Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

rossi m92 jamming

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by snakeman, Jun 19, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. snakeman

    snakeman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,079
    Location:
    texas
    I just bought a rossi 92 357 and the thing just won't feed 357 ammo well. It seems the cartridge is ramping up at such a steep angle that the bullet is binding nose first on the top of the inside of the chamber. Also, the rim of the case is binding on the cartridge guides :fire:. Can you help?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. greyling22

    greyling22 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    4,422
    Location:
    East Texas
    I had a similar issue I was able to fix. Mine would do 357, but not 38. The best way is to buy the DVD from stevesgunz (google it) but it kind of pricey, I tried to borrow it from a couple members, but they weren't in a sharing mood. The information is out there without the DVD, but I lost the links to it. I think the solution had to do with shimming the cartridge guides with some guess and check work.

    hopefully someone will come along and give you better help.
     
  3. snakeman

    snakeman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,079
    Location:
    texas
    thanks greyling
     
  4. ffg

    ffg Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2003
    Messages:
    28
    Location:
    Gardnerville,Nv
    Now this is strictly my own personal opinion but I feel that the early 92's were based on a 32-20 Winchester. I was able to get the first one to feed by reducing the OAL on the 357s. The second one I had i was able to find a newer style feed rails and that really helped. I don't think that company is in business any more so that's not much help. Hopefully you reload and can tailor a load to fit. I was using a truncated cone style lead bullet.

    Brian
     
  5. snakeman

    snakeman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,079
    Location:
    texas
    Part of the point of getting a 357 was that it's cheap to shoot and I don't want to have to reload for it. I appreciate your input but I would like it to feed factory ammo and if it won't as is I'll just have to modify some things. It feed 38's pretty well so I'm not sure what's going on.
     
  6. greyling22

    greyling22 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    4,422
    Location:
    East Texas
    This is how I sorted out my issue. http://marauder.homestead.com/files/Rossi_92_cartridge_guide.htm

    if you google your problem, you will run intoa lot of references for nate kiowa jones. he is the stevezguns guy. the rossi guru. I also pulled this text out of a forum for you. might be helpful. I also found reference to a too light ejector spring causing issues with 357's.

    "I had one of those rifles a few years back and it was a tad fussy about the ammo it would feed. OAL was the biggest factor followed by nose shape.

    Those HP's you are trying to feed might be a bit blunt and seem to be catching on the chamber lip as it tries to feed. A gentle rounding/breaking of the lower chamber edge might be all that is needed to let it slip by without gouging. I didn't do this to my 45, but the 38/357 version needed the deburring to feed everything well. It would jam similar to yours with the longer 357's before the chamber work.

    If you don't feel like playing with the edge of the chamber, I'd suggest trying different ammo and bullet types to see if you can find something that feeds well all the time.

    Also, make sure you are fully racking the lever forward to get the lifter to raise the round as far as it will go. Some guns need to be worked at a certain pace to feed properly too. Too slow or too fast and they will choke. Try different tempo's with the lever and see if it helps."




    and this is how I slicked mine up. I did about half of what this guy did. http://www.gunreports.com/special_r...-model-92-lever-action-gunsmithing2403-1.html
     
  7. snakeman

    snakeman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,079
    Location:
    texas
    Well I figured out what the problem is. The cartridge guides aren't holding up the rim of the cartridge. AKA I obviously need to shim the right side cartridge guide and see if that helps. I wasn't able to see this before due to bad lighting, but fortunately I found it this morning before I left for work.
     
  8. BCRider

    BCRider Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    7,782
    Location:
    Pacific North"Wet" Coast of Canada
    You'll find that the bullets need to have a nice rounded ogive shape. "Fat" and heavy round nose or SWC bullets don't feed work a hoot.
     
  9. flightsimmer

    flightsimmer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    307
    Location:
    S.E. Indy
    Hornady makes a 140-gn .357 FTX ammo made just for lever action rifles for hunting, it has a plastic tip. And then there's a 38 special FTX.
    There made for tubuler magazines.
    They work super great in mine.
    Usually SWC do not work all that well in the '92 but some do.
    What they do is wedge in the chamber as they feed into it.
     
  10. snakeman

    snakeman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,079
    Location:
    texas
    I'm having the best luck with blazer brass and fiocchi xtp ammo. No SWC's here. Apparently as the cartridge slides up into the chamber, the bolt keeps pushing straight onto the now crooked and unsupported cartridge rim. This creates a bind as the chamber is holding the bullet at one end while the bolt is essentially trying to bend the cartridge at the rim end. I figure, if I adjust the guide rail to support the underside of the rim of the cartridge the problem will be solved. I'll tend to this and see if it helps.
     
