Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Revolver vs. Semi Auto in Longevity... Who wins?

Discussion in 'Handguns: General Discussion' started by Glockedout17, Mar 3, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Glockedout17

    Glockedout17 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    171
    Location:
    South Florida
    I have a few guns and they all have high round counts, some semi auto's and some revolvers. I'm in the market for a new gun and I think I might go with a .357 mag revolver, but I was just wondering which platform is more durable and will out last the other. Any input will be appreciated.
     
  2. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    Hard to say for sure.
    Jury's still out.

    There are still a lot of working revolvers around that were made in the 1800's, before auto pistols had been invented yet.

    You take good care of either one and it will last longer then you will.

    rc
     
  3. Nomad

    Nomad Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2010
    Messages:
    268
    It's really hard to compare since there are so many variables. For example are you comparing a high pressure caliber like a 44 Mag to a low pressure caliber like a 45 ACP. There are certainly a lot more moving parts in a semi-auto. I think if each is well cared for they will last many decades for the average shooter.

    My guess, with all being equal, the revolver will out last the semi.
     
  4. Pyro

    Pyro Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,073
    Location:
    Earth
    Semi-auto.
    Easier to repair and maintain granted you know what you are doing.
    Revolvers are easier to make parts for though.

    That's me though..
     
  5. jad0110

    jad0110 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,048
    Location:
    Somewhere between the Eastern Block states and Flo
    Didn't we just have one of these thread's 2 weeks ago?

    RC is right. Proper care and maintenance, along with a quality piece, and either should last a lifetime or more. If it doesn't, buy another. No biggie. Most stuff doesn't last a lifetime, particular stuff with moving parts.
     
  6. Ford Prefect

    Ford Prefect Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2007
    Messages:
    70
    Location:
    Blue ball, unfashionable end of the Galaxy
    Guns with long life, no problem. Shooters who can throw over 100,000 rounds? Rare.

    Good luck wearing out a Glock 17 or Ruger GP100. I won't wait for the results.
     
  7. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    34,369
    Location:
    Central PA
  8. Glockedout17

    Glockedout17 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    171
    Location:
    South Florida
    It is hard to say. One thing that's lodged in my head though is over the years I have seen more semi auto's go in for repairs than revolvers. I also see revolvers dating back to 1946 that can still be carried and they are fully functional, I can't say the same for semi autos except for Makarovs and other surplus semi's. Oh I wasn't aware that another thread like this one was out there.... Didn't do a searc, just posted.
     
  9. harmon rabb

    harmon rabb Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,699
    Totally wrong. A revolver has more moving parts.
     
  10. black_powder_Rob

    black_powder_Rob Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    699
    Location:
    Richmond, Texas
    Not all revolvers have more moving parts than a semi-auto, think SAA types.

    As it were I think that the revolver sees less stress applied to its moving parts compared to a semi-auto. When the round goes off the semi-auto's moving parts have the force off the recoil acting on them while the revolver's moving parts only move when the shooter applies force.
     
  11. grendelbane

    grendelbane Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    838
    Location:
    KY
    A whole lot is going to depend upon the design, as well as the cartridge itself.

    For example, the old Colt double action revolvers would go out of time before the S&W revolvers would. For longevity, I would choose S&W over Colt. I would prefer Ruger over either, however. The Security-Six I bought 35 years ago is still going strong, for example.

    If longevity is the goal, I would rather have a semi-automatic, though. Especially if I can keep just a few parts.

    The auto is easier to work on, though the recoil spring does need changing occasionallly, and magazines don't last forever.

    I would say that the general answer has already been discovered by most military and law enforcement. The semi-automatic pistol is much easier to keep in service long term.

    Revolvers can still outlast a lot of the people that shoot them, however.
     
  12. JohnBiltz

    JohnBiltz Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Messages:
    1,621
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Revolvers handle neglect better, automatics handle abuse better. Its pretty easy to damage a double action revolver using it military hard. I've heard accounts of SA revolvers from the 1800s with some piece of scrap metal in them that some one filed into a replacement part. We don't do that anymore, we just order a part. Doesn't mean we can't though. From what I've heard they do do that in places like Afghanistan with automatic and semiautomatic guns.
     
