Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Resources

Discussion in 'Activism' started by hso, Feb 2, 2011.

  1. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    Senators Up For Re-election in 2014 that need to be converted or replaced

    The following is a list of Senators who are up for reelection in 2014. Where I have knowledge of a Senator's current stance on gun control, I have added that information. If you have received a letter from a Senator on this list expressing support, partial opposition or opposition to additional gun control, please share that informaton with us and I will update the original post to reflect that. This post is not intended to advocate for or against a party in a political fashion but rather just to let Second Amendment minded voters see who is walking the walk. As you can see, the antis are bipartisan in nature.


    Alabama - Jeff Sessions (R) - Pro-Second. No current statement found.
    Alaska - Mark Begich (D) - CURRENTLY OPPOSING ANY NEW GUN CONTROL MEASURES
    Arkansas - Mark Pryor (D) - Gave vague non-answer when recently questioned
    Colorado - Mark Udall (D) - SUPPORTS GUN CONTROL
    Delaware - Chris Coons (D) - NRA F rating. No current statement found.
    Georgia - Saxby Chambliss (R) - Gave vague non-answer in response to pro-2A letter
    Hawaii - Brian Schatz (D) - No current statement found
    Idaho - Jim Risch (R) - NRA A+ rating. No current statement found.
    Illinois - Richard Durbin (D) - SUPPORTS GUN CONTROL
    Iowa - Tom Harkin (D) - SUPPORTS GUN CONTROL
    Kansas - Pat Roberts (R) - Gave vague non-answer in response to pro-2A letter
    Kentucky - Mitch McConnell (R) - Gun control takes a back seat to spending issues
    Louisiana - Mary Landrieu (D) - Suggested support for expanding NICS in response to pro-2A letter
    Maine - Susan Collins (R) - Supported past AWBs and gave vague statement supporting more gun control
    Massachusetts - John Kerry (D) - SUPPORTS GUN CONTROL
    Michigan - Carl Levin (D) - SUPPORTS GUN CONTROL
    Minnesota - Al Franken (D) - Has supported gun control; but dodged question when asked about more gun control
    Mississippi - Thad Cochran (R) - NRA A-rated. No current statement found.
    Montana - Max Baucus (D) - We must bring ourselves together for an honest national conversation about every aspect in this terrible attack from assault weapons to the media’s coverage of these events to how we address mental illness
    Nebraska - Mike Johanns (R) - SUPPORTS SECOND AMENDMENT
    New Hampshire - Jeanne Shaheen (D) - SUPPORTS GUN CONTROL
    New Jersey - Frank Lautenberg (D) - SUPPORTS GUN CONTROL or Cory Booker (D) - Supports Registration
    New Mexico - Tom Udall (D) - Gave vague non-answer to reporter
    North Carolina - Kay Hagan (D) - Supported AWB in 2009 but gave non-commital vague answer to reporter
    Oklahoma - Jim Inhofe (R) - NRA A+ rating. No current statement found.
    Oregon - Jeff Merkley (D) - Seeking to end filibuster in Senate. Some past gun control support. No current statement found.
    Rhode Island - Jack Reed (D) - SUPPORTS GUN CONTROL
    South Carolina - Lindsey Graham (R) - SUPPORTS SECOND AMENDMENT
    South Carolina (special to replace Jim DeMint) - Tim Scott (R) - SUPPORTS SECOND AMENDMENT
    South Dakota - Tim Johnson (D) - No current statement found
    Tennessee - Lamar Alexander (R) - SUPPORTS SECOND AMENDMENT
    Texas - John Cornyn (R) - NRA A rated - Gave vague non-answer to pro-2A letter
    Virginia - Mark Warner (D) - Supported increased NICS checks in recent response letter
    West Virginia - OPEN SEAT (Jay Rockefeller retiring)
    Wyoming - Mike Enzi (R) - SUPPORTS SECOND AMENDMENT

    The guys giving vague answers on either side need to hear from us. They are wobbly and waiting for direction. The guys opposing us vocally already need to go. We need to start planning now how to help their primary opponents and general election opponents in 2014.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2013
  2. CAR-AR

    CAR-AR Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2011
    Messages:
    119
    Location:
    Florida
    I contacted both of my senator and my rep and I got one form letter (senator) and nothing my rep.
     
  3. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    48,357
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Great piece of information to put to use and well worth sticking to the forum!

    We can change the information about Alexander since my correspondence with him has been completely specific and supportive of RKBA. No new restrictions, enforcement of current laws, improvement of NICS to avoid issues like Cho, mental health.

