and will be closed. The discussion can continue at the original thread here:

    http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=222939
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page