  13. Glockedout17

    Glockedout17 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    171
    Location:
    South Florida
    I think my Ruger SP101 would out last my Glock 22 if I was making enough $ to find out.
     
  14. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,860
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    It depends more on the specific gun than that the type. Parts wear in both, and lower quality metals wear faster.

    Also, what kind of durability are you talking about? Do you mean without repairs whatsoever, or do you mean actually wearing out the main components like frame and slide/cylinder to the point where the gun is a paper weight? Because short of a catastrophic failure, most guns remain serviceable a lot longer than we do. Recoil springs, sears, ratchet hands-these parts do wear out.
     
  15. Float Pilot

    Float Pilot Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,154
    Location:
    Kachemak Bay Alaska
    I have a couple revolvers that were made during the War of Northern Aggression (1860s) and they still work fine.
    The oldest auto loader I have was made in 1899 (broomhandle) and it has already had a few parts replaced to keep it working.
     
  16. gearhead

    gearhead Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    646
    I think revolvers last longer with no maintenance, in other words without changing any springs or in the case of semi-autos, magazines. I think the sort of maintenance that a semi requires is easier to perform than the sort of maintenance a revolver will eventually require, however.
     
  17. conhntr

    conhntr Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    585
    I dont think the question is practicaly relevant in light of todays ammo prices. Even if a design where to wear out at 50,000 rounds (unlikely for a quality piece) thats still 10,000-30,000$ of ammo. If you have to buy a second 500$ revolver or pistol to shoot the next 25,000$ of ammo i doubt it would matter

    From a mechanic curosity standpoint it is interesting though.
     
  18. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    I'm on a JURY lunch break, that my friend RC Model spoke of~~!!! ;) :D
     
  19. barnbwt

    barnbwt Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Messages:
    7,121
    Moot Question

    I'm pretty sure laser-rays will be commonplace by the time I wear out my pistol :D
     
  20. RickMD

    RickMD Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2011
    Messages:
    286
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I think it all depends upon the original quality of the gun. A high quality revolver will outlast a cheap autoloader and a high quality autoloader will outlast a cheap revolver. One thing I've learned in forty years of collecting, shooting, and buying and selling guns is, possibly more than with any other product, you get what you pay for.
     
  21. jmr40

    jmr40 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    10,452
    Location:
    Georgia
    If you don't shoot them much any of them will last hundreds of years. If you're talking high round counts and abuse through guns of equal quality the semi-autos have been out performing revolvers for quite some time now.
     
  22. telkontar

    telkontar Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2006
    Messages:
    117
    Location:
    SW Idaho
    All of the above -- well-made guns will last. But which will jam more during that lifetime? For a Cal Ripken-style "never-miss-a-day/never-misfire" gun, I would take the revolver. So shoot what you like.
     
  23. Lee D

    Lee D Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    278
    Location:
    sw iowa
    i have a 2nd gen G17 thats seen 10s and 10s of thousands of rounds and still running strong, and i imagine my SBHawk is just as durable, but of course it hasnt had near as much shooting.

    imo it all comes down to what you buy. durable guns are just that...durable
     
  24. Hunt480

    Hunt480 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Messages:
    445
    Location:
    Georgia
    I was just out this weekend shooting a 1915 model 38 S&W I inherited from my ole man when he passed...Its still tight and shoots great and the accuracy was very good. Somebody mentioned the great revolvers from the 1800's...I know there are some great semi auto's like the great 1911... but a good revolver will wear out 3 or 4 bodies...the longevity easily goes to the revolvers IMO it aint even close...I aint got nothing against Glocks I own a couple myself but I don't they will shoot a hundred years from now...or at least we will have to wait and see anyway.
     
  25. CajunBass

    CajunBass Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    5,690
    Location:
    North Chesterfield, Virginia
    I say it all the time, but it's the truth.

    I'd like to have the time and the money, to try to shoot either one of them, enough to wear either one of them out.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page