    Here are two replies to me.

     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2013
  4. GAMALOT

    GAMALOT Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    237
    Location:
    NY Catskill mountains
    Writing a letter to my NY Senators would be a complete waste of time and effort.
    If Obama was to stop short Schummer would have to be surgically removed and Gillibrand would probably have a broken nose.:banghead::banghead::banghead:
     
  5. Yo Mama

    Yo Mama Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,851
    Sorry, but IMO, the Senate no longer matters, they will pass it. They have the votes, and the momentum.

    The House is the only place to stop it.
     
  6. Hokkmike

    Hokkmike Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,376
    Location:
    Sullivan County PA
    Yo Mama has got it right! BUT, the Senate must be made to look ahead at the next election cycle.
     
  7. GAMALOT

    GAMALOT Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    237
    Location:
    NY Catskill mountains
    I do agree that Yo Mamma is spot on and also about the next election cycle the D' will have to go through.

    Here is some more food for thought. Remember who you voted for when that next election cycle comes around. We are our own worst enemies and somewhere north of 52% of all American voters keep putting these jerk blocks back in office.
     
  8. Quick Shot xMLx

    Quick Shot xMLx Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2011
    Messages:
    197
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Here's the reply I got from Senator Kay Hagan (D) in NC. She has a gift for talking a lot but not saying anything. At the end of the day Hagan is a party hack, she'll vote for whatever the Dem leaders tell her to vote for. She's not going to fight in the trenches for anything but she'll follow like a sheep.

     
  9. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    48,357
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Another angle

     
  10. vamo

    vamo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    737
    Location:
    Missouri
    reply from claire mccaskill

    Thank you for contacting me regarding the recent shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, as well as gun control policy and gun safety. I appreciate hearing from you and welcome the opportunity to respond.

    On Friday, December 14, 2012, a gunman entered Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, and began shooting teachers and students before taking his own life. This horrific tragedy took the lives of 27 people, including 20 children seven years of age and younger. As a mother, I'm horrified and stunned by the senseless violence against innocent children and teachers.

    This tragedy has led to renewed and important discussions about gun control, which is often a divisive topic in our nation. The loss of so many beautiful children in a mass shooting that involved an assault rifle with ammunition clips that held large numbers of bullets makes clear that we need to revisit the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 and review permissible magazine ammunition sizes. I am also supportive of closing the gun show loophole and making sure that those with court-determined, dangerous mental health diagnoses do not get access to guns. Finally, it is equally clear that we must reconsider the mental health services available to our citizens, knowing that each mass shooting our nation has experienced involved individuals with substantial mental health problems. "Obamacare" will expand important mental health coverage when it is implemented in 2014. Protecting our children and our citizens will require us to come together to find real solutions that cover a broad range of factors that have contributed to these horrific incidents.

    I firmly believe that an attempt to promote appropriate gun safety measures can be done without infringing upon law-abiding citizens' right to own firearms or unduly burdening the hunting and sportsmanship culture of Missouri. Weapons designed primarily for the use of soldiers to kill people in war are not used in hunting and can be reasonably limited without jeopardizing any rights under the Second Amendment. I believe the horror of the Newtown shootings makes clear that we must get to work protecting our communities and our children from mass slaughter, while also protecting our Second Amendment rights. I am hopeful that the National Rifle Association, a significant voice in this discussion, will be a constructive part of this dialogue.

    Even as I welcome this renewed debate, please know that I will continue to protect the Second Amendment Rights of law-abiding citizens to safely own and use appropriate firearms. In the past, I have voted to permit residents of the District of Columbia to own and purchase firearms. I also supported an amendment to a spending bill that would prevent funding for any international organization, including the United Nations, that places a tax on any firearm owned by a United States citizen. I have opposed other inappropriate measures, such as forcing Missouri to accept other states' firearms laws.

    As your United States Senator, I will keep your thoughts in mind anytime Congress considers gun-related legislation. In the wake of the Newtown tragedy, my prayers are with the students and staff at Sandy Hook Elementary, and with their families. All Americans are outraged at senseless and criminal gun violence no matter where they may fall in the debate on guns in American society. A renewed national conversation has begun and we must all be a constructive and open-minded part of it. There is middle ground here, where this nation can come together with sensible laws that prevent the mass murder of innocent citizens, while we continue to respect our Constitution and its Second Amendment rights.

    Again, thank you for contacting me. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future if I can be of further assistance to you on this or any other issue.



