Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Revolver future purchase

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by clay_07, Jan 29, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. clay_07

    clay_07 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    7
    I am trying to decide between the Taurus 850 or 851, also looking at the S&W 642. Thanks
     
  2. Black Knight

    Black Knight Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,439
    Location:
    Charlottesville, VA
    I am a S&W fan so of the 3 you mentioned I would choose the S&W 642.
     
  3. Pfletch83

    Pfletch83 member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Messages:
    354
    I'm thinking about picking up the new S&W 410,45LC,45 ACP revolver because well... I think it would be a dandy snake pistol...and I could leave the more lethal stuff stoked in the Mossberg.
     
  4. content

    content Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,015
    Location:
    South Carolina, born in Valley Forge Pa.
    Hello friends and neighbors // I'd spend the extra $40.00 on the S&W but I prefer the 442. I do not like my SD guns to be shinny, it is to easy for the BG to spot/track your gun.

    Also if you have a problem with the Taurus I believe you have to ship it to Brazil.

    Good luck finding what works for you.
     
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2011
  5. okc-zee

    okc-zee Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Messages:
    254
    Location:
    OKC,OK.
    642...
     
  6. atlctyslkr

    atlctyslkr Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    477
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Buy a 642 and then take a picture.
     
  7. MIL-DOT

    MIL-DOT member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2006
    Messages:
    3,110
    Location:
    Georgia,C.S.A.
    I also vote 642. I got one a couple months ago from CDNN for $349, and am waiting on the $50 rebate. I saw one at a local gunshow yesterday for about $350, though I believe the rebate offer has ended.
    Still, S&W is widely acknowledged to have excellent customer service, while Taurus is equally ackowledged as being abysmal. Plus, I've read way too many reports of new Taurus's having issues, forcing them to deal with the above mentioned abysmal customer service. Why even take the chance just to save a very few bucks ? Besides, you'll have better re-sale potential with the Smith. Go with the 642. ;)
     
  8. clay_07

    clay_07 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    7
    Thank You everyone for the reply's. Does anyone have a good suggestion on where to get one at a good price. I was looking at Buds Guns.
     
  9. Shoot&Ski

    Shoot&Ski Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    35
    Location:
    Montana
    Not to throw in a wrench, this isn't one of your three options and it looks like you want a small CCW and an enclosed hammer, but the Ruger Sp 101 is a dandy too and there is the added benefit of shooting in either single or double action.
     
  10. mdThanatos

    mdThanatos Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    623
    Location:
    NA
    I will recommend to, if you can, look at each one individually. Get a feel for what is best fit for you. Use the checklist to see which is in best condition, today I went to look at revolvers at Academy and just to get a feel for Taurus I looked at an 856. The display model they let me inspect had a really sharp forcing cone, the back and forth movement of the cylinder was very noticeable and 4 of the cylinders had a lot of wiggle when in full lockup, this was supposed to be a new gun but for me it didn't feel like it.
     
  11. TheGent

    TheGent Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    Messages:
    39
    Though I have had good experiences with Taurus revolvers I still say the 642. I love my 637. The 638 was a good one too. But it was passed along to a good friend.
     
  12. S&Wfan

    S&Wfan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,311
    Location:
    Georgia
    You'll never regret the purchase of either a 442 or a 642, though you'd probably regret the Taurus later when you realized that the Smith is a much better respected snubbie . . . and resale prices prove it when you step up later.

    The SP101 is a nice revolver too, but it is heavier and bulkier . . . and what good is a CCW gun when you didn't have it on you when trouble surprises you like a stray lightning bolt in the dead sleep of night?

    Get the Airweight snubbie . . . it is a gun you can carry "always."

    IT HAPPENED TO ME TODAY . . .

    I forgot my Airweight was in my pocket when I entered church. Getting ready to slide my keys in my pocket, I felt the Airweight Smith. Oops, it is illegal to carry in church in my state.:eek: "Honey, I forgot something in the car, I'll be right back!"

    Yep, a gun that you even forget is in your front pocket is a gun you will "always" have when you need it! It might buy me the time to fight towards the shotgun, AR or one of my larger caliber handguns . . . not that I think the little Smith won't do the job well!!!
     
  13. mes227

    mes227 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2011
    Messages:
    203
    Location:
    Incline Village, NV
    You can't really compare Taurus with S&W. I own several S&Ws and each is a fantastic gun. Taurus offers low cost and unreliable quality (though they are getting better) but not really anything else.
     
  14. clay_07

    clay_07 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    7
    Has anyone ever shopped at Bud's Gun Shop online?
     
  15. OldCavSoldier

    OldCavSoldier Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Messages:
    535
    Location:
    Colorado
    642 hands down.
     
  16. JMSUN

    JMSUN Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2011
    Messages:
    50
    Not like any more input is needed, but +1 on the Smith.
     
  17. clay_07

    clay_07 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    7
    Does anyone shop for guns online?
     
  18. bannockburn

    bannockburn Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    13,776
    clay 07

    I can't help you about shopping online, but last weekend I picked up a NIB S&W Model 638. What was so unique about this particular model was it had the 2.5" barrel with the full length ejector rod. The gun balanced perfectly in my hand and had a much better feel to it than any of the Taurus snubbies I was looking at. For the money, go with the S&W.
     
  19. ColtPythonElite

    ColtPythonElite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    7,657
    Smith, Ruger, Colt all make/made good snubs....Buy a known quality gun and skip the Taurus.
     
  20. Hondo 60
    • Contributing Member

    Hondo 60 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    5,325
    Location:
    Manitowoc, WI
    Bud's is a good place to look online.
    Of course the down side is that you can't handle it before you buy.
    And you can't have it shipped directly to you, it has to be shipped to an FFL holder near you.

    another good place online is gunsatcost.com.

    They're actually located in Green Bay, WI (which is only 45 miles from me so I save the FFL transfer fee)
    But their prices are usually better than gunbroker.com, or Cabela's.
     
  21. Highcaliber

    Highcaliber Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    197
    Of the choices you listed, I'd say stick with the S&W 642. As an alernate, the Ruger SP101 that another member mentioned would also be a better choice than the Taurus.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page