Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ruger .44 Alaskan

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by joneb, Aug 18, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. joneb

    joneb Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2005
    Messages:
    3,662
    Location:
    Oregon
    This may be my next revolver any thoughts ? I do already reload for the .44 spl. (a S&W 696) going to .44 mag. would be easy. This gun would be used for fun and back country protection and home defense .
     
  2. Tom C.

    Tom C. Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    734
    Location:
    Southern Maryland
    I consider the 2" barrel kind of short. Mine are 5 1/2", which some may consider too long. Maybe the new 4" is just right.
     
  3. joneb

    joneb Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2005
    Messages:
    3,662
    Location:
    Oregon
    The Ruger Alaskan .44 is the same as the .454 Alaskan with smaller holes. I would think this revolver would be quite strong, and being a reloader I would have alot of versatility for loading, despite the short barrel. I think it would be possible to drive 300 grn slugs in excess of 1200 fps.
     
  4. milcaztra

    milcaztra Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    50
    Location:
    Texas
    I also think the 2 1/2" barrel is a bit short and maybe a little too specialized. A 4 - 4 1/2" barrel would be ideal for what I envision as a general purpose revolver for back country plinking and defense.
     
  5. joneb

    joneb Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2005
    Messages:
    3,662
    Location:
    Oregon
    I wonder if the ejector rod is long enough to extract the shell cases cleanly ? Perhaps another inch on the barrel would make the Alaskan more appealing.
    http://www.gunsamerica.com/guns/976739315.htm
    I'd also like to know the max. COL restrictions for the cylinder.
     
  6. Run&Shoot

    Run&Shoot Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    664
    Location:
    Oregon
    Does a magnum really make sense in a snubnose?

    I would question just how much more velocity you are getting out of a 2" barrel when shooting magnums versus specials. You will get a LOT more muzzle blast, but no where near the velocity from even a 4" barrel.

    I use to have a .357 2" SP101, but it only got a couple of hundred fps increase over the +P specials. Nowhere close to the 1250 fps from a 4". Lighter bullets may get a bit more speed benefit, but if you are shooting magnums you usually want at least the medium weight bullets.

    In regards to the Ruger Alaskan specifically, is there any reason to go with a 2" barrel? The Super Redhawk is a beefy frame and I would think a 4" barrel would conceal as well as a 2". Unfortunately, Ruger seems to be allergic to 4" barrels. If you are looking at a .44 I would either try to find a used SRH or RH custom cut down to 4", or consider a S&W or Taurus .44 that comes easily in 4". The medium frame Taurus Tracker in .44 looks like a handy size though I have not handled one in person yet.
     
  7. MrBigStuff

    MrBigStuff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2005
    Messages:
    90
    Location:
    Tampa, Florida
    With such a small barrel

    the best way to go is with the heaviest bullet possible. I would move up in class and get a .480. With 400 grainers moving between 1050-1100 fps, it's the best way to get the most punch out of a snubbie.
     
  8. DWARREN123

    DWARREN123 Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,749
    Location:
    Between TN & KY
    I have looked at and held them, big revolvers. I like the idea of the .44 mag.
     
  9. P. Plainsman

    P. Plainsman Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,125
    Location:
    Red America
    Jeff Quinn has reviewed and chronographed the .454 and .480 versions of the Alaskan:

    www.gunblast.com/Ruger-SRHAlaskan454.htm

    www.gunblast.com/Ruger-SRHAlaskan480.htm

    With good factory loads in the .454 he got velocities around 1200 fps using bullets in the 300-325 gr range. The max Casull round from Buffalo Bore was an outlier, turning in 360 @ 1219.

    With the .480, a couple of the factory loads pushed 400+ gr bullets to 1000-1050 fps.

    Clearly the Alaskan's short barrel costs one a fair whack of velocity; clearly there's still a lot of power left. The .454 version is more versatile than the .480 since you can use .45 Colt, but to my mind the .480, with heavy bulleted ammo, makes more ballistic sense in a snubby.

    If I owned one I'd call it my ".48 Special." :cool:

    We'll have to wait for chrono info on the .44 Alaskan, unless one of the gun mags has already reviewed it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page