    No surprise she favors controls I am sure its the standard form letter sent to pro 2a writers.
     
  11. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    48,357
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Grand Replies from Congresspersons combined thread

    Some of the pro 2A replies make good starting points for us to use to send more letters on to the Congresspersons that aren't committed one way or the other.

    The Anti letters give us insight into the thinking of those politicians and make the fact that they need to be replaced instead of reelected vividly clear.
     
  12. ZeSpectre

    ZeSpectre Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Location:
    Deep in the valley
    Sen Mark Warner, Virginia

    Dear Mr. XXXXXXXX,

    Thank you for contacting me to share your thoughts on the tragic events in Newtown, Connecticut and your views on gun control.

    On December 14, 2012, 20 innocent children and six adults lost their lives in one of the worst, most tragic shootings to ever occur in the United States. As a parent of three daughters, this was the ultimate nightmare. Like the Virginia Tech and Columbine shootings, this tragedy unfolded in what was once regarded as a safe haven free of crime and violence: a school.

    I am a strong supporter of the Second Amendment constitutional right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms. I own firearms and I have an "A" rating from the National Rifle Association. However, I also recognize that, like with many of our constitutional rights, our Second Amendment rights are not without limits. It is unfortunate that a tragedy of this magnitude is what is needed to prompt action, but we need to have a serious discussion on how to best avoid these kinds of mass shootings in the future. The status quo is not acceptable.

    I believe our discussion should cover many issues. We can start by improving the existing criminal background check system. Currently, the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) is woefully incomplete, with many states failing to submit available records on persons who may be disqualified from purchasing or possessing firearms. With a more complete background check system, we can keep firearms out of the hands of those who have been deemed unfit to possess them.

    In addition, we can take common sense measures such as passing the CAMPUS Safety Act (S. 3682), which I introduced last year. That bill would establish a national center for campus public safety within the Department of Justice to serve as a resource center and assist schools and universities in developing campus safety plans and threat assessment tools. We also need to look at changes to our mental health system so we can provide help to those with dangerous mental illnesses before it is too late. There will not be a single solution, but all of these issues and others need to be part of the conversation and I urge you to continue to express your views as we move forward.

    Again, thank you for contacting me. For further information or to sign up for my newsletter please visit my website at http://warner.senate.gov.

    Sincerely,
    MARK R. WARNER
    United States Senator
     
  13. ZeSpectre

    ZeSpectre Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Location:
    Deep in the valley
    ALSO from Sen Mark Warner, VA

    Dear Friend,

    Thank you for taking the time to share your views and experiences with me.

    If you need assistance resolving a specific problem with a federal agency, please contact my office at 703-442-0670 or toll free at 1-877-676-2759. Otherwise, please be assured that we are reading and responding to your comments and opinions as fast as we can.

    As the 112th Congress moves forward, please continue to be in touch with your views.


    Sincerely,
    MARK R. WARNER
    United States Senator
     
  14. poboy6

    poboy6 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages:
    82
    Location:
    MO
    I've received no reply from Ms. McCaskill (MO). I made sure to remind her that 2A has nothing to do with hunting.

    The letter vamo posted is exactly the same that others have reposted from her. We can call her office but is there a way to speak to her personally? Does anyone have her cell number?
     
  15. Green Lantern

    Green Lantern Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,665
    Update on Hagan from GRNC:
     
  16. Axel Larson

    Axel Larson Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Messages:
    485
    Location:
    Vermont, now Saint Albans
    This was my Governor's response.
    Thank you for writing to me in response to the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT. The grief and shock that we all share is overwhelming and has led to a national conversation about ways to stop violence in our communities. I want to thank you for taking the time to add your voice to that conversation.



    The last month has given me opportunity to reflect, and while there is no one policy change that can prevent a tragedy like this from happening again, I believe we must explore initiatives that will strengthen the safety of our communities. The role of firearms is one part of that discussion, and while I support the right of law abiding citizens to own guns, I believe it is appropriate to have a broader dialogue about what we can do to keep weapons of war out of the wrong hands. However, I strongly believe that to address gun violence we need a 50-state solution. I fully support the efforts of President Obama and Vice President Biden to develop a sensible, federal response to help prevent future tragedies, and I encourage Congress to enter into a vigorous and thoughtful debate on this issue.



    In addition, my administration continues to focus on strengthening communities and providing for the well-being of Vermonters by working to improve Vermont's mental health and social services. Many Vermonters have also written to me about the importance of reviewing school security procedures. These concerns warrant further examination and I will be working with my administration and legislators to determine how we can respond to this crisis at the state level.