  11. snakeman

    snakeman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,079
    Location:
    texas
    Ok I cut some paper and shimmed the cartridge guide. While I was at it I polished the guide slots and the under side of the guide where the feed ramp pushes the cartridge through. All this did improve function quite a bit, but it's still far from chambering smoothly. So, are there any other suggestions for that?
     
  12. eastbank

    eastbank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,056
    several years ago i bought a rossi 92 in 44 mag and it was a total mess with all kinds of feeding problems,after spending countless hours trying to fix the feeding problems i just gave up and sold it. i think alot of the problems were caused because of the strait walled 44mag case and the 357mag suffers from the same problem. if the timing and cartridge guilds are not just right the feeding problems start. the 92 actions were desinged to work with a tapered case,the tapered cases seem to funnel right into the chambers. i bought a rossi 92 in 44-40 and have never had a problem of any kind. eastbank.
     

    Attached Files:

  13. snakeman

    snakeman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,079
    Location:
    texas
    Looking at how your 44-40 is feeding in your pictures, I get the feeling that my gun is definitely trying to feed the ammo at way too steep of an angle. If you compare the pictures you can see that the problem with mine is that the case head is not coming up to mate up with the case mouth or bullet. Do I need to replace a part or two or do some fitting.
     
  14. Tommygunn

    Tommygunn Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    4,652
    Location:
    Morgan County, Alabama
    I have a Browning B-92 in .44magnum. I never had any problem with it feeding ammo .... so I don't think it has anything to do with straightwall cases.
    .44-40 is either a slight truncated case or slight bottleneck, depending upon who is making the brass. The overall dimensions are very similar to .44 magnum if you just examine two rounds side by side, but of course dimensionally they're different. But not so different as to cause feeding problems. A lot of Winchester model 1892s originally made in .44-40 were rechambered in .44 magnum when that round came out in the 1950s and any feeding problems would have shown up then.
    Snakeman's rifle must be "off" in some way to cause the problems he's having. I can't really diagnose his particular difficulty via the interwebz, but I'm fairly sure it has nothing to do with straightwalled cases.
     
  15. stevekozak

    stevekozak Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    173
    I can't be of much help. Mine has fed everything I have put in it, .357s of all shapes and sizes, and .38 all shapes and sizes ( well, no full wadcutters, I really do doubt that they would feed) Watching this thread with interest, though, in case I develop problems down the road. Good luck, and I hope you get it fixed, because these are fun little guns!!
     
  16. eastbank

    eastbank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,056
    the japanese 92 browning is a whole nether ball game,the qualty is top shelf,with the bugs taken care of.the rossi,s are just not that well made(take one apart and look at the inards,not well finished) and the price reflectes it,a used 92 browning in very good condition will bring twice what a new 92 rossie sales for. some thing is not right with the posters 92 rossie, i would take it back to where i bought it to see if they will take care of it. my own problems with the 44mag i bought was just not worth the effort to make it work. if you pay good money for a new rifle it should not take much to have it work like it should. my rossi 92 in 44-40 was bought new,but was new old stock with out the safety on the bolt and from day one it has fed any 44-40 i tried to run thru it with out a bobble.i,m not sure how many times rossi has been sold in the past,but i think tauras has them now. eastbank.
     
  17. Carl N. Brown

    Carl N. Brown Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    8,107
    Location:
    Kingsport Tennessee
    I have a Rossi Puma in .357 as sold by Legacy Sports eight years back. It feeds factory .357 158gr softnose perfectly. It feeds .38 Spl 125gr JHP perfectly. Wadcutters are a problem, but otherwise I wonder if the problem with Rossi 1892s is more particular ammo-related than the fault of the gun, or did I just luck up on my gun or my choice of feed for it?
     
  18. snakeman

    snakeman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,079
    Location:
    texas
    well I've tried 4 different bullet shapes and two different calibers. It feeds 38 special just fine and some 357 somewhat ok. But the ammo I'm using has the bullet shape most are recommending or at least has been similar.
     
  19. ghitch75

    ghitch75 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    744
    Location:
    Greene County,Indiana
    i just sold my 92 in 357 yesterday.....it would shoot and feed anything.....only reason i sold it as i have a 92 in 45Colt and just didn't shoot it any more.....my 45 will eat anything too....these are from 200gr to 325gr.....i would send it in to Rossi.....

    2vxp2r9.jpg
     
  20. Live2offroad

    Live2offroad Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Messages:
    33
    Rossi offers a pretty darn good warranty.. I'd send it back and let them sort it out.

    -Peter
     
  21. snakeman

    snakeman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,079
    Location:
    texas
    I might send it in, but I've already polished the cartridge guides. I wonder if they would take it back. I would like to get the same gun back as it has an excellent trigger and beautiful stock. Believe it or not, when there isn't a cartridge in there the action is pretty darn slick.
     
  22. ghitch75

    ghitch75 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    744
    Location:
    Greene County,Indiana
    they'll fix yours and send it back....
     
  23. BCRider

    BCRider Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    7,782
    Location:
    Pacific North"Wet" Coast of Canada
    Have you seen the pages that can be found on tuning up a Rossi '92?

    http://marauder.homestead.com/files/Rossitune.htm

    The last thing I did to my own recently was to very slightly flare the lower edge of the chamber so rounds would not ride up on the edges of the fairly narrow center only flare as it came. This was the last thing that aided my own Rossi in more easily chambering rounds with less jamming.

    Note that because of how the hinged elevator angles up with a sharp snap at the end of the lever travel you want to avoid really flicking your wrist during the lever cycle. I found that I can cycle it fast but I need to do it without any "flick" to my wrist or the fingers in the loop. If I simply use my arm to cycle it then that slows and smoothens the action of the cycle and avoids the last instant snapping up of the elevator toggle action from having too much speed. If I don't do this and instead let my lever loop fingers flick during the travel I can still get the occasional "stovepipe" with the new round sticking up at the sky.

    Now all that is at "cowboy action" speeds. If I slow down the lever cycling just a little my slicked up Rossi 92 loads both .357Mag and .38Spl rounds slick as a fish sliding around on a wet board. They chamber without the slightest glitch and the most noticable thing to be felt is the slightest "click" at the last moment as the extractor snaps over the rim.

    But it took me a few trips into the action to work on all the steps outlined. I went into the Rossi's guts with the idea that it's easier to take off a little more later on than to go too far right off the bat.

    A spring kit for the Rossis that includes a new ejector spring and a new spring for the elevator toggle is a wise way to start out. The ejector spring is one of the biggest sources of notchiness and roughness in the 92's action. Along with installing the softer ejector spring I found that going over the ejector and tracks in the bolt that the ejector runs through with a small fine stone and deburring all the edges made a very noticable difference. You don't want to round them over. Simply stone the sharpness and any burrs off so you can't feel any catching when you pick at the edges with a fingernail. They should all still look nicely "square" to the eye despite the slight chamfering/rounding from the stoning.

    The very slight additional flaring I did to the mouth of the chamber has to be done with care. You want to give the cartridge a little more room to "funnel" into the chamber. But you don't want to create a lack of support for the casing. All this means that you're working with about the first .030 to .040 of the chamber's mouth. The only tool I could get into this spot with was one of the small half round jeweler's files. Even then I needed to glue the handle into the end of a piece of fiberglass tube to extend the handle. Pressure for the cutting was provided by a finger from my other hand passed down from above and pushing lightly on the flat backside of the file. After the small amount of shaping was done to turn the rather V like existing flare into more of a U shape I taped some very fine 600 wetordry sandpaper around the end of a piece of wooden dowel and worked it in the same manner as the file to polish the added flaring. So little metal was removed in doing this that the whole job took almost no more time to do than to read this description. Even though this added flaring probably only lowered the lower portion of the mouth by about .007 to .010 and extended into the chamber about .040 or so it made a big difference to how it swallows the bullets. Right away I noticed I was no longer getting any "wedgies" where the bullet jams in the mouth. The only failures to chamber I've had since this last step have been the "stovepipes" of the fresh rounds on the elevator from flicking the lever during the loading cycle.
     
  24. snakeman

    snakeman Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    2,079
    Location:
    texas
    Thanks, that's very helpful.
     
  25. wriggly

    wriggly Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2010
    Messages:
    299
    snakeman.....pick up some S&B FMJ .357 rounds. They are the slickest feeding through the Rossi's of any of the ammo available. The metal jackets will polish up the chamber mouth pretty quickly.

    I have found that "Independance Brand" 158 gr JSP work excellent as well. The have a good bullet shape, and a nice rounded crimp. So does the Federal 158 gr JSP.

    You will get instant gratification with the S&B rounds though.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page