    As citizens of this country, we are all called upon to reflect on the small actions we can take every day to build stronger, safer communities. I thank you again for joining me in this effort. Like all Vermonters, I am heartbroken by this tragedy, and my heart and thoughts are with the loved ones of the victims in Connecticut.



    Please do not hesitate to contact my office if I can be of further assistance.





    Sincerely,

    Peter Shumlin

    Governor

    109 State Street, Pavilion
    Montpelier, Vermont 05609
    802-828-3333

    Visit Governor Shumlin’s Online Resources:

    And he had a A rating from the NRA(not any more) I can't believe I voted for him.
     
  17. GAMALOT

    GAMALOT Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    237
    Location:
    NY Catskill mountains
    He is a guy who would never get a vote from me!

    I personally believe we could use a chain saw to cut off the entire NE Quadrant and ship it off to the Pacific region where these liberals belong.
     
  18. avs11054

    avs11054 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    Messages:
    649
    Location:
    AZ
    Why should we give up on the senate? We still have a fillibuster.
     
  19. Axel Larson

    Axel Larson Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Messages:
    485
    Location:
    Vermont, now Saint Albans
    Sounds like the NRA needs to do more back work on their rating system. Needless to say I will not be voting for him again.
     
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2013
  20. HeathH

    HeathH Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Messages:
    7
    Reply from Sharrod Brown - OH

    Here is the response I received from Senator Sharrod Brown. Kind of what I expected out of him.

     
  21. GAMALOT

    GAMALOT Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    237
    Location:
    NY Catskill mountains
    Sherrod Brown just gave you the old "Check is in the mail" brush off!

    The vast majority of the Senate have one motto they will live and die by, "Never allow a good crisis to go to waste".

    As Patriots, Gun Owners and Second amendment advocates we should be absolute in our convictions and allow them to die from their elected positions.

    Most of these fools would seriously hurt themselves if you put any gun in their hand short of a single action or revolver.
     
  22. HeathH

    HeathH Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Messages:
    7
    The long and short of my reply to him is I will be actively campaigning against him in his next election cycle. Little does he know I already campaigned against him this year. He does have a huge urban machine going in Ohio and it will be extremely hard to oust him.
     
  23. PigButtons

    PigButtons Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    147
    Location:
    N Alabama
    Thank you for keeping us up to date

    Your work is greatly appreciated. Having written to both Senators here neither has replied, whereas Mo. Brooks, our districts Congressman, wrote back a very Pro2A email in less than 48 hours. I'll be continuing to email my Senators until I receive a response.
     
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2013
  24. Catshooter

    Catshooter Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    384
    Location:
    south east South Dakota
    Thank you for this helpful post. I emailed Tom Harkin letting him know that I would work to see him defeated should he support gun control.


    Cat
     
  25. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    48,357
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    People who have never been to a gun show are standing in line for hours for the chance to purchase a semiautomatic rifle. People who might have been to one or two shows are standing in line for hours to purchase a semiautomatic rifle. Shops emptied of every AR on the shelves. Manufacturers and suppliers and retailers back ordered with no prediction on how quickly they can stock those shelves. Gun shows reporting the highest attendance in their history. Shops reporting customers lined up before opening for the chance to be first to purchase whatever new inventory may have been stocked overnight. Why? Because the people standing those lines and purchasing the firearms reflect the attitude held by hundreds of people for every one in the lines that firearms aren't the cause of violent crime.

    That attitude of those people is supported by the facts of the Obama administration's FBI in the Uniform Crime Reports. The UCR shows, without emotion or bias or political purpose, that while sales of AR-15 type rifles have gone up, violent crime rates have been dropping over the decades. While more and more people purchase the AR-15 for competition, recreation, and hunting everything from rabbits to deer to destructive wild hogs the use of rifles in murders has dropped to less than the number of people murdered with hands and feet year after year.

    The facts show us that violent crime is down, murders are down, and gun crimes are down in the face of rising rates of firearms sales. When you can't find a correlation showing violent crime rate increases with rising firearms sales logic tells you that the assumption that firearms have anything to do with violent crime rates is wrong and the assumption must be abandoned as a false premise. A new assumption about the causes of violent crime must be sought if we actually want to reduce violent crime.

    No new legislation restricting firearms or magazine or ammunition purchases will have any chance of reducing violent crime rates in the U.S. because they simply aren't correlated with violent crime rates.
     

Share This Page